TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
First, the wiring was modified because the black-white pair should have been twisted together but while the white wire shows the original twisting, the black wire does not.
The very first thing to do is verify that the cabinet is correctly wired. (Most of the cabinets were 8 ohms, using a series-parallel combination of 8 ohm drivers)
Is there a nominal impedance stated on the driver?
Are they all the same driver... for the 8 ohm cabinet, they SHOULD all be 8 ohms but the one with the missing dustcap may be 4 ohms which may (depending on how wired) have received more power and because those drivers were not designed around extended bass, damaged the dust cap.
Those look like an early driver we used, possibly earliest of what became the Eminence Legend series. Does it have a #761058 stamped on the back of the magnet? I kind of doubt it because the surround doesn't match my data.
I would say no more than 150 watts each as a generality for driver of that era.
First, the wiring was modified because the black-white pair should have been twisted together but while the white wire shows the original twisting, the black wire does not.
The very first thing to do is verify that the cabinet is correctly wired. (Most of the cabinets were 8 ohms, using a series-parallel combination of 8 ohm drivers)
Is there a nominal impedance stated on the driver?
Are they all the same driver... for the 8 ohm cabinet, they SHOULD all be 8 ohms but the one with the missing dustcap may be 4 ohms which may (depending on how wired) have received more power and because those drivers were not designed around extended bass, damaged the dust cap.
Those look like an early driver we used, possibly earliest of what became the Eminence Legend series. Does it have a #761058 stamped on the back of the magnet? I kind of doubt it because the surround doesn't match my data.
I would say no more than 150 watts each as a generality for driver of that era.
First, the wiring was modified because the black-white pair should have been twisted together but while the white wire shows the original twisting, the black wire does not.
The very first thing to do is verify that the cabinet is correctly wired. (Most of the cabinets were 8 ohms, using a series-parallel combination of 8 ohm drivers)
Is there a nominal impedance stated on the driver?
Are they all the same driver... for the 8 ohm cabinet, they SHOULD all be 8 ohms but the one with the missing dustcap may be 4 ohms which may (depending on how wired) have received more power and because those drivers were not designed around extended bass, damaged the dust cap.
Those look like an early driver we used, possibly earliest of what became the Eminence Legend series. Does it have a #761058 stamped on the back of the magnet? I kind of doubt it because the surround doesn't match my data.
I would say no more than 150 watts each as a generality for driver of that era.
I can't read the numbers on the tag, that looks like a version of an early Eminence cast frame driver that ultimately became the Legend series metalwork. The numbers on the tag may include 761___ the first 2 digits should be 76. The cone numbers don't mean anything (for this purpose anyway).
That's an unvented motor used with a comp. paper dust cap. If they were driven beyond their mechanical rating, the dust cap could break the bond to the cone. This changed in later drivers.
I don't recall using a P-Audio HF driver, but it's quite possible that it was changed out at some time, or maybe it was a very early build prior to our later HF drivers.
"Parallel" is misspelled? Interesting...View attachment 7481402
Nothing on the speakers other than Made in USA. Was thinking the speaker have been swapped out at some point?
"Parallel" is misspelled? Interesting...
BBB
Not implying it's not genuine, just noticed it's a word I don't recognize, probably because it'd not a word...View attachment 7481488
Seems consistent with other amps for sale. Although some say Paralleled also! Strange
Possibly, hard to be sure though because there may have been additional customization of the soft parts.
That’s our part number, back then things weren’t always consistent, not just with us, but with many of the industry’s vendors too.View attachment 7481505
This one from 2019 does have a sramp starting 761...
When you've wired up speakers, you've either serialed them or paralleled them. QEDView attachment 7481488
Seems consistent with other amps for sale. Although some say Paralleled also! Strange

Paralleled came from the guitar side anyway (just like "omage"When you've wired up speakers, you've either serialed them or paralleled them. QED![]()