thanks very much for the detailed responses.
on the back of my gk 400rbIII it says:
AVERAGE POWER 185W FULL POWER 500W
on the back of the 100W powered speaker it says:
AC 120V 60Hz 160W
so if i was doing a gig with just bass and vocals using these two pieces of equipment, i can estimate my power needs. i need to know the average power draw.
is my average power draw from these 2 pieces of equipment running simultaneously 185W + 160W = 345W? or is it 345 x 8 = 2760W?
instead of getting 2 jackery 300W's, probably makes more sense to get a jackery 1000w instead, or something similar. i'm pretty sure that will be beyond the budget for this little farmer's market, but i do want to get a clear understanding of the situation.
thanks again for your responses
The specs are not completely clear to me, so a certain amount of fudging is required. This is why I suggest being a bit conservative with your estimate. It's better to have more power than you need, than not enough.
For the GK I would base the run time on the Average power requirement. Also I would be mindful that the full power is right at the surge capacity rating of the Jackery 300. This suggest the amp could possibly cause the Jackery 300 to shut down if you crank the amp to clipping with a 4 ohm speaker. So essentially one Jackery 300 is a relatively safe bet for one 400RB as long as you explore the limits of the system and then keep your volume in a safe range.
I am able to run my GK 700RB wide open on my Jackery 300, but I am using an 8 ohm speaker so the amp was not making full power.
As far as the speaker power requirements, I suspect 160W is the max power rather than nominal power. You might find more specific specs in the manual. I don't know if this is intended as max RMS or peak.
If I understand, the 8 to 1 power relationship is comparing the nominal RMS power to the Peak power.
I believe the Jackery 300's surge capacity is expressed in RMS Watts rather than peak Watts. 500W RMS = 1,000W peak. If the Surge capacity is a peak rating I don't understand how it makes sense because 500W peak equals 250W RMS, which is less than the 300W RMS "continuous" power the Jackery is rated for. I could be wrong as Jackery does use the term peak power.
As far as whether one bigger power bank is a better solution than 2 or 3 smaller power banks. It depends on how they will be used and how you think.
The regular price of a Jackery 300 is $300 x 3 = $900.
They are currently on sale for $20 off.
300W continuous x 3 = 900W
500W surge x 3 = 1500W
293Wh x 3 = 879Wh
7.1lbs x 3 = 21.3lbs
The normal price for a Jackery 1000 is $1100.
1000W continuous
2000W surge
1002Wh
24.5lbs
The 1000 is more expensive, but can supply a bit more power. This could be important if you need to power something requires a lot of surge capacity. You can't link three Jackery 300s together in parallel. The 1000 is also heavier and you have to carry the entire weight. With the 300 you can break the weight into smaller loads. Or you can use each of them in totally different locations (more flexibility/versatility IMHO).
For this situation, I like the idea of having three separate power banks. Each person carries their own power bank. If one fails or runs out of power, you may be able to continue with the remaining two, although there would be reduction in available power. However, it might be safer to run all gear off one power bank and rather than having separate supplies.
Some of this is over my head and maybe @agedhorse will weigh in to offer corrections, clarification, or safety warnings.