TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I question the need of the journalist to mention his beliefs, it seems quite off-topic.
Manages to reinforce the negative stereotypes of both heavy metalers and christians in one fell swoop. Quite a piece of work.![]()
No real need, but it guarantees more attention paid to the article. It's a hot button. I generally question the integrity of the media in general.
It's tasteless. Say some guy runs over a kid while DUI. Would the article state his ethnicity, religion, etc.?
With the same kind of article structure it would looks something like this:
"A twelve year old girl was killed on Monday night in a DUI accident.
The 40 year old male, Bob Bobber, is currently held by the authorities and will be charged on two counts of aggravated DUI.
The victim was identified as Bab Babbette.
The incident occured as Bob Bobber was driving back home from an amateur football game. He said to the authorities he had been drinking since early that afternoon.
Bob had attended his local mosque the night before this incident. A person who knew him said he was quite dedicated to his religion and tries hard to live by it"
Seriously, it doesn't even makes sense.
It's tasteless. Say some guy runs over a kid while DUI. Would the article state his ethnicity, religion, etc.?
With the same kind of article structure it would looks something like this:
"A twelve year old girl was killed on Monday night in a DUI accident.
The 40 year old male, Bob Bobber, is currently held by the authorities and will be charged on two counts of aggravated DUI.
The victim was identified as Bab Babbette.
The incident occured as Bob Bobber was driving back home from an amateur football game. He said to the authorities he had been drinking since early that afternoon.
Bob had attended his local mosque the night before this incident. A person who knew him said he was quite dedicated to his religion and tries hard to live by it"
Seriously, it doesn't even makes sense.
I don't disagree with you a single bit. We live in a tasteless, shallow society. Not to distract from the topic of the article, but the handling of it hardly leaves anything but a bitter taste in my mouth.
Does Bab Babbette have a website with portions of his FAQ section dedicated to his r*******?
Does Bab Babbette have a website with portions of his FAQ section dedicated to his r*******?
Don't think so, but I heard that Bob Loblaw's Law Blog is covering the case.
I wouldn't necessarily generalize. I'm an advocate of the importance of media in a representative democracy. I'm also an advocate of the importance of "hard-news" (as opposed to "soft-news") which is basically described as evidence based, methodological journalism.
This article however is clearly soft-news.
I would posit that it was handled this way because every philosophy needs a light shined on it's hypocrites.
...My point is that his religion or how he describes his band as a "christian" band is besides the issue that the journalist (should) cover in his article.
For the record, I'm atheist.
My point is that his religion or how he describes his band as a "christian" band is besides the issue that the journalist (should) cover in his article.
For the record, I'm atheist.