Some people don't understand that the neck should be perfectly flat - no relief.
Wait ... What?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Some people don't understand that the neck should be perfectly flat - no relief.
Wait ... What?
Sure, but when people are complaining about "warped" necks and the like... Sounds like the bass just needs a decent setup. Some people don't understand that the neck should be perfectly flat - no relief. Also, the truss rod is biflex. When I see people complain about buzzing frets I tend to think they've tightened the truss rods too far.
This guy obviously has an axe to grind. He buys some seconds from the largest impersonal warehouse retailer in the world, and pronounces that Rickenbacker is a bad company. Sheesh. Many of his "issues" are patently ridiculous. He has several threads floating around here, all with the same complaints, same pics, same list of grievances. When an attempt is made to set him straight, he complains of "fanboys", whatever that means.![]()
audiomitch said:The cheap plastic nut is serviceable, but if you want to customize the height, you'll need to replace it (unlike a Ric that leaves the nut high for this very purpose).
I agree that Fender QC is spotty but the below is ridiculous. There's only one way to cut a nut - slotted low enough that the difficulty of pressing down the first fret is as difficult as pressing down the second with a capo on the first, and high enough that open strings don't buzz, with the top of the nut filed down so that about half the string sits above the fret so that the strings don't bind in their slots. Ask any setup guide. Cutting them intentionally high, if Ric does it, is half-finished work and ridiculously lazy, imho.
RIC myth.
Here's a great website by a Ric knowledgeable tech -
joeysbassnotes.com
Truss Rod Adjustment (for neck relief)
Rickenbacker instruments intonate and play best when the neck is as straight as possible. I have gotten quite a few emails from Rickenbacker bass owners who are not comfortable to yet do their own set up, telling me that a certain guitar repairman insists that a Rick bass neck should have relief just like any other bass guitar. If a guitar repairman tells you this, then it should immediately tell you that this guitar repairman has little or no knowledge and experience setting up or repairing Rickenbacker basses. Take your Rick elsewhere.
There are a number of things to look for on a new RIC, where their quality control is lacking:
- Paint issues, especially around the bridge.
- Bridge tail lift: this is extremely common
- Fretwork: my first Ric had horrible fretwork. I couldn't achieve action below 7/64th of an inch and had a number of super high frets.
- Case issues: look for broken handles and broken feet.
But it's certainly not the "myth" as stated earlier. I can get my Ric neck pretty straight, as straight as I can get it. Under those conditions, the phrase "perfectly straight" would apply. Your position is one of semantics, the underlying concept remains valid.
These are issues with your Ric that you bought during the blow out sale from Musicians Friend. It's hardly comprehensive data that can draw a conclusion about all new Rics. Even taking every MID 4003 sold during that sale isn't enough data to make that sweeping conclusion.
Translation, you can't get is "perfectly straight", as the bass becomes unplayable. Of course it's a myth, all basses need a little relief, and the Ric is no different. They build a nice bass, but they haven't defeated the physics of a vibrating string as comments like that would lead us to believe.
)These are issues with your Ric that you bought during the blow out sale from Musicians Friend. It's hardly comprehensive data that can draw a conclusion about all new Rics. Even taking every MID 4003 sold during that sale isn't enough data to make that sweeping conclusion.