• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Audio "STEMS" are NOT "Individual Audio Tracks"

It's a matter of accepting how things are in reality rather than wedding ourselves to things being just as we want them to be.

It doesn't actually matter how people use the term 'stems', language is incredibly arbitrary and meanings change all the time. People use this word to describe something it didn't used to describe.The world will keep turning and recordings will get made.
And fees will go up and work declined because Stem and Track mean different things and can't be used interchangeably. Stupid people using words improperly does change their meaning
 
Haven't read all the pages , sorry if it's been said but you can call stems : Busses
Without risking receiving tomatoes

A stereo stem is basically what you send to a stereo bus ( or Aux )


It's like using the term : Remix
A remix is taking the master 48 tracks and redo the EQ , balance , panning , Surround , FX etc....
It's not adding an existing beat to an existing song ( insert a face palm icon here )
That's "Arrangement" , or "Re-arrangement" , that's not a remix

And some people are totally clueless of what Comps are ( insert another face palm icon here )
 
Last edited:
Haven't read all the pages , sorry if it's been said but you can call stems : Busses
Without risking receiving tomatoes

A stereo stem is basically what you send to a stereo bus ( or Aux )


It's like using the term : Remix
A remix is taking the master 48 tracks and redo the EQ , balance , panning , Surround , FX etc....
It's not adding an existing beat to an existing song ( insert a face palm icon here )
That's "Arrangement" , or "Re-arrangement" , that's not a remix

And some people are totally clueless of what Comps are ( insert another face palm icon here )
A buss and a stem are not synonamous
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC7 and SteveCS
The point here is that an Aux is not a Stem, and a Bus is not a Stem. An Aux/Bus can be employed to generate a Stem, but they are different categories of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveCS
I'll read it for you guys :

"The term ‘bus’ strictly applies to any mix bus, but often it is used to describe an audio sub‑group, which is used to gather and combine a number of related sources to allow overall control via the bus or sub-group fader. Its output is often referred to as a ‘stem’ and typically forms a key part within the final mix. For example, you might ‘bus’ all the drum mics together to allow overall control by one (or two) faders, instead of having to juggle and balance six or more individual drum channel faders.





 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Krisfield
That doesn't mean the real-time output or sound, as in what is heard when you press play, but is an audio product - mixe tape track or digital audio file. Saying a Bus is a Stem is a bit like saying the extruder is the spaghetti!
Agreed. Similarly, calling an aux (more correctly an aux send) the same as a buss is also inaccurate. An aux send is a portion of a channel used to deliver the channel's output in parallel to a buss. Calling an aux send a buss is like calling a fader, panner, or mute button a buss as they're all just components of a channel.
 
These are good articles.

I'll read it for you guys :

"The term ‘bus’ strictly applies to any mix bus, but often it is used to describe an audio sub‑group, which is used to gather and combine a number of related sources to allow overall control via the bus or sub-group fader. Its output is often referred to as a ‘stem’ and typically forms a key part within the final mix. For example, you might ‘bus’ all the drum mics together to allow overall control by one (or two) faders, instead of having to juggle and balance six or more individual drum channel faders.





 

Latest posts