$10,000 a week playing with lady gaga? don't count on it! if you made $2000 a week, i'd be surprised.
Considering thats about what I make in a month, consider it sufficient. That's what they make good in-ears for.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
$10,000 a week playing with lady gaga? don't count on it! if you made $2000 a week, i'd be surprised.
Let's say you were in an underground band that's being courted by a big corporate label. If you signed with them you'll be promised fame, fortune, and a fleet of supermodels. Instead of playing hole-in-the-wall clubs, you'll be playing stadiums. All you have to do is change your sound to more commercial viable pop music. Sign away your artistic integrity and all this could be yours..
would you sign?
Change vote option one to "Long hours on the road, double cheeseburgers, sleeping in a van when you are not driving with 3 other dudes, for a small chance to make some money since pirating music and the economy people dont go to as many live shows or buy legit music, to maybe break even and not owe the corporate label the money they loaned you to record and market your album". You are forgetting a key factor here, even if you sell out, people have to buy your music and merchandise for you to make the label money so you get a paycheck. Supermodels......lol.
whether you would or not isn't going to stop some idiot from the record company from trying to change you because "he knows what the kids want." he's a record company executive, so he has to know way more than you, right?If I were good enough, maybe I wouldn't need to change.
whether you would or not isn't going to stop some idiot from the record company from trying to change you because "he knows what the kids want." he's a record company executive, so he has to know way more than you, right?
and they really think the music business is in the toilet because of downloading.
I figured that would draw someone out. I'd submit that the music in the little holes is just made out of a different kind of plastic.
well 10 year old girls will always have horrible taste. they did when i was a kid and they do now. but i'd say that since the majority of top grossing acts for live work are considered oldies acts at this point, and cd sales are in the toilet except for a select few acts, i'd have to say they're really not.OTOH, maybe the kids are actually clamoring for crappy music?
right, and you saw how quickly they put it back together once the money ran out from the first run.The only band that I can think of that quit b/c they got to popular was Jane's Addiction. Past that, I assume you are playing music to "A" Make money "B" for the enjoyment, so combining both sounds like a win/win.
well 10 year old girls will always have horrible taste. they did when i was a kid and they do now. but i'd say that since the majority of top grossing acts for live work are considered oldies acts at this point, and cd sales are in the toilet except for a select few acts, i'd have to say they're really not.
I think the average musician has far more atrocious taste than the average 10-year-old. Kids that age aren't jaded yet, aren't trying to convince themselves that they're better than those "sellout" successful musicians, and aren't out to prove that they're smarter and more cultured than other kids who like other music. They still mostly want music to sound good and have lyrics about stuff that's interesting to them. Musicians, on the other hand...well 10 year old girls will always have horrible taste. they did when i was a kid and they do now.
you know, you make a convincing argument in favor of 10 year old girlsI think the average musician has far more atrocious taste than the average 10-year-old. Kids that age aren't jaded yet, aren't trying to convince themselves that they're better than those "sellout" successful musicians, and aren't out to prove that they're smarter and more cultured than other kids who like other music. They still mostly want music to sound good and have lyrics about stuff that's interesting to them. Musicians, on the other hand...
Didn't Evan Taubenfeld say in some interview that he thinks record labels should be run by teenage girls because there's more power in the lovers than in the haters, or something of that sort?
Come to think of it, at Saturday's gig somebody had brought a friend's 9-year-old daughter along, and I'd say the songs she was most into were the best ones. I even suggested that since we need to cut our material down to one 60-minute set for a corporate party gig coming up soon, we should play the songs she liked best, and our singers agreed.
you know, you make a convincing argument in favor of 10 year old girls![]()