I understand why they are there and their purpose. I just don't like the way they look aesthetically. Probably a sacrilegious viewpoint. But I can't be the only one, can I?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's for balance. That's also why most basses have longer upper horns.Interesting. I have actually been meaning to ask about these--"mitten basses". Is the purpose of the extended cut just aesthetic, or does it make the bass resonate better?
does it make the bass resonate better?
Only because most are so badly implemented they annoy my engineering sense.I understand why they are there and their purpose. I just don't like the way they look aesthetically. Probably a sacrilegious viewpoint. But I can't be the only one, can I?
You don't want your solid-body electric instrument to resonate:
myth-busting: Resonance is not synonymous with Vibration
It makes you look like a jazz player.Interesting. I have actually been meaning to ask about these--"mitten basses". Is the purpose of the extended cut just aesthetic, or does it make the bass resonate better?
On a bass, or cabinet?I understand why they are there and their purpose. I just don't like the way they look aesthetically. Probably a sacrilegious viewpoint. But I can't be the only one, can I?