• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Are abstract art fans stupid?

We can look at Art and see the parallels of music, notice what everyone is saying.
I was listening to a performance in school and it was a guy doing some wacky digital stuff, but it's composition and arrangement was too sloppy and rushed. But it was very "creative". It seems like as long as your creative the other aspects of music and art don't matter. People will find meaning and emotion even if there is no emotion in music and in art. It's not all about being aesthetically pleasing somethings are only great because they're so abrasive. And the notion that it being hard to make makes it good is absolutely wrong. But creativity or making something that looks/sounds enigmatic should not be the only way we judge it. What is funny about the bear? Because we are sold the idea that if you don't like it, you just can't understand it. "I know something, you don't, and if you don't like it, you're just too old, too conservative or too ignorant." And when we are told that we find ourselves accepting everything regardless of the other aspects of art and simply does it look emotional or inspired.
 
We can look at Art and see the parallels of music, notice what everyone is saying.
I was listening to a performance in school and it was a guy doing some wacky digital stuff, but it's composition and arrangement was too sloppy and rushed. But it was very "creative". It seems like as long as your creative the other aspects of music and art don't matter. People will find meaning and emotion even if there is no emotion in music and in art. It's not all about being aesthetically pleasing somethings are only great because they're so abrasive. And the notion that it being hard to make makes it good is absolutely wrong. But creativity or making something that looks/sounds enigmatic should not be the only way we judge it. What is funny about the bear? Because we are sold the idea that if you don't like it, you just can't understand it. "I know something, you don't, and if you don't like it, you're just too old, too conservative or too ignorant." And when we are told that we find ourselves accepting everything regardless of the other aspects of art and simply does it look emotional or inspired.

And just as in music, I would rather hear someone say "It's not my cup of tea" or "Dosen't do anything for me" rather than say "Can you believe someone made this crap?!?!?!" Many people think Pollock paintings look like someone spilled paint on a drop cloth. Others are moved emotionally by it. Is one of them wrong?
 
Art for me is something thats visually pleasing. Really I've never bothered with meanings or what an artist is trying to say or the deeper side of it really, because I find a lot of it hard to swallow.

It's the same for me with music. I don't take messages or meanings. I just listen and if it's aurally pleasing to me I like it.

I don't like the bears paintings. I don't know why but I think its rubbish [Edit: the donkey seems pretty talented though]
 
Art for me is something thats visually pleasing. Really I've never bothered with meanings or what an artist is trying to say or the deeper side of it really, because I find a lot of it hard to swallow.

It's the same for me with music. I don't take messages or meanings. I just listen and if it's aurally pleasing to me I like it.

I don't like the bears paintings. I don't know why but I think its rubbish.

I respect that, but not everybody is like that.
 
Exactly. One of my favorite surrealist paintings:
148052.jpg


can be interpreted about 20 different ways, and everyone seems to see it differently.



Who painted that? It's amazing. (I don't know much surreal art)
 
http://www.9news.com/news/watercooler/article.aspx?storyid=98146&catid=337


But then again that implies art can only be good if it is made by a human. So maybe not.
What are your thoughts on Abstract art?

art is a form of expression. that presupposes two things:

1. having feelings and ideas to express
2. consciously using something to express those feelings/ideas.

i don't doubt that bears have feelings. they may even have ideas.

i seriously doubt that they can express those with paint or musical instruments. might make interesting pictures or sounds. but it isn't art.

abstract art is okay. i prefer surrealism.