Thanks, Jim! Just loving the B/Amp and all of my Bergantino cabinets!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
OK. Just playing around but not LIVE I liked Dist1 set 5 and 5 for Crossroads. This was with a Peavey Cirrus 4 string and the Bergantino HG310 cab pair. But, unfortunately, I didn't sound like Jack.Please let us know what setting you use for Crossroads, and how much you felt it nailed Jack's tone (or not).
OK. Just playing around but not LIVE I liked Dist1 set 5 and 5 for Crossroads. This was with a Peavey Cirrus 4 string and the Bergantino HG310 cab pair. But, unfortunately, I didn't sound like Jack.
I wish Jim could put in a setting called "Sound & PLAY like Jack Bruce"No worries, no one does.
But, thanks for your guidance. It's a song I play from time to time.
Working on it! ;-}I wish Jim could put in a setting called "Sound & PLAY like Jack Bruce"![]()
Hey there everyone,
I wanted to share some exciting news. I've had the fortune over the last couple of weeks to work very closely with Jim, lend him my ear and help him develop the next set of drive circuits. First off, why was I chosen? Simply put, I asked. Being in 4 bands (1 original and 3 cover) I have the opportunity to practice, rehearse and gig out very often. I'm also a firefighter which translates into…I have a lot of time on my hands and, I think, Jim wanted to take advantage of that.
Jim really gave me complete liberties to start from scratch. One thing I didn't want to change was his overdrive circuit. I'm a tube guy and I really think his existing OD does an incredible job of capturing that vibe….from soft clip purr of a push preamp to the sag of power section at song. However, the approach to the two distortions were somewhat different.
For the first circuit (I'll call it Dist1 for now), we wanted to capitalize on the clean punch of the fundamental not getting lost when you engage the distortion. So that's really what it emphasizes…the clean. As you turn up the drive the harmonics continue to get louder and well as the clean. There is a balance that you can definitely get with the drive and volume but think of distortion 1 as really emphasizing the clean tone much like a good studio two track on bass engineer may in a recording scenario. You have all that fundamental and the "dirt" just adds some nice life and harmonic complexity to the tone. An example of this would be the bass tone in this video. I think it captures perfectly what Dist1 can do at a mild setting. It can get much hairier though if needed, trust me.
Distortion 1 example:
I've tested this numerous times in the band context and, the way Jim has designed this drive circuit, you lose ZERO low end when you add the dirt…..as in nada.
For the second circuit, we wanted to get a little more in the fuzz territory without going full fuzz. More of the high end of the gain being like a Beastie Boys "Sabotage" style. The lower drive setting of (we'll call this Dist2) 2nd circuit can sound more like this P bass in this Big Data song. Just wanted to give you these songs for frames of reference.
Distortion 2 examples:
With Jim's Dist2, both these tones are easily achievable. It can go from very mild to flat nasty and killing small animals at 50 feet, etc. The exciting thing about this drive as well is there is really no loss in low end. Dist2 definitely does emphasize the distortion leg more but there is plenty of clean tone mixed in so when you "step on it" it's not a "bass be gone" situation. Plenty of presence and fundamental in the mix.
I'm super excited for all three circuits. You really have 3 distinctly different circuits that go from mild, pushed tube to wild all out jagged gnarliness. But all 3 of these circuits have a workmanlike approach to being totally useable in the mix. The over the top fuzz, etc. is going to have to be attained by using a pedal, etc. Remember, we're talking about the simplicity of a 2 knob overdrive. Certainly some compromises had to be made but I cannot wait until you guys hear these new distortions.
That in concert with the other firmware upgrades like bluetooth footswitch, 3 memory slots, overlapping semi-parametric EQ, etc. just make the B|Amp such a winner. The pedalboard has been staying at home lately. Bass>Amp>Speakers
Again, I'm very honored to have participated in this project and really hope you guys like the direction that the new distortion circuits went. I tried to play them with as many passive and active basses that I could (J's, P's, Spector's, Yamaha's, etc on and on) through a variety of different cabinets and headphones. Realize all basses react a little differently to drive but there should be enough adjustability to get some great tones from every bass on the planet.
I'm sure Jim can chime in on the more technical stuff if he wants. I pretty much just lent him my ear and thoughts over the last couple of weeks. The process was just mind blowing actually. I'd give him feedback, either via email or phone and I have another file to try in about 5 minutes. At one point, when something wasn't quite right, Jim sent me another in the middle of a gig and I did a "hot swap". Just amazing. Jim has been such a pleasure to work with. As most of you know (and I found out), he lives, eats, sleeps and breathes this stuff…..weekends, late night, it didn't matter…he was tweaking. It was honestly like having my own personal distortion wizard on retainer.
I'm going to invent the "Jaco Box". It won't make your bass sound like his or make you play as well as him it will simply play audio files of him and you can stand there and pretend you are Jaco.I wish Jim could put in a setting called "Sound & PLAY like Jack Bruce"![]()
I think it's a good idea but would opt for individual control of each band as it allows more options. I would be okay with it and think you should follow the overall consensus but my vote goes for maximum versatility.
I think my "tone chasing" days are over. I just received my new B|amp and set of REF210 and REF112 cabinets. Just fantastic. More to follow as soon as my head stops spinning.
Yep, while narrow cut and wide boost are the most likely scenarios individual choice is the most versatile.Jumping in a little late on this topic, but I agree with Stu in that a fully parametric EQ, with individual Q width selections for each tone filter, would be the most versatile. I can think of a scenario of a midrangy, muddy/honky bass (like a lot of Fenders I seem to love for some reason!) where a wide deep mid cut is needed to smooth it out, then a narrow upper bass boost to bring back some of the fundamental in the G string that was cut off, and a medium upper mid boost to give it some bite. It sure would be fantastic if the Tone Control Q Select screen in the program menu were instead 4 separate screens - BASS Q Select, LMID Q Select, HMID Q Select and TRBL Q Select. I know Jim has stated previously that there are some limitations in the infrastructure that make this difficult, but this is the B|Amp Infinite Wish List forum right?![]()
@SteveC , what are you using on your board right now?
You could go powered monitor and use the set up you have or use a B|amp as a preamp/di for IEM's (nothing wrong with running the B|amp without a speaker load).