• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Armstrong Vintage Reproduction Pickups (Jazz)

chuck norriss

Inactive
Jan 20, 2011
8,710
924
124
I installed an Armstrong bridge pickup in my standard jazz bass with positive results.
It's loud and clear. It definitely sounds better than the MIM standard j pickup, which is fine, but this one is clearly better. It's not crazy-hot or scooped, not too much or too little of anything, just a clear well balanced pickup.
Isolated, it's strong enough and round enough on its own. With the tone turned up it has a nice ring to it, articulate & handles chords. Pure.
Tone knob turned down it sounds cool. Still a shot in the arm. I realize that's not much of a description. It sounds like nothing's lost or taken away with the tone knob rolled back.

I only bought the bridge pup for now. I intend to get the neck pup later. As of now the bridge Armstrong pup with the neck mim pup sound great together. They also offer a loaded jb control plate. You'll have to ask them what it includes
Catherine was sitting in front of the cab while I tested it out and she said she could feel the notes better after I installed the Armstrong & thought it sounded sharper. I don't think it's Marcus miller sharp but it's sharper & louder than a stock.
Build quality is solid, robust.
The manufacturer said he spent four years taking apart pickups. Sounds familiar. Good communication by email & shipped in a few days

Their info: Armstrong, Division of OnlyMusic LLC Rutherford, NJ onlymusicusa.com email [email protected]

$40

Charles

Updated info:
After using this pickup every day for a week then going back to my P-bass Special with a Dimarzio in the bridge position (the Dimarzio model with adjustable pole pieces) I've come to love the Armstrong and hate the Dimarzio. The Armstrong is tight and exact. I get the sound I want and love, from it. The Dimarzio sounds like I'm talking with my nose plugged. It requires constant adjusting on my equalizer which I prefer not to do. I realize now why I had to fiddle with the equalizer so often with my P; it's because the pickup is just dreadfully wrong. I thought I was OCD'd but I'm not. My conclusion--I intend to replace the Dimarzio with another Armstrong.
 
Fretless P jazz neck, Armstrong Vintage Replica in bridge position (only, no pickup in the P spot), Wilkinson 4-banger w/brass saddles:
By comparison, for reference, it reminds me of the vintage reissue pickup that comes with the Geddy model. It's not as juiced as a Duncan 1/4 Pounder which I hear as extreme low end presence & sometimes overly aggressive top end. Not to say the QP is scooped, just on steroids. Dimarzio--maybe it's just me I just don't like the shape of the mids despite their popularity. Standards are like mild salsa--I think that's the general consensus.
Armstrong has more presence & more buttocks than the Standard, a more pleasant that-vintage-tone than the Dimarzio. Just a solid jb bridge tone. Pretty even across the strings & sensitive enough to find a good distance between strings & poles. Gets grimy at close distance to strings (some of you like it dirty). And on my jazz (QP-neck + Armstrong bridge) got two thumbs-up from band mates (among electric g, acoustic g, bass, drums). It stays.

This is a good economical alternative to the prohibitively expensive vintage replica pickups out there.