• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Body depth

Several potential problems come to mind right off hand.

1: The body could be too light resulting in neck dive.

2: Many pots and switches are around an inch thick or more so it would definitely limit your choice in electronics and wiring.

Thats just what I think of immediately. Not to say it cant or hasnt been done but some serious design issues need to be worked out in advance.
 
Typically I like doing 1 1/2" or less thickness, just need a slightly smaller headstock.

Doing a 1" or 1 1/4" body, would require you to make the pickups and hardware a little more "external" to the body (pickup routes and cavity routes are shallow)........ as far as neckdive is concerned, if it's headless, no problems there, unless it's a heavier body wood (for a headstock). As far as pots, you'd need to use a "bourns".....:

ptd90_lpart.jpg
 
1 1/4" works fine. The biggest issue is the input jack can bottom out if the electronics cavity is not deep enough. Same for some active electronics. A mounting plate for the jack is an easy way to compensate to allow it to stand up higher off the body. Keep the headstock light where balance is concerned.
 
Stone Age said:
1 1/4" works fine. The biggest issue is the input jack can bottom out if the electronics cavity is not deep enough. Same for some active electronics. A mounting plate for the jack is an easy way to compensate to allow it to stand up higher off the body. Keep the headstock light where balance is concerned.

This is true, although, if it's a side mount jack (bullet), this can be remidied. However, most bullet jack holes are slighly less than 1/2" od, 1 1/4" is still pretty tight.

Spector euro nt and ns style nt basses don't have cavity resesses, for the extra space saved with no recess.......
 

Latest posts