• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anti-Relicing thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you consider relicing "fake mojo?"

I just consider it lame.

Are you bewildered by the idea of intentionally damaging a perfectly good instrument?

I see people with tatoos all the time, "ruining a perfectly good human body," so I guess not.

Do you put it in the same category as face lifts, boob jobs and Auto-Tune?

Tatooing.

If it is not your bass, why do you care?

"Having an opinion" doesn't take that much effort.

Since dissenting opinion is not appreciated in other threads on the subject, this is the place to vent.

For which I thank you. I hope we don't all get "warnings."
 
Do you consider relicing "fake mojo?"
Are you bewildered by the idea of intentionally damaging a perfectly good instrument?

I look at it as a different form of finishing an instrument. People who beat up an instrument seldom do a good job of relic'ing, but a nice relic job can look very good. Just like a hack paint job can look like ****, while someone who knows what they are doing can make a bass look amazing with a coat of paint.
 
Well I think relics are lame, and find it funny that a reliced Fender MIM costes so much. I'm a Fender guy - but taking a look at few "road worns" in my local music store was laughable. They hardly looked like a often played well worn instrument from with years on it. It was more like, look - some idiot took some sand paper and steel wool to a new jazz bass....then rusted up all the exposed metal parts. BOOOOOOOOOOOO relic jobs.
 
Do you consider relicing "fake mojo?"
Are you bewildered by the idea of intentionally damaging a perfectly good instrument?
Do you put it in the same category as face lifts, boob jobs and Auto-Tune?
If it is not your bass, why do you care?

Since dissenting opinion is not appreciated in other threads on the subject, this is the place to vent.

Please refrain from attacking individuals and members' basses--usual TB rules apply.

1. No mojo at all.
Fake, yes.-
Why not spend some more time with the instrument and have it age on the way...and maybe even become a better player in the proces.
2. No. I just recon it might just be a way for companies to get rid of their "less than perfect instruments(?) :D.
3. Kind of.
4. I don't.
 
I have a 71' Fender Jazz that I purchased in 71'......every ding,scratch,checkering,cigerette burn,tarnish etc.etc.etc. was done by me and 38 yrs.of touring,giging, harsh sunlight,bitter cold............yeh, it's roadworn naturally It's seen the best of times and the worst and has never failed me.It now rests comfortably in it's case in the closet. I have a bunch of sparkly new basses that will eventually end up the same way"Naturally".
 
So, I'm in one of my "guitar" classes at college. There's this guy who's a real poser, official grade A prime example. And he turns to the guy next to him, who's got a really beat up strat, and says: "Dude, that's awesome! How'd you get your guitar to look like that?" to which the guy with the strat replied, "Uh...I dunno man, I played it."

Making your instrument look old or like you actually play it as much as you should is possibly the single lamest thing you could ever do. And, I have NEVER been fooled by one of those lame "relic" jobs. They look terrible. An instrument that has been played for forty years is just going to have that look, and there's no other way to get it...unless you have no taste and can't tell the difference, that is. I will play Daisy Rock before I play a Fender Road Worn bass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.