Im in the market for a p-bass. Does it matter whether it’s ash or alder as far as tone? Thanks!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
For me, alder sounds better than ash. More mids and warmer/mellower.
Some people don't think body wood affects tone, though.
Interesting. I have two Precisions; A '62 reissue made of alder, and a CS '59 made of swamp ash. The pickups are very similar. The CS '59 has stronger mids and sounds much darker overall. The '62 is more even sounding across the tonal spectrum. Both are very warm sounding, with the ash bodied '59 perhaps a tad warmer than '62, which is slightly more 'open' sounding.I agree with you on all counts, especially regarding stronger midrange.
Ash...always.Im in the market for a p-bass. Does it matter whether it’s ash or alder as far as tone? Thanks!
You mean more pronounced mids in ash.In general, ash has more scooped mids compared to alder.
That is funny, cause I was rocking my P neck on my tele waiting for my neck from warmoth to come in. It showed up yesterday. It's a lot thicker and heavier than my fender neck. But, so is the tone now. Its huge and meaty. I knew it had to be the neck. I mean, not even just the sound. You can actually feel the difference even unplugged.The neck plays a bigger part of the tone. I have put the same neck on ash, alder, and walnut and found that tone tends to follow the neck. I did the same with a wenge/ebony neck with the same results. I know lots will say it doesn’t matter at all but have they ever truly built bass and tried swapping parts as a test. I have and my ears have heard the truth.....LOL. In your case go with which ever is lightest and looks good if you go with a transparent finish.