This is absolutely one area (wireless gear) where skimping on cost is just throwing good money after bad. It's tough enough to get this stuff to all work together when using the quality stuff, let alone go cheap. It's not just you out in the wireless wild west, but everyone else and the horses they rode in on.…which would make it all that more important to spend the money on a quality wireless system (whatever form that may take).
The issues with active basses and certain transmitters indicates issues with that transmitter, not the bass. I would avoid that brand of wireless regardless of active or passive basses. If they scrimped on that part of the transmitter, what else did they scrimp on?
This is a harsh rule, and not my rule, but one I try to live by. If I can’t afford a quality piece, I either don’t buy it or I save my money to get it. I do not settle for a lesser quality piece.
If you can't afford a quality system from a manufacturer who will help steer you through the wireless minefields, that are today's wireless environment, then save your money and just cable up. Sennheiser and Shure are two such companies.
In my opinion, there is no such thing as plug and play when it comes to wireless. The best place to be currently is in the UHF bands, and even then, you need to avoid TV station frequencies, which change depending on your location. Frequency agile systems are a must. Diversity systems also help in that they run some redundancy that can get around certain problems. It just ain't gonna be cheap, and it is high maintenance. This I know from having managed about 30 of these systems for various types of wireless uses.
IMO, People getting by on cheap systems have only done so due to luck.
Last edited:

