• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anybody using three pre amps…?

BassyBill

Gold Supporting Member
In Memoriam
Mar 12, 2005
18,174
4,621
West Midlands UK
… By which I mean one in your active bass, one on your board and one in your main amp. Just curious is all. My current main preference is for my passive PJ, running into one of a few different pedal pres I own then either my GR Pure 800 head or Mesa TT800 head, plus a 212 cab.

When I actually receive my long awaited SGT-DI I think that is likely to often be my pre amp of choice, straight into the Pure 800.
 
… By which I mean one in your active bass, one on your board and one in your main amp. Just curious is all. My current main preference is for my passive PJ, running into one of a few different pedal pres I own then either my GR Pure 800 head or Mesa TT800 head, plus a 212 cab.

When I actually receive my long awaited SGT-DI I think that is likely to often be my pre amp of choice, straight into the Pure 800.
Yep, occasionally. I built all three pieces specifically to work well with each other. I also finally caved and put a preamp bypass switch in one bass too though, since I don't own any passive basses but sometimes need one for pedal testing.
 
Last edited:
My short answer is: no

A rule of thumb I follow is to do my main EQ settings using one tonestack only whenever possible. Otherwise you can go crazy trying to figure out which tonestack is doing what to the overall sound.

So whenever I'm using a preamp pedal, everything else plugs into that, and the preamp goes into either a power amp or the effects return of an instrument amp.

If I'm playing an active bass, I'll usually set the primary sound on the amp or preamp and then fine tune with the onboard preamp. But doing the opposite can work equally well depending on the bass and the amp. For example, if the bass has a filter based tonestack then I'll set up the main tone with the onboard preamp and fine tune with the bass amp.

If you're running a wet/dry or dual amp setup the above holds equally true for each signal path. The only difference is there's two signal chains to set up. But I still want only one tonestack calling the shots on each chain.
 
Part of me thinks shouldn't ONE *decent* EQ be enough?

But then I recall the variety of EQ control schemes I've seen over the years.
10+ band, Bass/mid/Hi knobs, Parametric (some with Q control), straight up hi pass / low pass switches
and even within a similar control scheme, the circuitry is likely to vary significantly

So even if, in theory, one EQ could be enough for you
some controls are easier than others to get the sound you want
and some circuits more easily zone in on the sound you want

I don't do it, but I get it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassyBill
I mean, technically.
My EMG pickups have built-in preamps, plus the onboard tonepump, so that's two-three in my bass alone, I have a line driver at the front of my board, a buffered boss octave pedal, and a preamp in my amplifier or DI.
Probably most guitar and bass rigs have a whole lotta preamps.
 

Latest posts