• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Boss GT-1B ... Arrogant? Stupid? Definitely unusable live.

Agree.

And it's not just the quality of the effects in a multi-effects unit - it's the signal flow. Most multis don't let you rearrange the inputs and outputs. So you're locked into whatever standardized sequence of effects their sound designers think sounds best. Since I sometimes do non-standard positioning of individual effects within my signal chain, not being able to put something in front or after something else of my own choosing is a major deal breaker for me.

I know there are now some of the newer multi-effects that do let you custom design your own signal chain. But even with that you're stuck with the effects you're given. If you want a different modulation or delay device, or something the designers didn't anticipate you wanting, you're out of luck. And forget about anything analog either. It's all digital in the multi-effect world.

As for me, I'll stick to my basket of patch cords and my "does just one thing - but does it exceptionally well" collection of gadgets. That just seems to work best for me. No knock on multis. They're just not my own particular cuppa.

Seems the MS-3 you can plug in up to 3 of your favourite analog pedals into the back of it. That seems like a legitimate compromise to me.
 
I am definitely interested in trying the gt-1b, and at the $200 price point and small size I don't expect perfection. Good to get some insight into what sort of issues I'll need to be prepared for. However, I don't see anything that is deserving of being called stupid or arrogant... someone had to make many decisions as to what features and controls would be there, comes down to tradeoffs that some of us can live with and others can't. On another thread someone was lamenting that there is no XLR out... at this price point I'd rather not have a DI out then to have a crappy one... YMMV
 
You've nailed the heart of the issue right there, for the most part. IMHO, there are all-in-one multi-fx pedals that could probably get you 90% of the way to replacing a traditional stomp pedal board, with good quality replications of drives, chorus, echo, reverb, flange, pitch shift, etc. They just cost a lot of money. The problem is that some of these dedicated stomp effects are really, really specific in the way they get their unique signature, and there are so many of them out there that it's impossible for the fx modelers to keep up with every possible flavor.

OTOH, if you have 4 - 5 boutique fx pedals that cost $250-300 each, you are almost already at the price point for an AX8, FX8, or Helix (LT). I'd be willing to bet that you can easily replace the value of 4 -5 boutique pedals with one of those units, and then have the bonuses you get with the upper-tier multi-fx (programmability, routing options, I/O, etc.

But down here in the weeds of low-cost modelers, it's really a roll of the dice, but IMO it has come a long, long way, and for the better.

Bou...tique? Never heard of that brand. ;) Almost all of my pedals cost me under $100 bucks - a few of them under $50, but I totally agree with your reasoning here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimfist
Agree.

And it's not just the quality of the effects in a multi-effects unit - it's the signal flow. Most multis don't let you rearrange the inputs and outputs. So you're locked into whatever standardized sequence of effects their sound designers think sounds best. Since I sometimes do non-standard positioning of individual effects within my signal chain, not being able to put something in front or after something else of my own choosing is a major deal breaker for me...

As for me, I'll stick to my basket of patch cords and my "does just one thing - but does it exceptionally well" collection of gadgets. That just seems to work best for me. No knock on multis. They're just not my own particular cuppa.

Heck, the Zoom Multistomps let you put effects in any order. You can even put multiple copies of the same effect in any of the 4, 5, or 6 slots.
 
Last edited:
He k, the Zoom Multistomps let you put effects in any order. YOu can even put multiple copies of the same effect any any of the 4, 5, or 6 slots.

Thx! :) I remembered seeing one or two that did. That must have been one of them. Which is why I said "most" wouldn't - rather than "none" would let you do that. :laugh:

Figure Zoom is one of them. If you're looking at multis, Zoom has advanced functionality nailed. They make a decent product. Very cutting edge. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Deep End
He k, the Zoom Multistomps let you put effects in any order. YOu can even put multiple copies of the same effect any any of the 4, 5, or 6 slots.

Zoom G5n will let you do up to 9 stomps total (if you don't use amp modeling and stick to effects), and the B3n/G3n will do up to 7 stomps. Granted, you have to be somewhat selective, but for those who want to load up on a fairly standard serial chain of virtual stomps, these go a long way and do a pretty good job. Good bang-for-buck. Patch switching is actually very fast, too, compared to a lot of multi-fx modelers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40Hz
Many moons ago I had a Digitech RP-6. Anyone remember them?

digitech-rp6-164932.jpg


It had several modes. You could scroll through all the presets one by one or in banks of four with the four lower ones toggling each preset.

You could set up user presets and have each bank of four as a song based selection to toggle between as needed.

You could use it like a set of preset stomp boxes with the bank pedals scrolling through user presets and having the four pedals operating distortion, modulation, delay and reverb effects.

Great bit of kit and so easy to use live. Surprised other makers never used that sort of range of interface options! Sounded good for its time too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Deep End
Many moons ago I had a Digitech RP-6. Anyone remember them?

digitech-rp6-164932.jpg


It had several modes. You could scroll through all the presets one by one or in banks of four with the four lower ones toggling each preset.

You could set up user presets and have each bank of four as a song based selection to toggle between as needed.

You could use it like a set of preset stomp boxes with the bank pedals scrolling through user presets and having the four pedals operating distortion, modulation, delay and reverb effects.

Great bit of kit and so easy to use live. Surprised other makers never used that sort of range of interface options! Sounded good for its time too!

I knew a guitarist who had one of these sitting around. I played around with it a little and it sounded alright, but this was through a nice tube amp.
 
I have always found some truths about multi effects:d

1. You have to grok the user interface, some are easier than others.
2. You have to create your own sounds and patches, factory presets are at best starting places but usually suck.
3. You will have to preload effects in an order that works for you.
4. Use them for what they do best and mix with other pedals
5. It Will Take Time And Much Tweaking Before You Reach Your Nirvana.
 
If you like / liked the sound, I say run it through a true bypass box! I'm a big fan of multi FX units and have been running different ones live for about 10 years with the help of a homemade true bypass box. It takes a little extra space but well worth it imho. I can get back to "bass straight into amp" tone almost instantly. My current setup:

bypass box with 3 loops, made from an old amp foot switch - ugly but functional

IMG_0965.JPG


IMG_0964.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassbrad
Pre-ordered this pedal from Sweetwater, and waited impatiently for delivery. In a nutshell, love the delivered sounds and potential for creating new ones, but am shocked at how unusable it is in a live setting. As far as I can tell, you have to scroll thru 100-200 patches one-at-a-time via dial or up/down pedals. Even worse, there is no stomp button for using / bypassing the pedal. You must ALWAYS have a patch selected. This wreaks of arrogance and/or stupidity on Boss's part. It's going back to Sweetwater.

It seems to me that guitar/bass pedal technology is 10 years behind that for keyboards. Using any modern DAW (I use Logic / MainStage), a keyboardist can queue up presets for 100's of instrument/effect settings and switch from one patch to the next via touch pad, foot pedal, etc. Why do guitarists/bassists have to perform a combination Riverdance-juggling routine to make the same thing happen?

Whoever comes up with a midi-controlled standard that controls our dozens of effects and amp settings will be in for a huge pay day. Is it already out there and I've just missed it?
This is my multi-fx live unit. Works like a charm. Pretty cheap used, too.

Line 6 Legacy Products
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Crab
Cool. POD XT Live?
Yep. good old Bass POD XT Live. I generally just use it for some chorus and overdrive and let my amp and cabinet do the amp and cabinet modeling. For recording, it's pretty fast and easy.

I've sort of outgrown it, but it has served me well for the better part of a decade. Gigged a lot and with no mechanical or electronic issues. Used to really have fun when I had it paired up with a Variax bass as well. I had bass models, FX and amp, cab and even mic models preset for nearly every song.
 
Boss GT-10B, for one, will receive CC messages via midi/USB giving you a wide range of ways to change patches. I'd check the manual for the 1B... good chance it is still a feature.

This opens up the possibility of midi pedal setups, automated midi instructuons run off a DAW ...or, my setlist/chart app that I have onstage with me now, will send a CC msg when you change songs, which you can of course use to change to the appropriate patch. It runs vice versa as well, which may get interesting to experiment with.
 
Wonder if the distance between footswitch's is wider on GT-1B? Regardless, it seems to have a very narrow definition of "simultaneous pressing" . This is the failing that really ticks me off, but the inability to quickly call up specific patches is a deal killer on it's own. Until I find a multi-pedal that allows you to setup a "playlist" (i.e. sequence of patches) and allows a single button (on phone or pedal) selection of next/previous patch, I'll stick with multiple pedals.

That's how the Boss GT-10B works. Pretty easy to use live IME. You can have banks of four effects available.
 
Boss GT-10B, for one, will receive CC messages via midi/USB giving you a wide range of ways to change patches. I'd check the manual for the 1B... good chance it is still a feature.

This opens up the possibility of midi pedal setups, automated midi instructuons run off a DAW ...or, my setlist/chart app that I have onstage with me now, will send a CC msg when you change songs, which you can of course use to change to the appropriate patch. It runs vice versa as well, which may get interesting to experiment with.
The 1B manual is simple and short. No mention of midi integration. The software controller is due out in Sept. Maybe a lot more will be included. To date I've read of it being for creation of patches, not live control. We'll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimfist
Pre-ordered this pedal from Sweetwater, and waited impatiently for delivery. In a nutshell, love the delivered sounds and potential for creating new ones, but am shocked at how unusable it is in a live setting. As far as I can tell, you have to scroll thru 100-200 patches one-at-a-time via dial or up/down pedals. Even worse, there is no stomp button for using / bypassing the pedal. You must ALWAYS have a patch selected. This wreaks of arrogance and/or stupidity on Boss's part. It's going back to Sweetwater.

It seems to me that guitar/bass pedal technology is 10 years behind that for keyboards. Using any modern DAW (I use Logic / MainStage), a keyboardist can queue up presets for 100's of instrument/effect settings and switch from one patch to the next via touch pad, foot pedal, etc. Why do guitarists/bassists have to perform a combination Riverdance-juggling routine to make the same thing happen?

Whoever comes up with a midi-controlled standard that controls our dozens of effects and amp settings will be in for a huge pay day. Is it already out there and I've just missed it?
If you like the sounds I would return it within the grace period and get the boss MS-3 if you want a boss multi. It's seems to be much easier to use and probably has identical algorithms as I'm pretty sure it uses the same effects engine. plus you get the bonus of being able to use dedicated pedals for some sounds because it has three loops that can be used to control dedicated pedals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Deep End