A penny farthing
That's the one!
Real Men Ride Penny-Farthings
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A penny farthing
Based on some of your previous post I find this one quite confusingThat's the one!
Real Men Ride Penny-Farthings
Once again thanks for all the replies. I didn't actually ask for a short scale in particular tho. I can play a long scale no problem, it's the thickness of the neck, not the lenght that is the problem. I don't have super tiny hands, but they are small and i got short fingers. The Epi T-bird feels fine, so maybe a profile/thickness like that. It's a 2009 model so should be slim tapper?
I have never tried a short scale, the necks on them seems to usually be very thin tho? Would be interesting to try a short or medium scale, maybe Mustang, tho i'm kinda interested in an Gibson EB-0/EB-3 too.
Also try a Fender Jazz sized bass. Anyone know anything about the Necks on Jackson/Charvel Basses?
They are selling an 90's Charvel in my price range that i might be interested in, but i don't know anything about thease basses and seems to be very little info on them.
Using the bike analogy, Lance Armstrong (or insert your favorite PED-using pro cyclist here) could ride a bike of any size and beat the snot out of any of us. But, to get the most out of his talent, he uses a bike specifically fit to his dimensions. So, sure anyone can play any sized bass using proper technique, but matching that good technique with an ergonomically optimal bass in terms of scale, width and thickness will yield the best results.
Just get on with making bass notes...
... from a cello tuned EADG, ....
Truthfully, if you can find one, try the Gibson TBird SS. Might be the best feeling neck of all the basses I own. Thin, fast, has a good radius. At least for me it's very comfortable. Plus being a SS it balances perfectly while still sounding like a TBird since it uses the same pickups.
I was lucky to get mine for about $700, worth every penny.Oooh, I gotta find myself one of those someday...
... Actually it is more like the wheel size of a bike where within limits the size of the wheels does not have to correlate with the size of the rider. There are people with huge hands who prefer short scale basses and people with small hands who play a double bass just fine, thank you.
...
Dear me, don't do that! CGDA works fine on all my bass guitars, why screw up a cello with that silly tuning?!
Using the bike analogy, Lance Armstrong (or insert your favorite PED-using pro cyclist here) could ride a bike of any size and beat the snot out of any of us. But, to get the most out of his talent, he uses a bike specifically fit to his dimensions. So, sure anyone can play any sized bass using proper technique, but matching that good technique with an ergonomically optimal bass in terms of scale, width and thickness will yield the best results.
I did read the OP, but thank you very much for the nannying.
If small hands are part of the equation, alternative scale lengths should be worth serious consideration and part of the conversation, despite the cries of the Real Men Play Long Scale crowd.
And no one here said a person with small hands can't play long scale. Just like I could learn to ride one of those 6-foot-tall old timey bicycles if I wanted to, I could also play a long scale bass. I'd rather ride a bicycle that fits me comfortably, just like I'd rather play a bass that fits me comfortably. I prefer medium scale (I've tried 34", 32" and 30"). And I don't even have small hands.
Why not? Not silly at all.
Cycling is a more than a little different than playing bass. Put 'ol Lance on a bike built for a 6'5" guy and he's going to lose a lot of efficiency and probably suffer some joint pain. No, put him on a crappy component, wrong size, and poorly assembled Wal-Mart bike and your average local racer can beat him.
If small hands were truly limiting, only tall guys would be playing bass and short guys would be limited to guitar.
It is silly because a four string tuned in fifths has the range of a five string tuned in fourths. Plus half a step. Why give that up when you are already trained to play in fifths? If you want to down tune a cello to bass guitar range the sensible tuning is FCGD. Playing a "bass" tuned in fifths will encourage you to break all kinds of bass guitar rules. Tuning EADG just encourages you to play like all the other bassists.
Cycling is a more than a little different than playing bass. Put 'ol Lance on a bike built for a 6'5" guy and he's going to lose a lot of efficiency and probably suffer some joint pain. No, put him on a crappy component, wrong size, and poorly assembled Wal-Mart bike and your average local racer can beat him.
If small hands were truly limiting, only tall guys would be playing bass and short guys would be limited to guitar.
Using the bike analogy, Lance Armstrong (or insert your favorite PED-using pro cyclist here) could ride a bike of any size and beat the snot out of any of us. But, to get the most out of his talent, he uses a bike specifically fit to his dimensions. So, sure anyone can play any sized bass using proper technique, but matching that good technique with an ergonomically optimal bass in terms of scale, width and thickness will yield the best results.
Actually, guys, ol' Lance was high on drugs all the time...
...
OP, you know what they say about small hands, right?
...