• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AUDIO TEST: Maple+Maple vs. Alder+Rosewood!

CAST YOUR VOTE HERE!

  • BASS 1 is brighter than BASS 2. The MIX clip is BASS 1.

    Votes: 13 6.6%
  • BASS 1 is brighter than BASS 2. The MIX clip is BASS 2.

    Votes: 37 18.7%
  • BASS 2 is brighter than BASS 1. The MIX clip is BASS 1.

    Votes: 74 37.4%
  • BASS 2 is brighter than BASS 1. The MIX clip is BASS 2.

    Votes: 43 21.7%
  • I can't hear any difference whatsoever!

    Votes: 12 6.1%
  • I can hear a difference, but I have no clue which bass is being used in the mix.

    Votes: 19 9.6%

  • Total voters
    198
  • Poll closed .
..If I swapped the Alnicos with Ceramics, you'd say the test was flawed because I didn't conduct the test with a goat in the studio.

Dan, I got the basses right, but missed on the mix. Now that I see you didn't use a goat in the studio, I don't feel so bad for picking the wrong bass in the mix, as your testing method was obviously flawed. :rollno:

Once again, thank you for putting the time and effort into these test. Alway fun and informative.
 
Dan, I think you need to invent a machine that magically changes one wood into another. Then you can play the EXACT SAME BASS with different woods. Aside from that there is nothing you can do that people won't be critical of.

Check that. You would also have to build a bass playing robot that plays exactly the same way every time to avoid any bias from human playing differences.
 
You can GET a flatwound sound out of roundwounds

Just like you can get an EB to sound like a DB?

For both: No, you can't.

+1

You can't get rounds to sound like flats. I've tried. All you can do is get them to sound like rounds with the tone rolled down.

Flats have a completely different vibe. They are the sound of a bass fully embracing itself as a bass, with no shame. They proudly declare their bass-ness without compromise. They do not try to pretend they are a guitar.

:hiding:
 
Let's forget about bright/dark, round/flat, purple/yellow for a moment...

The basses clearly sound different and I heard a much more solid fundamental in Bass 1.

I'm dying to know WHY! Bass 1 got the bottom end of the tone right in my mind. I can't speak for the top end because of the string choice...But the bottom end (for me) was right on bass 1.

So how 'bout it? Why do YOU think there's a difference in the basses and what made the bottom of bass 1 so much different than bass 2?
 
I only use round wounds. They make a lot of their own noise, noise that isn't influenced by the wood. Obviously they make sound that is influenced by the wood, but not all of it.

That's why I like broken-in rounds so much. That extra zing that they add to the tone is gone and all that's there is the tone of the bass, with nothing added or subtracted.
 
Dan,

I'm trying to get a bass that helps me achieve my goals. Since you're a builder who has at least in part hit my goals with a very specific instrument. I want to know about that instrument and why you think it hit that one aspect of my tonal goals.

As a builder, Why do you think Bass 1 sounds different than Bass 2?
 
Dan,

I'm trying to get a bass that helps me achieve my goals. Since you're a builder who has at least in part hit my goals with a very specific instrument. I want to know about that instrument and why you think it hit that one aspect of my tonal goals.

As a builder, Why do you think Bass 1 sounds different than Bass 2?

Excellent question.
 
For you. For me it's quite conspicuous.

Looks like it comes back to that personal perception and ability to hear the differences thing again. ;)



Looks like it comes back to you not grasping that the perception of your ears is influenced by your eyes telling you what you are playing, and that based on pure chance, a significant number of people will guess right in a poll like this, the salient point being that the overall numbers show no real difference between the 2 woods. Regardless of your belief, if you cannot provide any real evidence to support it, in the face of convincing evidence to the contrary, your argument is hollow and unconvincing, however boundless your persistence.
 
Looks like it comes back to you not grasping that the perception of your ears is influenced by your eyes telling you what you are playing, and that based on pure chance, a significant number of people will guess right in a poll like this, the salient point being that the overall numbers show no real difference between the 2 woods. Regardless of your belief, if you cannot provide any real evidence to support it, in the face of convincing evidence to the contrary, your argument is hollow and unconvincing, however boundless your persistence.

Yeah, I expected that. Fact is that people are different with differing capabilities.