TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've never had any other cable fail on me during a gig/rehearsal. ONLY Monster. Soldered cables? Why? I thought my speakers in my cabs were failing on me. Turned out to be the soldering on the cable came apart and were touching intermittently! I had to play direct only the rest of the gig. Back in the 90's I had a Bass cable that ruined the jack on my bass! Not to mention how frikkin' thick the cords are you can barely wrap them.

Wow! What a read!
I don't think I’ve ever seen anybody put their boot so far up someone’s butt as the guy who wrote that letter.![]()
Monster didn't care if Ken replied or not. Monster is just protecting its TMs. TMs and patents have to be policed. If you let people infringe on your TM, you can "lose" it. So bigger companies have to go out and assert their mark on infringers, or even barely-plausible ones, to have that record of maintaining it (for the day a real matter comes along). They also have lawyers whose job it is to monitor for these things, whip out the cnd, and then advise the business if it's something they really need to act on. If Monster actually thought there was an infringement, anything other than a "we'll stop immediately" would have been followed quickly by civil complaint. And sadly, much of what Ken said was very very wrong -- if he thought it was his retort that made the matter go away, he really should make friends with a lawyer for better advice. That said, it was probably very therapeutic to send the letter off. I went through this with a family's printing business when they got a cnd from Kinko's. The lack of similarity between the signage was hilarious, but I explained that wasn't the point. A detailed one-page reply mostly let US know Kinko's wasn't treating it as a serious infringement -- which was a big deal because the cost of fighting a lawsuit probably would have wiped their business out. I wouldn't be shocked if they got a letter from BlueJeans Network some day in similar fashion.
Yeah, I lost steam before I got there -- makes it much more interesting. I read another article about it, and the right word is "ballsy." And I took it to mean he thought MP HAD TO produce evidence in the letter before a business had to comply, but what he was really was saying was "you'd have to do all this to convince me." If I had gotten to the line "I would rather spend fifty thousand dollars on defense than give you a dollar of unmerited settlement funds" I'd have picked up on the tone hahaha All that said, it's still the case that businesses have to do some level of policing or they can lose their marks. Going after golf courses and clothing stores is bad (and does make for terrible PR) but they're not wrong when they say "the letter of the law that requires us to prevent the dilution of our mark risk losing it." I just think that gets lost in the shuffle. But I'm sure, now, that Ken knew this would be GREAT PR for his bizyou might have missed the part where ken explains his career as an attorney....it's shkreli-like. the mere tip of the proverbial iceberg: Monster Cable Caves Again, With Oddly Worded Apology there's much more like that to be found.
Off the shelf VOX “curly cords” ... been using them for years
Those are actually THE best cords for bass cause the curls cancel out noise (like twisted pair) for a cleaner signal into your amp.
I bet Monster didn't think about that!