Like this, lol. I do different things and custom requests. Different strokes for different folks. It’s all good. Myself I prefer the simple look as well but sometimes I get board.Never been a fan of wild graphics & over the top labeling.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Like this, lol. I do different things and custom requests. Different strokes for different folks. It’s all good. Myself I prefer the simple look as well but sometimes I get board.Never been a fan of wild graphics & over the top labeling.
I mostly build for myself. If anyone asks, I also build some pedals for sale.I have to ask, @johnk_10 & @disssa, do ya'll sell these cool pedals? Or are these made to order for clients? And @disssa, your designs are equally as attractive to my tastes. I won't go thru all 133 pages but I've been thru enough to see you both producing lots of great looking boxes.
Yeah, just because it's not my thing doesn't mean it ain't a good thing. I'm all for letting your creative ideas fly. My tastes have always gravitated toward the minimalist side.Like this, lol. I do different things and custom requests. Different strokes for different folks. It’s all good. Myself I prefer the simple look as well but sometimes I get board.
View attachment 7231251
View attachment 7231244
I bought 2 pedals from @disssa so far and I can certify his builds and circuit selections are so good ! Both are permanent on my board !Son of a...................@disssa has a link too. I'm leaving now and won't come back until I've redeemed myself.
View attachment 7231134
That sounds good, but I don't notice much of a difference between the dry and the two wet signals.
For computer based frequency response testing I use a MOTU 828x interface and either TrueRTA (paid version), Room EQ Wizard (freeware) depending on what I'm testing. I used to use Rightmark (RMAA) for distortion and signal/noise testing, not sure if it works with Win 11 though. On my bench I just go old school with a cheap GW signal generator, ancient Hitachi 30MHz analog oscilloscope, and a Fluke 179 meter. Since I model most things first just testing at a few well chosen frequencies is often plenty good enough, but I do like the ease of archiving results with TrueRTA.What type of software/hardware do you guys use for testing frequency response and stuff like that?
I guess it depends on your listening device? Definitely not a phone speaker, I hope. Through my Sony mdr7506 I definitely can tell a difference.That sounds good, but I don't notice much of a difference between the dry and the two wet signals.
That's an interesting piece, thanks for the heads up. My current interface is a little bit of a compromise compared the the old EMU one I I used to have as far as noise floor, but for most stuff I build for musical instruments it's still fine. I have access to an AP 1 system at a friend's repair shop a few blocks from my house but I've never actually used it. Just knowing that it's there keeps me GAS free, at least.^ thanks for your reply.
i was wondering if it was worthy to upgrade to the Quant Asylum QA403, but my setup which consist of TrueRTA (level 4) with the RME UC sound card, seems enough.
I guess it depends on your listening device? Definitely not a phone speaker, I hope. Through my Sony mdr7506 I definitely can tell a difference.
I made another take at the end, this time XLR and I turned up the volume to get a little grit...Using Sony MDR-V6 and not much of a difference. The Steddi is just an Alembic F2b 1st stage directly into a cathode follower, no tone stack. That's going to be mild.