When I got the 46, I was looking for something versatile and one-hand-schleppable I could use for practice at home, practice with people, and playing smaller rooms. It's not as small as a compact 1x12" and it's a good deal louder, but Mike did say it would "get going" earlier in smaller spaces and at lower volumes than the 112. To my ear, it does, though I have a hard time quantifying exactly how much earlier. I think that this would translate to "loading up" a small space less than the MAS 112, but, again, don't know how to quantify that.
I've never overloaded the room on a gig with the 112, but playing a quiet blues jam in a small space once with it and my GBE 1200, I didn't feel like I could get the cab or the amp going properly -- total overkill and I felt a bit silly, yes. It sounded good, but not at its best. For reference, I think I could've covered that jam with 100 Watts and decent 1x10" -- for sure and easily with my little Markbass 121P combo (have covered bigger and louder with that little amp in the past).
The 46 feels and sounds different than the 18 Sound 112. Could be nice for a contrast, but isn't "the same but smaller". Last time I talked to Mike he said that the new 109 would be more similar to the 112 vibe -- we didn't go into detail about it, but something to think about, depending on what you're looking for.
Thnx for the description.
I'm pretty sure I've over-pressurized/loaded up a room on a couple occasions with my MAS112. As (I think it was Steve R and others) some folks mentioned there's a loss of clarity when you hit that point. Still sounds as good as the conventional cabs I've used, but not that "mastering room" kind of quality to the bass, in the live mix. Most times the MAS112 is perfect for the rooms I'm working, but I'd like to have a smaller cab that I can push sufficiently for the smaller rooms.
(Scratching his bald head...) So Ima gonna save up for a smaller cab for smaller rooms. 'Sall good!


