In the studio, heck even in the DAW box, there's lotsa playing around with different signal paths, gain staging, etc. If it sounds good, it is good.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
All of me thinks one decent EQ is enough. Overlapping EQ is too much for this "somewhere on the spectrum" meat computer to decode. Where multiple preamps work is when they don't overlap. There's always a simple gain/L/H HPF tube Preamp/DI in front of a Quilter BB800 with its non trad filtery EQ thing going on (or whatever house amp). Then sometimes post DI an RMI Sonic Spark that does different more magic sweepy filtery stuff and/or a Boss GE-7B 7 band graph. The extra preamps are 100% about making imperfect rooms and house cabs workable. The less in the chain the better but I'll throw an extra preamp in without hesitation if it helps lessen a problem. A normal person would probably just do it with one parametric EQ.Part of me thinks shouldn't ONE *decent* EQ be enough?
But then I recall the variety of EQ control schemes I've seen over the years.
10+ band, Bass/mid/Hi knobs, Parametric (some with Q control), straight up hi pass / low pass switches
and even within a similar control scheme, the circuitry is likely to vary significantly
So even if, in theory, one EQ could be enough for you
some controls are easier than others to get the sound you want
and some circuits more easily zone in on the sound you want
I don't do it, but I get it.