If I was a rich man I would have expensive basses as I would also travel first class and stay in top hotels and have nice cars, alas I am one of life`s strugglers so have to try and get the best product and value for my money 

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The truth is that you reach a point of diminishing returns as you start paying more for a bass -- you pay more and more for less and less.
Most manufacturers cynically make very little improvement cost the buyer a great deal in their ascending product lines.
Often, the entry-level products exhibit the best dollar value. Are they the best basses? No, but they typically represent the most for the money.
As I've pointed out many times before, the gear business is about marketing, not gear as such.
I can't see where a $5000-$7000 dollar instrument is really any better than a $2500-$3500 Sadowsky, Lull, Lakeland, etc.
I *finally* got a decent bass (Lakland 55-94, same as below) and I gotta say, it makes a HUGE difference, but only to me.No one, and I mean no one, even band mates, notice a difference.
Maybe if you're recording, buy a nice bass, but for live: buy an SX and trash it at the end of every show. THAT people will notice. The tone, no, not once, ever.
![]()