TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting. I'm in the minority of 65+ who still use a desk top.I believe this webpages suggests it's you...[This invalid link has been removed]
I can empathize.
Can you leave even a teenie bit of her for me, please?Hang out with Jeannie more.
I can honestly say as I started playing double bass my visits have lessened and shortened.
And yes, the argumentative posts are just so unnecessary and useless. Especially when someone new to bass is just looking for and answer or help. Regardless of whether or not it has been discussed a million times...

Here's another analytics website:
talkbass.com Traffic Analytics, Ranking Stats & Tech Stack | Similarweb
This is surprising as people seem to think most TB member are old as dirt:
View attachment 5234971
I think I've made it through a majority the information threads that pertain to me and I do check multiple times a day but I'm not as active in as many threads as i used to be.Without seeing log files or visitor stats, I can't really tell. So I don't know if things are really slowing down or I'm losing interest myself and that is being misinterpreted by myself as "things slowing down".
Noone forces you to read, agree or comply.
So you posted a political opinion on a site that bans politics.Noone forces you to read, agree or comply.
Its a great system.
Why would free speech be considered political? Thats an odd thing to say, but I applaud your right to do so.So you posted a political opinion on a site that bans politics.
Liberty until busted, I guess.
Found this explanation online. I believe it applies to TalkBass and other private sites like Twitter, FaceBook, etc.Why would free speech be considered political? Thats an odd thing to say, but I applaud your right to do so.
You were the one who dropped a bomb mid-thread about your rights under the US constitution. If you don't actually have an issue in that regard, thanks for the derail I guess? Now the remainder of this thread is going to be about you.Why would free speech be considered political? Thats an odd thing to say, but I applaud your right to do so.
But is that a breakdown of membership, or posting volume?
Found this explanation online. I believe it applies to TalkBass and other private sites like Twitter, FaceBook, etc.
Like I said, does not require legal interpretation. As for Tweeter and facebook, I have never been a member.
"Our shared conversations are increasingly taking place in privately owned and managed walled gardens, which means that the politics that occur in such conversations are subject to private rules.”
Therein lies the problem. Yes, the First Amendment applies online, just as it does in regular written, personal, religious, and political discourse. But one of the key limitations of the internet lies less in what we can say, but where we choose to say it. Does this mean the First Amendment comes screeching to a halt when we hop online? Not necessarily. But we engage each other through the internet primarily via private websites, not public ones, so the First Amendment, to no small degree, is far from a protected “free speech zone”.
Have never been a member of FB or Twit.Found this explanation online. I believe it applies to TalkBass and other private sites like Twitter, FaceBook, etc.
"Our shared conversations are increasingly taking place in privately owned and managed walled gardens, which means that the politics that occur in such conversations are subject to private rules.”
Therein lies the problem. Yes, the First Amendment applies online, just as it does in regular written, personal, religious, and political discourse. But one of the key limitations of the internet lies less in what we can say, but where we choose to say it. Does this mean the First Amendment comes screeching to a halt when we hop online? Not necessarily. But we engage each other through the internet primarily via private websites, not public ones, so the First Amendment, to no small degree, is far from a protected “free speech zone”.