TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
He's great no matter who he's with or by himself.I was lucky enough to see Jean Luc Ponty
open up for Rennaisance in 1978. One of my
favorite shows ever.
So I thought about this and it reminded me that, I’ve always been grateful for NeoProg filling the void that The Death Of Prog left in the 80s left.Since this has morphed into a prog thread... anyone here think that a lot of neo-prog still sounds tainted by the 80's? I know they're not big anymore, but I remember thinking that about Spock's Beard, and it's why I can't stomach Dream Theater. There's something about the vocals and some of the guitar and production in neo-prog that sounds straight outa 90125 or some hair band. Anything that Billy Sherwood seems to be involved in has that sheen, too. I've always been of the classic prog mindset. The genre just stopped appealing to me when the big 80's sell-out happened.
Of course, I fully expect a tirade of arrows coming my way after this one. I've just seen the 80's as the decade where music got crappy and it really tainted the prog genre in ways I don't like.
All just taste and opinions, though, your mileage may vary.
With respect to largely unknown contemporary prog, check these guys out live in the studio--is it just me or are they pretty freaking good?
I like this - a non-Prog band that does some Prog, like what I said about Ambrosia.Early Mahogany Rush dabbled in some prog.
[/MEDIA]
I also really liked Passion Play when it first came out. While it's not as consistent as Thick as a Brick, the high points were great, and artistically it was something of a logical progression from TAAB. The synths and soprano sax worked really well - it's a shame Anderson didn't develop the sax more. I felt really let down when Anderson listened to fans and critics and went back to writing simpler songs, but he was a pro and he saw himself working for his audience, not for himself. His recent solo work, in TAAB Too and Homo Erraticus,. is actually remarkably good (and proggy).Funny how a lot of people didn't like that album. I am / was a Tull fan since Aqualung came out, and while I prefer Glenn Cornick way more than the rest, when this album came out I was knocked out by it, still am. It felt strange to hear such cool synths in JT, but it just works so well.
Some parts. He has a history of creating soundscapes.
Odd or not it's there and represented a side of his work. Didn't claim it was the epitomeRight, but A) his "history of creating soundscapes" (to use Fripp's own nomenclature) postdates the release of Exposure by over a decade, and B) the parts of Exposure that would qualify as "ambient" constitute maybe 5% of the entire album. The rest is mostly pretty aggressive, in-your-face post-punk progressive rock, plus three pop ballads.
I don't disagree that Fripp's been involved in some very ambient musics, both before and after Exposure; just noting that Exposure -- which certainly belongs in a thread about prog-rock -- seemed an odd selection to cite when the discussion detoured towards ambient music.
I dug that, prog with sax! Amazon has their album...…../gets credit card out.....
Anybody into Gong?