TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I really love the sound of low z with the bridge pickup and the tone rolled back. Great sound.emjazz said:I'd love to hear a P bass in low z with the tone rolled back.
KJung said:Nice sound Andy. But... I always put the FBass preamps at the very top of my list.... wonderful transparency, the best, most usable mid control in the business, a great passive tone control.... I'm surprised you felt you needed to swap it out. I absolutely loved that preamp.
The only reason I'm not playing an FBass today is based on the way the bass is positioned when played standing... I never could get used to that big body hanging way to the right. Pure personal preference though.... great basses. However, I think I would have stuck with George's preamp.
emjazz said:I never dreamed of swapping it out but the difference was astounding. The F Bass pre was adding a compression that I didn't even know was there. It became apparent when I put the Audere in. All of a sudden the bass became more dynamic and clearer. The Audere also allows many, many more usable sounds than the F pre does. That's not to say I don't like the F pre, it's great, but it can't begin to do what the Audere does, especially the 4 band pre that I have. I certainly wouldn't be unhappy with the F Bass preamp again, I really like that preamp. It's that the Audere's eq points seem to really fill in some of the holes that the bass has, especially in the low mids. Remember, I have an ebony board and it reacts and sounds differently than the maple board F's. Anyway, just my 2 cents from first hand experience.