TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
True. Your post was open to all TBers to vote in. I did. Whether or not you agree with my opinion on this topic my vote still counts. There also was/is the option to explain and/or expound on your answer to clarify it. I did that, too. If you don't agree with my opinion or musical taste regarding DJs that is your right to do so. By understanding the opinions of others whether or not you share them only serves to educate you as to where you stand in relation to those polled. If you believe that red is actually yellow and have a vote on it, you may find you're in the minority. Most people believe red and yellow are different colors. You can try arguing your point but most folks wouldn't budge on what seems to them to be such an obvious truth. Due to the wide parameters of what can be perceived as art/music/creativity/expression, some DJs get a bit of a free pass to include themselves in the category of musicians despite not having to do the work needed to actually fit the bill. We talk about hacks and posers here and everybody knows what we mean. DJs are not all the same and surely there is a bell curve in their numbers like in every other pursuit. Brilliant visionaries who revolutionize their art and fake wannabes who stink. Lumping them all together in order to label them isn't fair. The real question should be "CAN DJs be respected and accepted as legitimate musicians?" A fact of life is that whenever you ask people to vote, the people you are asking are all not on the same level and that colors their judgement. At different stages of life you look at things differently. Toddlers don't worry about their retirement. This applies to all facets of life and may account for why tastes change. It's okay, you'll grow out of it.With respect, this was pretty much agreed upon on page one. Since then we've seen various attempts to find definitions of music that could exclude what DJs do without including our friends in our bands. None of them so far have really stood up to closer examination. Well, unless they were between pages 13 and 18.
Also, I have an impression you've never really heard what is on the records turntablists use. Which, in turn makes me think you might not be aware of what is created and what is pre-recorded on the snippets of scratching scattered throughout the thread.
Its not my poll but your points are good ones. I expect if the question was can DJs be accepted as musicians the endless debate would be around by whom.True. Your post was open to all TBers to vote in. I did. Whether or not you agree with my opinion on this topic my vote still counts. There also was/is the option to explain and/or expound on your answer to clarify it. I did that, too. If you don't agree with my opinion or musical taste regarding DJs that is your right to do so. By understanding the opinions of others whether or not you share them only serves to educate you as to where you stand in relation to those polled. If you believe that red is actually yellow and have a vote on it, you may find you're in the minority. Most people believe red and yellow are different colors. You can try arguing your point but most folks wouldn't budge on what seems to them to be such an obvious truth. Due to the wide parameters of what can be perceived as art/music/creativity/expression, some DJs get a bit of a free pass to include themselves in the category of musicians despite not having to do the work needed to actually fit the bill. We talk about hacks and posers here and everybody knows what we mean. DJs are not all the same and surely there is a bell curve in their numbers like in every other pursuit. Brilliant visionaries who revolutionize their art and fake wannabes who stink. Lumping them all together in order to label them isn't fair. The real question should be "CAN DJs be respected and accepted as legitimate musicians?" A fact of life is that whenever you ask people to vote, the people you are asking are all not on the same level and that colors their judgement. At different stages of life you look at things differently. Toddlers don't worry about their retirement. This applies to all facets of life and may account for why tastes change. It's okay, you'll grow out of it.
I can show how dark is heavier than light.........................Coming Soon!!! The Next TB Poll For Thrill Seeking Adventure and senseless debate: "Is blue light or dark? Your thoughts." Coming soon to a TB cage match arena near you...
Wonder why Tony isn't playing in this one?How about
'Levin only needs three'; Discuss.
Wonder why Tony isn't playing in this one?
sorry, for my English?You mean why Levin isn't playing on this tune?
No worries!sorry, for my English?
Jah Wobble and Wendy MelvoinNo worries!
That's what you mean?
...and if not Levin; Who is it? John Gilblin maybe?
Wobble and Melvoin played bass with Peter Gabriel?Jah Wobble and Wendy Melvoin
Burn You Up, Burn You Down - PeterGabriel.comWobble and Melvoin played bass with Peter Gabriel?
..and why did levin not play on that tune , if he indeed didn't?
Interesting. Levin is not mentioned, but since he was never exclusively Peter Gabriel's bassist( afak), there is no reason why he should be either.
Is a piano a string instrument, or a percussion instrument?Coming Soon!!! The Next TB Poll For Thrill Seeking Adventure and senseless debate: "Is blue light or dark? Your thoughts." Coming soon to a TB cage match arena near you...
He's a busy guy. Could just be he wasn't available that week.Interesting. Levin is not mentioned, but since he was never exclusively Peter Gabriel's bassist( afak), there is no reason why he should be either.
Thanks for this info!
both.Is a piano a string instrument, or a percussion instrument?