• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Audere Audio Preamp review

David Wilson

Supporting Member
Oct 14, 2002
11,670
468
Lower Westchester, NY
Audere Preamp Review

Gear used:
Bass Valenti Geddy Vee five string Jazz bass with Nordstrand big single pickups
Amps Thunderfunk TF 550, Eden WT800B
Cabs Epifani UL-112, Epifani UL-310

Installation

I received a pre-wired 4 band Audere preamp for review. Wired with volume, blend, high mid/treble, low mid/bass. While the control scheme seemed slightly counterintuitive at first, it quickly became second nature.

Installation was straightforward, the pots came prewired with a jack attached. So all I had to do was ground the control plate, attach the bridge ground and pickup wires. Shrink tubing was supplied for the joints, which was handy because I was all out of it :-)

The preamp is slightly longer than a 9v battery, and slightly skinnier.

Operation

On plugging in, the led flashes to let you know your battery condition. Very cool!

The major differentiator of the Audere preamp it it's Z-Mode operation, which puts an adjustable input impedance load on the pickups. It has three modes, which can be very quickly summarised as follows.

Low Z Low end emphasis, can sound louder than other modes due to this. There are trim pots to adjust pickup gain in LZ mode. Least noise with single coil pickups.
Mid Z Most typical of standard active bass
High Z Brighter. There are trim pots to adjust added capacitance. Most noise with single coil pickups.

More in depth details here:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

I found the usefulness of the various modes depended on the amp I was plugged into. Into the Thunderfunk, the High Z mode seemed a bit too bright with the bridge pickup favoured. Into the Eden, the Low Z was a little bit too high end shy. With EQ adjustments on the amp, such as turning the Timbre ccw on the TF and turning the tweeter up when using the Eden, I was able to get good sounds for all modes. I left the High-Z mode 'added capacitance' trimmers on the preamp at minimum.

Prior to the Audere, I had an Aguilar OBP-2 preamp in the Valenti. It sounded nice, but my major gripe was that the bass boost wasn't very subtle. It seemed to be either off or at 40%. I wanted something more granular in it's control range.

I was able to dial in some more subtle bass boosts than I was used to with the Aguilar. To be honest, I didn't end up using the high mid control much at all. Along with the OBP-2, I also had a passive tone control previously. I didn't miss having this, since dropping into Low-Z mode muted the high end nicely for Motown lines. I know Audere offers passive style tone controls for both bass and treble.

Summary

I was very impressed with the Audere preamp, and after returning this unit I'll be ordering my own. I think I'll probably order it in 3 band mode only. For my playing style, mostly finger, I used Mid-Z most often and occasionally Low-Z. For pick style, I used Mid-Z and High-Z depending on the sound I was going after. High-Z worked very nicely for some of those Joy Division style riffs. While the price is more expensive than other preamps such as the Aguilar, when you figure in the extra versatility given by the Z Mode switch and the fact that most of the pots come prewired that difference seems much less.

The Clips

For each of the various licks, I recorded them 3-4 times each. They're always recorded once each with eq flat in each Z-Mode. If I felt like I could eq the sound better, the 4th sample is the lick eq'd in a chosen mode. So, first clip is always High-Z, second is always Medium-Z and third is always Low-Z mode.
 
Slap sample. 4 clips
Recorded with blend centered. 4th clip is recorded in Mid-Z mode, high mid cut, bass boosted.

Finger/center sample. 4 clips
Recorded with blend centered. 4th clip is recorded in Mid-Z mode, treble cut, bass boosted, low mid boosted
 

Attachments

Finder/bridge sample. 4 clips
Recorded with bridge pickup favoured slightly. 4th clip recorded in Low-Z mode, bass boosted, low mid boosted

Pick/center sample. 4 clips
Recorded with blend centered. 4th clip recorded with in Mid Z mode, bass boosted, low mid boosted
 

Attachments

Any comments on the blend? Audere buffers each pickup before the volume and/or blend controls, so I was thinking you should get a much more even taper when you're trying for things like 20% neck/80% bridge. I've found practically all typical blend pots to act like little more than a pickup switch due to the interaction of the pickups impedances.

I'm really interested in this pre for my Dingwall AB1, 'cause I think the Z-Mode would be great for mellowing out the high end of the FD-3 pickups when I want it - the FD-3's are pretty "zingy", which is sometimes good, but when I want a mellower tone I can't really seem to get it through typical tone controls. By the time I knock out the "zing", it gets too muffled and thumpy. And I'd like a blend circuit for the AB1 that works as well as my EMG equipped bass, but 1)EMG's blend circuit only works with EMG pickups, 2)EMG pickups won't fit in the AB1's pickup routs and 3)I've already got my "EMG sound" bass so I don't want to take the Dingwall in that direction.
 
David, thanks for the review and the clips .... I'm having the Audere Z-mode installed on a 7 being built by FBB, based on a suggestion by Matt Schmill. After talking it through with him and after a couple of e-mails back & forth with David Meadows @ Audere, I decided to give the pre a shot.

Your clips are a great example of just what I expected to hear from the pre. I'm having FBB-branded Dingwall pups installed and now I'm feeling a lot more comfortable with the decisions made.

Thanks again ...... :cool:
 
BruceWane said:
I've found practically all typical blend pots to act like little more than a pickup switch due to the interaction of the pickups impedances.

Amen to that... the only bass with a blend I've ever played with a blend that actually 'blended' was an EMG-equipped G&L L-5500, which produced audibly-different tones depending on where the blend knob was set.
 
DEVILMAN said:
Does the Audere 4 band have as much low-end capability as the Aguilar OBP-3 or is it a super "hi-fi" affair that doesn't emphasize that?...

~S~
You can get plenty of low end boost if you want, the major difference in bass boost operation between the Audere and the Aguilar is that the Audere has a far more granular control of the bass boost.
 
David, emjazz or anyone else that's played with the Audere:
Do you think that a setup with just the Z switch, blend and two tone controls (one for each pickup) would give a good amount of variety (for a bass with two dual coils and pickup switching, let say)? I might go for the active pre, but the simpler setup is appealing.

Thanks,
Marshall
 
smperry said:
David, emjazz or anyone else that's played with the Audere:
Do you think that a setup with just the Z switch, blend and two tone controls (one for each pickup) would give a good amount of variety (for a bass with two dual coils and pickup switching, let say)? I might go for the active pre, but the simpler setup is appealing.

Thanks,
Marshall
I see you posted this question in another thread also. To use the audere, you need to put the signal through an active pre, whether you choose to have any active eq with it or not.