An investment that requires timing is but speculation, of no value to mankind.
Unfortunately markets are intrinsically valuable to humans as a means to generating wealth.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
An investment that requires timing is but speculation, of no value to mankind.
I don’t dispute that. Investing in businesses is fine. The activity of 'buying stuff in the hope of selling it for more than it's worth now before it drops to what it's really worth' is unproductive.Unfortunately markets are intrinsically valuable to humans as a means to generating wealth.
Currency must function as a medium of exchange. In this BC fails.I think one reason the stock market goes up up up over time is because it is the big casino. Vegas.
But an emerging vehicle such as this crypto coin could be like riverboat and indian casinos soon, i.e., a threat to the big boys.
Tulip or new currency? That is the bet...fascinating.
I don’t dispute that. Investing in businesses is fine. The activity of 'buying stuff in the hope of selling it for more than it's worth now before it drops to what it's really worth' is unproductive.
Currency must function as a medium of exchange. In this BC fails.
guys, just think of it as a gamble / game. don't make it into your daytime job. I know guys that did this and they all burned out in less than 8 years. Most of them became dirt poor after they gambled everything away.
The trick is to make a little bit money all the time and lose very little, if not any. Don't go for all the marbles. People take investments way too seriously.
"Never bet more than you can afford to lose."
Just take the average. It's something like 3 years if I remember correctly. Just go by that. The problem arises when people think that the market will push higher and higher. If you don't chase the bubble till the very end, practically anyone can make money in it.
Taking the average gives you the length of the average bubble, but not any specific one, so isn't very useful.
what I am trying to say is this: long story short, you don't have enough data so you use old data from other bubbles. Make educated guesses. Burn brighter and shorter, now this is the law of nature. You figure it has had a meteoric rise. So just take that into consideration and invest not only in crypto but in other areas. And always have dry powder in your keg because bubbles in investment happens pretty frequently.
Saxon bank makes yearly predictions and these guys, although not that accurate all the time is predicting that bitcoin will reach 60,000 and then crash to 1000 because of government intervention.
Their prediction for the JPY is 150 then crashing to 100. Part of this prediction goes hand in hand with other cyclical analysis that I read. And I am reading paid news. Not some cheap ones but expensive ones that people count on to make lots of money.
Saxon may not be too far off or totally crazy, they make money through investments. If bitcoin goes up , so will the attack of the hackers. Electricity consumption will go up and eco warriors will start to raise serious concerns, as well as governments around the world. All this and many more issues could be brought up that might force governments to intervene.
For now as many others have stated, it can not be treated as a currency. More like digital gold. It is just too volatile. Keeping that in mind, it is a gamble. For now its too dangerous to be considered a currency. so take it as that. Many haters of crypto don't understand anything about crypto and blockchain. Treat it as any investment and you don't have to worry if its in a bubble or not.
Taking the average gives you the length of the average bubble, but not any specific one, so isn't very useful.
then let me ask you, what do you think is a good method? other than staying out of the market.
I just realized, if you can not specify the average length of the bubble, in essence you are saying that it is not even a bubble since you can not even recognize it as a bubble?
No, I am saying the average of an average bubble is not necessarily a guide to the length of any particular one. I'd suggest median rather than average anyway, and it is something you could measure, but you'd maybe want to restrict things to a sufficient size for comparison