• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Beginner Financial Investing.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/29/mag...debt.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007103013

Paying mortgages with credit cards??? What??? It is indeed suicidal to do that! Look at credit card rates in the US- if people are doing that, they're digging their own graves! Add to that the "protection" that the Congress gave the creditors in the bankruptcy overhaul bill...you CANNOT walk away from debt by declaring bankruptcy any more. You MUST PAY BACK ALL YOUR DEBT.

If it ever got that serious for me that I had to use credit cards to pay mortgage, I'd just go ahead and jump off a very tall financial building. BofA in downtown Houston is about 84 stories, I think...oughta be good for a bounce or two! ;):D
 
Smash Sept 25 2007 said:
Back to the theme of seeing trends emerging and profiting, today I call an end to the fad that is Crocs shoes. I bought $40 put options recently on the stock with a 2010 expiry. With luck, I may have actually caught the exact top. The stock was $67, and all trends come to an end ... and those shoes are damn ugly.


:hyper: Crocs stock down 35%. Today alone !

Invalid Link Removed



Also, think about the corrosive properties of seawater...what material would be a good thing to make parts from? Something that doesn't easily corrode in saltwater, and is ductile enough to be formed into the necessary parts to build a desalination plant? Answer to this question will be given in another post! :D

:eyebrow:
 
So, with everybody selling their stocks to lock in profits today, us little guys can take a big hurting. Seems like every stock I've been tracking went down.

That's why everyone has to hedge against uncertain markets and dodgy economies.

Even the little guy can do it. Options such as the ones I've been describing are very cheap - a contract in Home Depot is even today only $65 for $30 November expiry, meaning for every dollar it drops under $30 by November 17 you'll get almost 100% gains.

Only a couple weeks ago I paid much less for the same options, so I'm making almost 200% for every dollar it'll drop below $30. If that happens. You could also lose all of what you put in, but that's the price of insurance and the potential loss is totally limited to how much you choose to risk at the outset.

Maybe talk to your advisor about hedging strategies if today's action upset you?

US dollar sliding nightly, oil up, taxes will have to increase, no funding for gov't promises such as social security, foreclosures doubled since last year and increasing steadlily, record personal and public debt, unemployment rising, manufacturing & exporting decreasing, no end of massive losses and mismanagement on Wall St. ... that's not the kind of environment to be exposed to without some hedging for market collapses in my opinion.

I did very well today with the market tanking, and did very well yesterday with the market going up. That's without trading at all. I have longs in things that are going up, and am short things that are going down.

Even the longs you choose can be an effective hedge, especially if they're outside the US dollar and in sectors that tend to do well in bad economic times which is why I've stressed that repeatedly since the outset in this thread. The example portfolio I've been tracking was barely down a few dollars today, and probably went up in US dollars if factoring the currency echange. Today the Canadian dollar is at more than a 100-year high vs. the US.

There are also US longs which trade like regular stocks, but they go up as certain things go down. For example ticker SDS goes up twice proportionally to any drops in the S&P500. SKF, a favourite of mine, goes up double the amount of the drop in a basket of major financial stocks. These are ETFs, or you could think of them as a good hedging mutual fund which is not at the mercy of an "expert" with the attendant fees.


EDIT : Speaking of the currency, ponder too what this means when investment touts show charts that make the markets appear to be at all-time highs and rising. Try a 'net search for "DOW measured in Gold". That's right, if you measure the markets in real assets rather than collapsing currency the stock markets have been dropping since early 2000.

It's very important to know if you're buying into a bull or bear market. In recent years you'd need to make about 12-17% per year just to match inflation, depending on how you measure. It'd be nice to use the "official" figures but they're bogus numbers designed not to panic people. The official measures don't include the cost of food, fuel, or housing. And they also fudge numbers they do include. For example if a new computer cost $800 two years ago and it costs $800 today, they mark that as a $400 drop in price (no typos in this line, it's what I meant to write, odd as it may seem) because their "logic" is that computers double in power/capacity every couple years so you're getting twice the computer for the same money. Nice ways of "accounting" eh? END EDIT.


As it is with housing, a currency, or a fad company like Crocs, people can't kid themselves that things will always go up or that things will never collapse. And they can't just leave the work up to others, because this is what betting with the pros gets you :

"James Cayne, CEO of Bear Stearns, upset the wrong people... Today's Wall Street Journal featured a front-page article accusing Cayne of leaving work during the subprime crisis to play bridge and golf. While two Bear hedge funds were crashing, Cayne was allegedly playing in a bridge tournament in Nashville and "smoking pot" in hotel lobby bathrooms. The article also accuses Cayne of repeatedly missing work to play golf (without a cell phone) and worrying more about his vast Cuban cigar collection than Bear's shareholders. This is one of the worst hatchet jobs the Journal has ever published. Investors who lost hundreds of millions in the funds' collapse are going after James Cayne via the press."

Quite a lifestyle !

"After squandering 20% of shareholder's equity on toxic subprime-tainted investments, ousted Merrill Lynch CEO, Stanley O'Neal, will depart with a cool $160 million retirement package.

Merrill's board allowed Mr. O'Neal to retire, rather than giving him the boot for his dubious dealings in the risky subprime mortgage sector and for his not-so-clandestine merger talks with Wachovia, for which he did not seek the board's approval.

It was just 18 months ago when Mr. O'Neal hatched the brilliant idea of increasing Merrill's underwriting of collateralized debt obligations from a mere $1 billion to somewhere in the vicinity of $40 billion. The decision has, so far, resulted in Merrill swallowing the largest quarterly loss in it's 93 year history after its now-infamous $8.4 billion writedown last month."

:hmm:
 
So let's cut interest rates again and pump $41B in liquidity into the market, thus further propping up a system that is already horribly propped up (amongst other negative implications).

Ugh.


It's odd that this evnt, and your post about it, garnered no reaction. Very scary stuff, eh? Yet it's not front-page news, and most who might have heard a blurb about it have no idea of the implications. It's like hearing a train whistle nearby but not realizing you're walking along the tracks.

Riffing on that, with my own take on some examples that Bonner has recently made since he's so good at simplifying this stuff IMO ...

That's the biggest injection since the 9/11 events. And funny enough, rate cuts and liquidity injections are what caused all the problems now emerging. It'd be amusing to hear these "experts" explain how it's supposed to help, especially considering when there was an "Asian Crisis" about 20 years back the adivce "we gave to "them" was to just mark all derivatives to market value, or to zero if need be, allow things to collapse, and begin the rebuilding process. Same #### now, just the map looks different. Why don't "we" take our own advice?

Why do they announce it as if it's a good thing? As a warning to those who get it, is my guess. That move by the Fed, and the many recent ones like it, is a clear sign of desperation. We may see some major banks go under or need overt bailouts soon. These semi-covert bailouts can only go on so long.

Even funnier than this flailing by the Fed is their claim of a 3.9% growth is GDP. Not 4% but exactly 3.9% Sounds so precise, so it must be true. Then why all the panic injections of historic amounts of liquidity? They know their own numbers are fraudulent is why.

GDP is supposedly a measure of real output, calculated by subtracting the inflation rate from nominal output. That's the inflation rate which, as described in my post yesterday, is extremely fudged to get their artificially low 3% figure. The Economist recently calculated it's actually at 16%. Even if the truth is somewhere in-between, and any adult surely knows it's much higher than 3% 'cause in the real world you can't ignore the cost of food, fuel, and housing as the "officials" do in calculating the inflation rate, then that amounts to a contraction in "growth". What's the opposite of growth ... decay, isn't it?

And that's without even getting into the tragic comedy that is evident when 9/11 or a big earthquake results in a boost to GDP. Emergency workers and hospital staff work overtime, construction people get additional contracts, resources are bought and used/wasted, lots of funerals are paid for ... all somehow counted as a positive on the bottom line.

Further comedy comes in the fact that if a man mows his own lawn there's no increase in GDP but if he pays someone $500 to do it then GDP gets a $500 boost. Yet the only thing that's truly happened, in both cases, is his grass is shorter but only one example results in "growth". Maybe because he's spending instead of saving? If he put that $500 as an extra payment on his mortgage, that's not growth. Hmmmm.

Better yet, maybe he even had to borrow that $500 he paid for the lawn mowing and pay interest on the loan, in which case that's even more "growth" ! Maybe his wife has to put the kid in daycare and go to work to pay that debt, and that's even more "positive growth". And if they go bankrupt and divorce over this indebtedness, even more "growth" ! Lawyers are going to get paid to take care of things (will divorcing couples start fighting in court over who *doesn't* get the house now that many houses are worth increasingly less than what is owed on them?) ... maybe alcoholosim, a gun purchase and a suicide/funeral ... all growth and a big + for the GDP. Let the good times roll !!!

Yeah that's a decidedly dark view but it does happen, and how else to make the point very clear how ######-up the numbers are that they give us?

It's no wonder the Fed is so desperate. Not much time to get the lifejackets to those on the A-List while most people are busy playing shuffleboard on the deck of the Titanic.

If "the media" had a real liberal bias they could do just the slightest bit of work and totally crucify those in power right now - those from both sides. Heck it wouldn't even be a bias, it'd just be doing their jobs as reporters and as citizens but uh ... wot's that? Britney and Paris are at the top of the news? Oh ... too busy to attempt thinking now, gotta go check that out.
 
I would have posted about the $41Bn, but I was too busy trying to cool off the printing presses...

Just to see what the effect is, take a look at the currency exchanges, last I checked a few days ago, the dollar was worth 10.83 pesos. Today, it's 10.6835. Not a big difference, you say? One year ago, a US dollar got you about $1.20 CDN. Now it gets you $0.93 CDN. The dollar is tanking, and fast. After this Christmas season (which will be the skinniest in 20 years, I'm thinking), I wonder if the exchange rate will be $1.00US=$0.50 CDN? Chrysler just stopped production on three models, including the PT Cruiser convertible (no big loss there, except JOBS)....
 
I would have posted about the $41Bn, but I was too busy trying to cool off the printing presses...

Just to see what the effect is, take a look at the currency exchanges, last I checked a few days ago, the dollar was worth 10.83 pesos. Today, it's 10.6835. Not a big difference, you say? One year ago, a US dollar got you about $1.20 CDN. Now it gets you $0.93 CDN. The dollar is tanking, and fast. After this Christmas season (which will be the skinniest in 20 years, I'm thinking), I wonder if the exchange rate will be $1.00US=$0.50 CDN? Chrysler just stopped production on three models, including the PT Cruiser convertible (no big loss there, except JOBS)....

Actually according to the Royal Bank of Canada (who is the biggest trader of Canadian currency in Canada and maybe the world), the Canadian dollar is trading about six US cents higher than it should be. Seems that many people are dumping the US dollar and buying the Canadian dollar, thus falsely driving up the value Canadian dollar. That being said, the Canadian dollar is the best performing currency in the world over the last year, with an increase of 24% since January and 7% in the last three weeks. IMO the dollar will top out around $1.10 US and end up trading at par by the third quarter of next year.

lowsound
 
EDIT later in the day : Today I sold my SKF for a 30% gain in about a month. Invalid Link Removed It's an effective short that goes up proportionately double to the drop in US financials. That's the "hedging" I've spoken so much about, meaning despite the markets tanking lately I've made money thanks to that and ...

I still have SDS which is a similar 2x short on the S&P 500. I just thought the bearish sentiment was a bit overdone and there might be a bounce.

I also sold my MBIA puts for just short of a 400% gain in less than a month. Invalid Link Removed That's in addition to a 120% gain on the same play in early October. I'll reset that trade if it bounces back to around $40.

I've still got highly profitable puts in CFC Invalid Link Removed and HD Invalid Link Removed and in the case of HD I have to sell those by the end of next week when they expire. Currently I'm up about 300% on the HD puts and gaining almost another 300% for each dollar it drops below $30. The company's financials are due Tuesday, so that should be a big boon for me or wipe out most of my gains.

Of course I still have puts on GM too, so I welcomed today's news : "The former largest automaker in the world, GM, announced a staggering $39 billion loss in the third quarter."


-------


Actually according to the Royal Bank of Canada (who is the biggest trader of Canadian currency in Canada and maybe the world), the Canadian dollar is trading about six US cents higher than it should be. Seems that many people are dumping the US dollar and buying the Canadian dollar, thus falsely driving up the value Canadian dollar. That being said, the Canadian dollar is the best performing currency in the world over the last year, with an increase of 24% since January and 7% in the last three weeks. IMO the dollar will top out around $1.10 US and end up trading at par by the third quarter of next year.

lowsound


The Royal Bank can be as wrong as anyone. Brokers there chuckled at me when I told them emphatically a few years ago that the CDN dollar would rocket over 80c USD and be over par in coming years. They were adamant it wouldn't ever get over 80c. So, as with anyone, don't put too much faith in what they say.

That said, the USD is due for a bounce ... but I've thought so since the $1.00 mark. Either way, most of the relative moves will have to do with how the respective Federal Banks manipulate the exchange rates and printing presses so there's no real way to guess. If things were left as-is without gov't intervention, I'd be much more inclined to bet on Bassic83's sentiments (and it'd be "when" not "if") or Gisele Bundchen's (see below) than RBC's.

Even with gov't interventions, I'm quite certain that the slide in the USD is nowhere near done in the long term, since all unbacked paper currencies are shams.

Bloomberg reports that supermodel Gisele Bundchen now insists on being paid in any currency but US Dollars. When Bundchen, 27, signed a contract in August to represent Pantene hair products for Cincinnati-based Proctor & Gamble Co., she demanded payment in euros. Bette Middler did the same thing in the 70's and gold almost quadrupled not long afterwards.

Warren Buffett and Bill Gross, for example, both suggest selling dollars. "We've told all of our clients that if you only had one idea, one investment, it would be to buy an investment in a non-dollar currency," said Gross, the manager of the world's biggest bond fund. "That should be on top of the list."

Warren Buffett concurs. Just a few days ago, the Oracle of Omaha remarked, "We still are negative on the dollar relative to most major currencies, so we bought stocks in companies that earn their money in other currencies."

Super-investor, Jimmy Rogers, is even more blunt: "The dollar is collapsing."

And I've been saying this for years now, evidenced repeatedly in this thread going back nearly 2 years.


---------

“For the first time ever, investors consider Brazilian government bonds safer than Merrill Lynch bonds,” writes Eric Fry. Yesterday’s news of a certain Brazilian supermodel ditching the dollar must have pulled Mr. Fry’s attention away from New York and toward South America.

“According to the relative pricing of credit default swaps (CDS) on Brazilian government debt versus Merrill Lynch debt,” Fry notes, “the reeling American brokerage firm is a riskier credit that the resurgent Latin American economy.

Invalid Link Removed

“Buying five years of protection against a Brazilian default used to cost much more than buying five years of protection against a Merrill Lynch default.

“But now that Brazil has become as crisis free as the U.S. financial sector has become crisis prone, CDS prices have flip-flopped. Merrill CDS prices have jumped above those for Brazilian government debt! In other words, CDS buyers consider a Merrill Lynch default more likely than a Brazilian default.

“Maybe CDS investors have got it all wrong...or maybe the U.S. finance sector is in much deeper doo-doo than most investors believe. The ‘doo-doo’ interpretation seems more plausible.”

----------

EDIT later in the day :

“The world's currency structure has changed; the dollar is losing its status as the world currency,” said Xu Jian, a Chinese central bank vice director, yesterday. “We will favor stronger currencies over weaker ones, and will readjust accordingly,” confirmed Cheng Siwei, vice chairman of China's National People's Congress, at the same conference.

And that was all she wrote for the U.S. dollar.

While China has yet to formally announce a change in its foreign exchange reserves, the allusion was enough to spook traders. Here’s the breakdown:

Euro: $1.47 -- an all-time high versus the dollar
Pound: $2.10 -- 26-year high versus the dollar
Canadian dollar: $1.10 -- rose almost 2 cents in one day, a new all-time high
Australian dollar -- 93.9 cents -- gained over a cent overnight, to a new 23-year high
Yen: 113 -- gained a full point versus the dollar to 2-month highs

The dollar fell against every other actively traded currency… 16 in all. "

Putting that into TB terms, a NYC Sadowsky that cost me $3875 CDN in 1997 costs me $2250 today.

Invalid Link Removed

Anyone wanna guess what this means for the average US citizen that has to buy food, fuel, and housing, none of which the government includes in their fraudulent inflation figures? If houses stop doubling in price as measured in tanking dollars, how will people get into more debt so they can afford to eat?

As I've said many times before, keep an eye on the classifieds as a sign. There'll be increasing numbers of fancy gear going for increasingly lower prices and taking increasingly longer to sell. That's been the trend for a few months already, and last night I saw an advert by a TBer selling a new custom bass he rec'd just last month because he works in the mortgage industry and lost his job.

That's just the very tip of the iceberg of what's coming ...


------------

Why the Housing Sector Collapse Is Wonderful
By Porter Stansberry

Barrington is a subdivision in northwest Charlotte, North Carolina. The houses in Barrington are "tract homes..."

To save money, homebuilders like to develop entire neighborhoods of identical houses. Every house uses the same architecture, so they only need to draw up one set of blueprints. Every house uses the same materials, so they can buy materials in bulk and reduce waste. Construction is easy, too. Once you've put up one, you can build 1,000. So the developers don't need to hire skilled craftsmen to build these houses. They employ the same unskilled worker you'd find on a production line in Detroit.

You'll hear people call these houses "cookie-cutter homes."

Beazer Homes developed the Barrington subdivision. They jammed the houses close together on tiny lots and used the cheapest designs they could find. These tactics reduced the final sales prices and increased Beazer's profits. Houses in Barrington started at only $90,000.

Here's the thing, out of 107 homes in the Barrington, 41 are currently in default and will end up in foreclosure. Normally in North Carolina, fewer than 3% of home sales result in foreclosure. Something unusual happened here...

Beazer arranged the mortgage financing for 37 out of the 41 homeowners who ended up in default.

As the Charlotte Observer discovered, Beazer's mortgage employees were making loans to people who couldn't possibly afford the homes. Beazer completed the neighborhood in November 2002. The first foreclosure occurred two months later. Agina Anderson was the second person to default in Barrington. Anderson lost her home a year later, in November 2003. She was a 19-year-old single mother, working at a gas station for $8.05 an hour.

Everyone, individually, is responsible for whatever debts he incurs. I don't think it's right to blame Beazer for any individual default, and I certainly don't think borrowers should have recourse to sue lenders for making loans.

But look at the corporate culture Beazer established with these kinds of sales and mortgage policies. The company was essentially building a community it knew would fail. Putting so many very high-risk borrowers into one community meant, inevitably, the development would suffer a very high incidence of foreclosure. As a result, the value of the community would be destroyed.

By selling homes its buyers couldn't truly afford, the company was also inflating the sales and profit numbers it reported to shareholders. Worse, the company's culture of irresponsibility systematically destroyed the value of the company's brand and its reputation.

No one should have been surprised when the FBI began to investigate the company's mortgage practices, when the SEC followed with an accounting investigation, or when Beazer's chief accounting officer was fired in June.

Like so many of its customers, Beazer itself wound up in default. Unable to file regular SEC-required quarterly reports because of its ongoing investigations, it violated its bond covenants. Rather than admit its default and seek to compromise with its bondholders, as happens regularly in these situations, Beazer sued its own bondholders, calling them "vulture investors" in court papers. Astoundingly, Beazer denied it had defaulted on the terms of its debt – despite readily apparent facts to the contrary.

Beazer recently settled out of court with its bondholders, paying them $12 per $1,000 to delay action on the default until next May, by which time the company should be able to file reports again with the SEC. The company also admitted it had, in fact, been in default. But the company's culture of dishonesty and fraudulent dealing has already wiped out many shareholders – the stock has fallen from $80 to $8.


----------

Most of the above news tidbits were from The 5 Minute Forecast, which I've linked to many times as a "daily must read". As is this last bit ...

"Michael Jackson, the “King of Pop,” is on the verge of having the Neverland Ranch foreclosed. Apparently, the freak has defaulted on a $25 million loan.

Jackson’s loan was secured against the deed of trust for his 2,800-acre “private amusement” park. He has 90 days to fork over the $25 million or the ranch will be property of Delaware loan firm Fortress Music Trust.

Already tied up by multiple lawsuits and other loans, many speculators believe that Jackson won’t be able to keep the ranch, and might even declare bankruptcy."
 
I did note in a article this AM that Britney makes $737,000 per month, and saves 0$. I think that's all I need to know right there...

Still the queen of stupidity. If she put one month into a nice investment she could make absolute killings! Talk about your 300% option gain there.. thats what? 2.2 Million? Maybe she could pay her house off in two months and save herself another $49,000 per month, which she could easily put towards her "entertainment expenses."

Beauty is a dying, fleeting thing. Everything in this world will rot away and die. She's only got another 5 years with that body, she better make it work for her.

(off soapbox).

Anyone wanna guess what this means for the average US citizen that has to buy food, fuel, and housing, none of which the government includes in their fraudulent inflation figures? If houses stop doubling in price as measured in tanking dollars, how will people get into more debt so they can afford to eat?

Well from one person living at the poverty level to the rest of the world, here's my take on this.

$100 - That was our average grocery bill in 2004. We could literally fill our cabinets and eat for 3 weeks off that. We would leave around another $100 or so in reserve for fresh produce and dairy. So $200 a year ago got us well fed for 3 weeks. In todays money when we shop at the grocery store, $115 is a weeks worth of food, produce and dairy. And we're cutting BACK our eating as well, which means now I'm starving (which I am right now, starving at work but I cant afford to buy anything.) Monthly what did cost us $250 roughly, now costs us $450. Thats 80% more expensive!

Lets talk Public Assistance. I have qualified for it since 2003. In 2004, at $20,000 a year income and one Dependant, we received $480 a month in food stamps. Fast froward today, I have 3 Dependants and $26,000 income. I now have health care covering the whole family at no charge from my new job. Guess what I get for food stamps now.. its laughable. $148. One trip to the store. One weeks worth of food. My bills have tripled in price and my assistance has gone down 4 fold.

Lets talk fuel costs. In 2004, I can clearly remember being upset about 2$ gas, and that was the high price of the year. Now look, the market is testing the $100 price for a barrel, which WE WILL NOT RECOVER FROM. I'm paying around $36 a tank, where it was $26 a tank 3 years ago. Average gas price around town today is $3.09. Your talking 50% gains there.

Everything is so much more expensive. Television, which used to run $60 a month for digital plus, now costs $110 per month. 83.34% more. Electricity, my bill was $38 / month running 3 computers all the time in 2004. Fast forward to today, we're looking at 98$ a month, and my single laptop is 180w at full load. My multimeter shows a total load of around 40 watts average. We have also switched to all CFL light bulbs. I cant even calculate this gain but it seriously has my thinking its around 83% OR MORE!

How is it i'm supposed to live on the SAME PAY I MADE in 2004 with todays prices? I'll tell you how... starve. I'm not unemployed and i've considered selling all my equipment and giving up bass because I can't afford strings. Speaking of which, just 1 year later my appointment book is empty. When I go to bars to talk to the owners about why they are not booking musicians anymore, they tell me the business does not justify the expense. They have a Jukebox.

So I'm guessing the REAL inflation figure for the last three years is around 50% or more. The poverty level has moved from 2004's figure of $15,670 for a family of three to around where I'm at right now with my compensation which is $26,600 Gross, in 2004 I was making $20,800 and living a MUCH higher quality of life than where I'm at right now. I can only expect my pay right now to climb at a rate of around 6% / year MAX.

I really don't know how we can expect to live like this. I can manage to put 15% of my income away every year until it kills me because I need to. But with the rate that things are rising, I need to do more like 35% just to make up for this inflation. I'm not sure how it is for all of you, but here in Michigan we are starving. Literally. The best I can do is keep chugging away with the 15%, hope to God that my investments stay at 26% gain, eat less, cancel my cable, cancel or reduce my phone bill, which will mean no more cellphones and no more internet, and hope that the Giving Tree's bring home Christmas for my two beautiful kids.

Gosh.. the market is the LEAST of my concerns right now. The very least.

(ok really, off the soapbox.)
 
"Michael Jackson, the “King of Pop,” is on the verge of having the Neverland Ranch foreclosed. Apparently, the freak has defaulted on a $25 million loan.

Jackson’s loan was secured against the deed of trust for his 2,800-acre “private amusement” park. He has 90 days to fork over the $25 million or the ranch will be property of Delaware loan firm Fortress Music Trust.

Already tied up by multiple lawsuits and other loans, many speculators believe that Jackson won’t be able to keep the ranch, and might even declare bankruptcy."

Hey at least I'm ahead of the King of Pop!
 
...Well from one person living at the poverty level to the rest of the world, here's my take on this.

$100 - That was our average grocery bill in 2004. We could literally fill our cabinets and eat for 3 weeks off that. We would leave around another $100 or so in reserve for fresh produce and dairy. So $200 a year ago got us well fed for 3 weeks. In todays money when we shop at the grocery store, $115 is a weeks worth of food, produce and dairy. And we're cutting BACK our eating as well, which means now I'm starving (which I am right now, starving at work but I cant afford to buy anything.) Monthly what did cost us $250 roughly, now costs us $450. Thats 80% more expensive!

...

So I'm guessing the REAL inflation figure for the last three years is around 50% or more.

Kudos for knowing your expenses. Few people do. Those who do, usually do well with money over time and usually aren't the ones with the wool over their eyes when the "officials" talk their ####.

"Bingo" on the real inflation number. It's about 15% per year recently in the US, so 50% over the past few years in aggregate sounds about right. Expect taxes and electric and heating bills to start going way up too.

This chart about says it all. Invalid Link Removed

What it shows, is that while commodities have gone up about 50% the past few years in US Dollar terms (for those who don't know - commodities include the cost of oil/gas, and food such as wheat, of course neither of which is included in the gov't fraudulent inflation figures), but in Canadian Dollar terms the costs of those commodities have gone *down*. That's also true in Aussie Dollars, Thai Bhats, etc. etc.

This illustration goes in hand with my frequent arguments in the "gas price" threads over the years that it's much more about our own governments stealing from us and squandering our money an future than it is about "evil" oil companies and countries making the price (apparently) go up.


Ron Paul Schools Ben Bernanke Again



From today's "Rude Awakening" :

"$100 oil has arrived…give or take a dollar…and so has $800 gold…and $9 wheat. These shocking price tags do not merely reflect robust demand, they also reflect a runaway supply…of dollars.

One year ago, $100 oil seemed like a crazy idea. But you know the saying:

Truth is stranger than fiction. And the stone, cold truth is that crude oil supplies are depleting, while U.S. dollar supplies are increasing. When you combine these two trends, you get a much higher oil price…even a "crazy" oil price like $100 a barrel. We would not be surprised to see even crazier prices over the next few years…because we would not be surprised to see a much weaker dollar.

In other words, the skyrocketing oil price is as much a monetary phenomenon as a geophysical one. It is as much a story of dollar weakness as commodity strength."


...I really don't know how we can expect to live like this. I can manage to put 15% of my income away every year until it kills me because I need to. But with the rate that things are rising, I need to do more like 35% just to make up for this inflation. I'm not sure how it is for all of you, but here in Michigan we are starving. Literally. The best I can do is keep chugging away with the 15%, hope to God that my investments stay at 26% gain, eat less, cancel my cable, cancel or reduce my phone bill, which will mean no more cellphones and no more internet, and hope that the Giving Tree's bring home Christmas for my two beautiful kids.

You'll have good company soon in cutting back on frivolities such as cell phones and basses.


"Sales at retail stores rose 1.6% in October -- the worst October performance in 12 years. Not since 1995 has the U.S. seen such an unsuccessful October, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers.

Wal-Mart, the U.S.’ biggest retailer; Gap, the U.S.’s biggest clothing retailer; and Macy’s, the largest department store chain, have all missed their latest round of earnings forecasts. "This does not bode well for the upcoming Christmas season retail sector hiring or store expansion plans,” writes Mish Shedlock. “Wal-Mart has already announced a second reduction in the number of U.S stores it will be building."


I feel obliged to warn you that you will absolutely not be making 26% annual gains in the stock market, not even if measuing in tanking dollars. Most likely you'll lose a lot of money if you're staying in US dollar holdings and not hedging on the down side. Again, you'll have good company in that regard though.

Sorry about that, but I have to be honest in what I think.


Having recommended some hedges recently, I should now post in real-time the result. I closed out my puts today in the following, with all figures being gains in roughly 1 month. Home Depot for 700% and 400% respectively on two put positions, Countrywide Financial for 187%, US Airways for 220%, Continental Airlines for 114%, and Crocs for 70%.

I still hold a bunch of puts, and I'll reset most of these if I get the big market bounce I'm expecting over the next few days. I moved some of the proceeds into knocked-down uraniums that I had posted taking gains on weeks ago such as PNP and MGA.

Not bragging, just being responsbile in posting the result of the positions I'd said I'd entered. Also illustrating how it's done, and that it's fairly easy to do.

I wish you the best in your economic struggles. It ain't going to be easy, but it looks from this distance that you're taking the proper approach. Not a lot of options, really, especially if your eyes are open to what's going on.


I'll add 1000 shares of WGP.v which updates the sample portfolio to :

Code:
ticker.exchange    # of shares held    price paid    current price   % gain

BAY.v                  100               1.61           1.10             (31)
HPS-A.to               100              11.90          12.35               3
ER.to                  200                .85            .72             (15)    
RSG.v                  400                .17            .36              58
WGP.v                 1000                .385            

Cash $298      

[b]Net Gain to date per the trades in this thread is 128% in 20 months.[/b]

If measured in real terms for people in the States (factoring the slide in the 
US Dollar, since these holdings are in Canadian Dollars partly as a deliberate 
hedge against my now-realized prediction of a falling US Dollar, which has gone 
down significantly again in the past month against most major currencies by the 
way) it'd be approx +180%
 
Smash, thanks for the words man. Its great to hear from the perspective of somebody outside looking in and saying that I'm doing well, but this is not where I want to be. Unfortunately, everybody around me is dumb to these facts and I think for the most part they will continue to chug along at where they are and not notice except when its two days before payday and they have nothing.

I really appreciate your point of view and the book recommendation. The coffeehouse investor idea is waking me up to the fact that I should care less and make appropriate adjustments.

If you were me, and had an IRA from Edward Jones and a 403 from TIACREF, where would you be allocating your funds. I understand if you don't have time to answer, but a general opinion that could lessen the blow to my portfolio would be appreciated.

Their Funds are located here: Invalid Link Removed

I'm thinking of changing to a 50/50 investment in International Equity and International Equity Index, both seem to be returning above the market and doing great each year, and obviously will go nowhere but up with this market.
 
Anyone else get the willies when they stopped reporting the M3 index? I had a feeling that would be the clippers on the golden fleece...now the average Joe has to try to calculate how much fiat cash is actually in circulation, which is kind of like trying to determine the population of the US based on counting the number of cars passing 6th St. and Elm in Anytown, USA between the hours of 6am and 10am...not enough information. What the US government is doing is lying, cheating, and stealing like a common criminal. There is absolutely NOTHING backing the US dollar except debt- piles and piles of stinky, filthy debt. Now China is selling off the dollar, depreciating it even more. I look for the dollar to be worthless soon, perhaps in the next few weeks, if China dumps (which I noticed they are starting to do). Thanks, Fed.

That, and the fact that they restructured the bankruptcy laws so that only corporations may benefit from them. The average consumer MUST PAY BACK everything, and this was done before, and knowing FULL WELL, that the mortgage industry would be collapsing...what do you get? A financial crisis of unprecedented proportions. This makes the S&L crisis look like pocket change. We are NOT, IMO, heading for a recession in the US. What we ARE heading for, as far as I can figure, is a depression that will make the 30's look like the golden age. The real gauge of inflation to me, and many others as stated above, is what's left after the bills are paid. For far too many, it's a negative number. For me, it will soon become a problem if things continue along the current path. They don't report anything resembling real inflation numbers, they're invariably twisted and manipulated by the empty suits, and have no bearing on the reality of people in the US actually becoming homeless, losing jobs because they can no longer afford to go to work and still pay the rent, or food, or medicine for the baby...it's really getting far worse than the media will ever let on. And it will get worse, I believe. It's only a basketball-sized snowball right now, but it's rolling downhill and through many feet of snow!
 
...
I really appreciate your point of view and the book recommendation. The coffeehouse investor idea is waking me up to the fact that I should care less and make appropriate adjustments.

That one is Joshua's recommendation. A wonderful resource and good balance of passive and active investment styles.


If you were me, and had an IRA from Edward Jones and a 403 from TIACREF, where would you be allocating your funds. I understand if you don't have time to answer, but a general opinion that could lessen the blow to my portfolio would be appreciated.

Their Funds are located here: Invalid Link Removed

I'm thinking of changing to a 50/50 investment in International Equity and International Equity Index, both seem to be returning above the market and doing great each year, and obviously will go nowhere but up with this market.

I'm not very familiar with those, and can't responsibly or legally get into what someone else should do. I can say that I think the idea to focus outside the US markets and dollar is long overdue but not too late.

US markets have done the worst of the top-26 world markets the past few years. That trend will continue.

If it's retirement money, IMO it's crucial to be very diversified - ideally not even in stock markets, just split among various major currencies and gold.

Suggestions for investments and trends to consider abound in this thread, and I'll let the record speak for itself.



Anyone else get the willies when they stopped reporting the M3 index? I had a feeling that would be the clippers on the golden fleece...now the average Joe has to try to calculate how much fiat cash is actually in circulation, which is kind of like trying to determine the population of the US based on counting the number of cars passing 6th St. and Elm in Anytown, USA between the hours of 6am and 10am...not enough information. What the US government is doing is lying, cheating, and stealing like a common criminal. There is absolutely NOTHING backing the US dollar except debt- piles and piles of stinky, filthy debt. Now China is selling off the dollar, depreciating it even more. I look for the dollar to be worthless soon, perhaps in the next few weeks, if China dumps (which I noticed they are starting to do). Thanks, Fed.

That, and the fact that they restructured the bankruptcy laws so that only corporations may benefit from them. The average consumer MUST PAY BACK everything, and this was done before, and knowing FULL WELL, that the mortgage industry would be collapsing...what do you get? A financial crisis of unprecedented proportions. This makes the S&L crisis look like pocket change. We are NOT, IMO, heading for a recession in the US. What we ARE heading for, as far as I can figure, is a depression that will make the 30's look like the golden age. The real gauge of inflation to me, and many others as stated above, is what's left after the bills are paid. For far too many, it's a negative number. For me, it will soon become a problem if things continue along the current path. They don't report anything resembling real inflation numbers, they're invariably twisted and manipulated by the empty suits, and have no bearing on the reality of people in the US actually becoming homeless, losing jobs because they can no longer afford to go to work and still pay the rent, or food, or medicine for the baby...it's really getting far worse than the media will ever let on. And it will get worse, I believe. It's only a basketball-sized snowball right now, but it's rolling downhill and through many feet of snow!

Don't forget that gov't debt is now 9 Trillion. It won't be as simple as an immediate collapse though. Arguably we're overdue for a positive bounce.

We may eventually see an outright crash, Zimbabwe-style, but more likely it'll be the usual continual slide over decades with enough asset bubbles to trick people into thinking they're hitting the jackpot. Today's dollar is worth 5c (five cents) compared to a dollar about 90 years ago.

A crashing dollar wouldn't be such a problem if we still had a manufacturing economy because then exports would rise, but our big industries are in big trouble if they still exist at all. Like the gov't, General Motors couldn't come close to paying its debts if its creditors called 'em in today. But as with the gov't, the creditors know that so they won't. Instead they just won't keep lending, just as the Chinese won't be floating so much of our debt. The end result may be the same, but it'll take longer and those not paying attention won't see it happening.

Your points are very topical, as while I read your post I had these two articles from today's news open on my screen to read :

"Bankruptcy Law Backfires"
Invalid Link Removed

"Sarkozy Says Dollar Drop Risks Triggering Trade War"
Invalid Link Removed

"French President Nicolas Sarkozy told a joint session of the U.S. Congress the Bush administration must stem the dollar's plunge or risk triggering a trade war.

``The dollar cannot remain `someone else's problem,''' Sarkozy said today on Capitol Hill. ``If we are not careful, monetary disarray could morph into economic war. We would all be its victims.''

:eyebrow:


If you watched the video link in my earlier post, you'll have seen Bernanke answer some very pertinent questions with a cheap dodge about people who earn US dollars spending in US dollars so there's no problem. That's right up there with Cheney's cheap infamous lie that "deficits don't matter".

The truth is that the staples such as oil (gas) and wheat (food) are priced on international markets and the relative strength of foreign economies and currencies results in higher prices in US dollars for those staples, which Americans must pay to survive and of course the gov't does not include in their fraudulent inflation figures which allows their growth figures to be equally fraudulent.

Toys are imported, as are the big TVs, schlockbuster DVDs, most of our bass gear, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. The weak dollar means the prices will rise and/or corporate profits will shrink. And our grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren will still be paying for the debts "we" are racking up at the national level today. They'll wonder aloud, and probably not in English, how we could be so stupid and irresponsible.

Those reading this who don't like it, I encourage not to blame the messenger. History repeats, and the trends are self-evident. I didn't make the universe that way, but I do profit from it and anyone willing to make an effort can do the same.

It just takes more reading and thinking instead of repeat watchings of Star Wars pt. 5, part of a "Director's Cut" box set bought to replace the regular box set, especially enjoyable on the biggest of 4 TVs in the house, all of which, including the house, were completely bought on credit naturally. I'm not saying that's you, I'm saying that's sadly more the norm (credit card debt now totals a record $915 billion in the U.S.) than people thinking about what's going on.


Speaking of what's going on, here's the good news - Link Removed

And today's "The Daily Reckoning" (the bad ... I mean "accurate" news) is as always a must-read and very relevant to recent points made here.

An excerpt :

"The trouble with the financial world is that nothing stands still. We read in today’s paper that houses in the United Kingdom are down – for the second month in a row. During the housing bubble, British housing rose even more than in the United States; it probably has a lot further to go down.

But...what’s this...measured in gold, housing in the U.K. has been going down for the last three years!

Let’s see, if you measured U.S. housing in gold, the average house probably cost about 650 ounces in ‘97. Now, the same house costs only about 500 ounces.

And measured in euros, the average U.S. house cost about 250,000 in ‘98. Now, even after doubling in dollar terms, it costs only about 275,000 euros. After the costs of maintenance and taxes, the homeowner has lost ground .

But what do you care what your house is worth in euros or gold?

“Wall Street and dollar take another beating,” is the headline in the Times of London this morning.

Colleague Steve Sjuggerud forwarded a chart showing that real estate declines and bear markets on Wall Street always come together. “It’s only a matter of time...” says Steve.

Hold that thought, dear reader. And don’t worry. In today’s Daily Reckoning, we will clarify things. After a very long time when things seemed so very sure, when everyone knew the U.S. of A. had the world’s most dynamic, most profitable, and most secure economy ... when property prices were clearly going up ... when there was definitely a bull market in stocks...

...suddenly, the question marks are back:

- what is the meaning of the credit crunch ...?

- is Bernanke fighting inflation...or fighting deflation...?

- are stocks going up? How about the dollar? Is gold hitting another peak ?

- and what is ANYTHING worth...when EVERYTHING floats on a bubbly sea of shifting exchange rates?

Relax. Most of these questions are unanswerable, so don’t trouble yourself with them. Instead, let us look at a few things that don’t float. Let’s go back to the eternal verities...the North Star for investors.

There are a few things you can count on. Stocks always go down. Paper money always loses its value. Government always lies.

First, let’s look again at the dollar.

A couple of years ago, we dared to guess that the greenback would hit $1.50 to the euro. At the time, everyone thought the dollar would go down. Even Warren Buffett, who doesn’t like speculation of any sort, was betting against the dollar.

It seemed too easy. Too obvious. Markets don’t usually work that way. People rarely get what they expect, because what they expect is already reflected in current prices. Instead, markets usually surprise us.

How would the dollar surprise us , we wondered?

Either it would not fall, or it would fall much more than people expected. We guessed it was the latter. And so, it is turning out to be. Oil is already getting friendly with $100. Gold is getting very close to meeting up with its highest level ever – $850. And the euro is trading over $1.47.

Can you count on the dollar losing more value? Yes, you can. The dollar is the I.O.U. of the USA, a nation more deeply in debt than any has ever been. It’s a cinch to go down. Central banks around the world are turning to other currencies to stock their vaults. Celebrity models are demanding payment in euros. Investors are getting interested in gold.

But exactly how, when, and against what will the dollar decline? Oh dear reader, you’re asking too much.

But here’s another verity:

America’s middle class is getting squeezed.

“Homeowners Feeling Pinch of Lost Equity,” says the New York Times .

Diesel fuel and heating fuel are both selling for more than $3 a gallon.

And the Boston Herald reports that appraisers are now killing housing sales. They give their opinions just as they did before. But now, their appraisals are not high enough to get mortgage financing.

And now Ben Bernanke is warning of inflation. Hmmm... He told Congress yesterday that higher energy and higher import prices “put renewed upward pressure on inflation.”

What he meant to say was that he and his colleagues were destroying the value of the dollar, and people were beginning to notice.

Then, he went on with the remarkable line:

“We are going to make sure that the inflationary impact that may come from a weakening dollar is not passed into broader prices.”

How is he going to do that? If the dollar goes down, it will take more dollars to buy things. That’s what inflation is. Can you have inflation without rising prices; can you have a falling dollar in which the dollar doesn’t fall?

Mr. Bernanke did not venture into the metaphysics of it. Instead, he left the false impression that he and his sidekicks at the Fed were going to catch the buck in mid-air. Ha! They’re not going to catch it at all. They’re going to let it fall. We remember Paul Volcker; and Ben Bernanke is no Paul Volcker.

And so, dear reader, the story is getting more and more interesting.

The financial industry is sitting on something between $100 billion and $500 billion of as-yet-undisclosed losses. The Financial Times says the “crisis will get worse before it gets better.”

About 2 million American homeowners are set to lose their homes.

The dollar has already lost 10% of its value against other major currencies so far this year.

Americans’ most important asset – residential property – is going down at nearly 5% per year. Since property prices are in dollars, in world terms, the householder is losing about 15% per year. And yes, dear reader, housing will keep going down. There’s another thing you can count on. The typical family doesn’t earn enough money to buy the typical house. Either family incomes must rise, or housing prices will fall. Which will it be?

Which is more likely? Here, we’ll take a wild guess – uh...housing prices will fall.

And now, dear reader, here comes the other shoe – the drop in stock prices. Yesterday, the Dow was off a few points. It was down 360 points the day before. If this presages a general collapse in share prices, it means that ALL major forms of wealth and savings are in decline for Americans. Housing, stocks, even money in the bank.

The only things that are not going down are the cost of living...and gold.

Ben Bernanke implied that the Fed would not be lowering rates again...not any time soon. He’s not going to allow the cost of living to get out of control, he says. But if stocks slide, what else can he do?

One way or t’other, stocks are going down. Because real estate is going down. And because profits are going down. Profit margins are high now, for reasons we’ve explained in these Daily Reckonings. But profits never stay this high for long. They always regress to the mean. Besides, the growth in profits has come from financial activities, not manufacturing. Finance is peaking out. Wall Street itself is selling off. Goldman, Merrill, Morgan Stanley... these dogs have had their day. Now, they’re on their way down, and so are business profits, generally...and so are stocks.

Want some other sure things?

The middle class is sinking. Houses are going down. Stocks are going down. Isn’t that enough?

Okay, how about this: inflation, worldwide, is picking up . There are many more people with much more money in their pockets than there were a few years ago. Wages are rising in the East. Prices for basic materials and food are soaring. Soon, the asset inflation we’ve seen over the past few years will give way to consumer price inflation. Not just in the United States, but worldwide. "
 
dangnewt & GregC, you'll recall our recent discussion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

... Almost by definition, the sub-prime market means loans that Fannie and Freddie won't buy. (They have dipped their toe in so called Alt-A loans but these are still loans that require people to have verifiable income.) Fannie and Freddie's portfolios are solid because they know how to properly recognize and price risk.

"Without Fannie Mae, mortgage-lending practices wouldn’t have gotten crazy."

I have to agree with dangnewt. The subprime debacle is capitalism run amuck, while Fannie and Freddie have been under regulators' scrutiny for several years. Unfortunately, such factors run counter to the laissez-faire, anti-government stance some of these "financial doom" sites tend to take, so they're not likely to acknowledge them.:hmm:

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed



http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071120/earns_freddie_mac.html

"The mortgage crisis intensified Tuesday as Freddie Mac, the nation's No. 2 buyer and guarantor of home loans, posted its largest quarterly loss ever and warned that it may need to curtail its business unless it can raise fresh capital.

Freddie Mac lost $2 billion in the third quarter, much more than Wall Street was expecting, primarily because it needed to set aside $1.2 billion to account for bad home loans. "


While I covered my shorts in these two stocks some time ago, for very little profit, I can't say I'm surprised. Are those beautiful charts or what? Suitable for framing, and yet another great example of why government has no business in this business. I say again that "history repeats".

Sold my LOW (Lowes Hardware stores) puts yesterday for 90% gains since early October, and going to take 50% gains in Sunpower puts tomorrow (less than a month's holding time) to add to 106% gains on Sunpower calls made earlier this month.

Currently looking for some kind of rally in the markets, but I'm holding on to my General Motors, Bankrate.com, and Consumer Spending and Transportation ETF puts. The US dollar has been rallying and gold has been falling as I predicted recently (above), but both will resume their previous trends soon enough.

--------

"They get our oil and give us a worthless piece of paper," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told his OPEC cronies on Sunday. OPEC’s 13-member cartel met over the weekend, and the decline of the dollar was clearly on the minds of its ministers.

"All participating leaders showed an interest in changing their hard currency reserves to a credible hard currency," Ahmadinejad said. "Some said producing countries should designate a single hard currency aside from the U.S. dollar... to form the basis of our oil trade."

"Don't you see how the dollar has been in free-fall without a parachute?" chimed in fellow nutjob and OPEC minister Hugo Chavez. "The empire of the dollar has to end," said he, urging his OPEC brethren to shift to the euro.

Note the curious use of the word "empire".

---------

The Taj Mahal, along with 120 other Indian tourist sites, will no longer accept dollars to pay for admission. The Archaeological Survey of India announced this week that a fixed rupee rate will be the only method of admission to the Taj and other sites.

The greenback has lost over 12% of its value to the rupee year to date.
 
Freddie has traditionally been more willing to take on risk than Fannie. I didn't realize that they were buying the subprime paper. Not a smart thing to do at all.

Is the chart driven by fear or greed and how do we make money off of this? That kind of drop looks like fear - can greed be too far behind at prices like that?
 
It looks like a knee...the chart, I mean...

Probably is fear. The S&L fiasco is stll in the back of investors minds, and rightly so. Some even remember it firsthand. I'm thinking banking stocks will see a huge rally in June-July of next year, maybe a little later. Once people realize the sky isn't falling, but making a sharp downward correction, I think investors may indeed jump back in. I am wondering what the recent rally of the dollar the past few days is driven by, seeing as how the price of oil is up again, and may even go higher short-term.
 
It's quite funny to look through this thread... Almost everyone thinks that he understands the market better than most of others, pretty much like everyone thinks that he's above-average driver.

Guys, technical analysis just doesn't work, including the most basic one like "buy low sell high". There were bazillion of studies trying to find patterns in stock behaviour, and there are none. All the technical analysis stuff in practice tries to sell you a dream. The truth is that there's no way to systematically recieve above-average profits from stocks (with an exception of having an inside info from a company). If you don't believe me, try to find info about market efficiency.

The investment with the lowest risk/profit ratio is the market portfolio. Conclusion: invest in indexes.

And also: in the case with the house presented here, time value of money is totally neglected.
 
It's quite funny to look through this thread... Almost everyone thinks that he understands the market better than most of others, pretty much like everyone thinks that he's above-average driver.

Guys, technical analysis just doesn't work, including the most basic one like "buy low sell high". There were bazillion of studies trying to find patterns in stock behaviour, and there are none. All the technical analysis stuff in practice tries to sell you a dream. The truth is that there's no way to systematically recieve above-average profits from stocks (with an exception of having an inside info from a company). If you don't believe me, try to find info about market efficiency.

The investment with the lowest risk/profit ratio is the market portfolio. Conclusion: invest in indexes.

And also: in the case with the house presented here, time value of money is totally neglected.


What's funny to me is that you're not only apparently one of the people "thinks that he understands the market better than most of others" but on top of it your post is so utterly wrong.

"Time value" essentially exists because of inflation which along with opportunity cost, which covers interest you could earn with money, has been discussed a lot.

While typical T/A as found in most books on the topic or as seen on late-night infomercials hawking some kind of "Quit Work and Become a Forex Trader" program is utter rubbish, I do consider my self-developed methods of technical analysis an integral part of what I do, and I'll let my record speak for itself since you've read the thread.

History repeats, and just because you apparently can't find profitable patterns doesn't mean that none exist.

As for investing in indexes, I expect much better from my money and time, and I achieve it. Further, I like to learn about and understand what's going on, and passive "investing" in indexes or mutal funds teaches one nothing.

Checking your profile, I note that despite me being under 40 I've been beating indexes - sometimes by multiples - every year you've been alive. Arguably, real inflation has consistently beaten them as well. Either way, based on my experience I can assure you that the efficient market idea you cite is a crock.


"According to EMH, as prices respond only to information available in the market, and, because all market participants are privy to the same information, no one will have the ability to out-profit anyone else.

In efficient markets, prices become not predictable but random, so no investment pattern can be discerned. A planned approach to investment, therefore, cannot be successful.

This "random walk" of prices, commonly spoken about in the EMH school of thought, results in the failure of any investment strategy that aims to beat the market consistently."


I'd say maybe 10% of market participants - including insiders and pros - have even a clue, so while "all market participants are privy to the same information" it's also true that all bassists have access to practice time and lessons but that doesn't mean some can't totally outplay others. Some can't be bothered to learn or put the effort in, and many just can't "get" it, as it is with the vast majority of "investors".

How else do you explain the fact that in market selloffs some companies trade for significantly less than their net asset value, or that during manias people will pay hundred$ per share for companies with no assest or earnings whatsoever, or that plenty of people put their life's savings into obvious and provable scams? How efficient is that?

It isn't at all efficient or even sane, but it happens regularly and has happened regularly over centuries and that's one of the patterns I refer to and profit from significantly. Anyone posessing a bit of brains, a lot of common sense and discipline, and a good work ethic can do it too. That's a small minority of people, but they do exist and those who apply themselves to real investing prove the "efficient market hypothesis" quite wrong.
 
On the contrary to what you seem to think, I do NOT think that I understand the market better than everyone. If I did, I wouldn't have been where I'm now.

If it really requires "a bit of brains, a lot of common sense and discipline, and a good work ethic" to outperform the market, why no research has shown any result, thus making the efficient market theory as accepted in academic circles as the Relativity Theory? So, all the financial models are based on a "crock"? With all respect, I don't think that you're smarter than the rest of the world. As for bubbles of all kinds, they derive from wrong pricing of assets, and at the end the price returns to the real one. Anomalies like "january syndrome" and "bad monday" do exist, but can you consistently profit from them?

Consider a game when a coin is flipped and if you get heads, you earn $1.5, and if you get tails you lose $1. After playing the game daily for a year, I will be truly surprised if you're be able to discern between a graph of the game balance, and a graph of an average stock.

As for real inflation "outperforming the indexes"... Give me a break, this is ridiculous. Dow has grown from 2700 in 1991 to 13000 today. So, has the real inflation exceeded 450%? In this case, 25K salary then would be better than 100K salary today.