I am fortunate enough to own many basses and they are all good in one way or another, but when I pick up my "boutique" (or semi-boutique) bass, I always think "oh yeah, that's why this one is better". It's all in the details.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Not quite the context I was after. Perhaps if you stay around a while, you spot trends among users. Quite often, you'll find someone singing praise in an old thread and selling it in the next.
That settles it. Rob Allen, prepare to meet lighter fluid!
Not quite the context I was after. Perhaps if you stay around a while, you spot trends among users. Quite often, you'll find someone singing praise in an old thread and selling it in the next.
I find it odd David Gilmour bought an off the shelf Strat, didn't like some parts modified it with some other factory parts and copies of his instrument are worth like a gazzillion USD, particularly with his copied wear marks and paint overs.
Not quite the context I was after. Perhaps if you stay around a while, you spot trends among users. Quite often, you'll find someone singing praise in an old thread and selling it in the next.

This could be an ignorance on my part, but I associate Boutique basses with those with the flashy highly figured wood finish and the piano tone (like Alembic). To me that sort of flash has a very limited use in most music requiring a bass part.
I will agree that in many cases boutique basses are better. They should be better for what you pay for them. But it seems that almost every time I see a band on TV, 99 times out of 100 the bassist is playing a Fender (or a Squier!) or some other common factory bass. Why is that when boutiques are better? I would think most of these people could afford them. Perhaps this is not the case in the studio.
Depends what 'on TV means'. If you are talking about video's, many times the director is going for a look and 'concept', and that ends up being a more vintage bass often. I have a buddy who plays at quite a high level (Arena gigs), and used either a Fodera or MTD for years. On the one video that he was a part of, the director 'suggested' that he use an old PBass, for the 'look' of the video.
If you are talking about the more 'rock' end of things, Fender/Ampeg still rules, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Modern country... LOT's of Fenders, but a ton of Sadowsky, USA Laklands and Music Man basses.
Jazz/fusion..... Fodera, Roscoe... you name it... fancy pants city.
Gospel.... often MTD's and Ken Smiths... and various Fender or boutique J's.
A lot of the above is a sort of 'lemmings into the sea' sort of thing (i.e., I know quite a few guys who have bought Fodera's because Tommy Kennedy, Anthony Jackson, etc. plays them... etc.).
IF you find a more limited production, high quality, handmade (or small batch made) bass that speaks to you tonewise, it is VERY hard to go back playing something off the rack from Guitar Center or whatever. Worth every penny to me x 10!
Different strokes for different folks![]()
James Jamming on a FENDER! Jaco Jammed on a FENDER! The best bass players of all time! NOBOUTIQUE Basses!

WRONG!! SXs ARE THE BEST BASSES EVARRR!! JESUS MAKES THEM WITH HIS OWN HANDS
I keep thinking that a boutique leather jacket may be way more expensive than a Schott, finer material, better fit, etc., but if your bike goes down, you want the Schott everytime. I can't disagree about anything you've said about boutique basses, except they do not seem to be the tools that most professional bassists use. Why not? (I'm honestly asking why not, because I'd like to know)