• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Can't wrap my head around active vs. passive basses

One thing that blew my mind is preamps. I had a fender Jazz circa 1990 and when I started playing again a few years ago made a pedalboard with a microtubes Infiniti.

I then went to a Spector 5 active and now a Kiesel ZB6 that’s active. Both of those just sounded muddy as all get out. On my board. I could never get a good tone no matter how much I adjusted the compressor, filters, and EQ on the microtubes. This went on for a year or so with me adding a separate compressor and distortion.

Then one day I bypassed the microtubes and it sounded a million times better.

To my point… I wonder how many people like me got preamps or EQs that never needed them. I’m still flabbergasted that the microtubes gets so much love but I could never get the strings to have even volume no matter how much tweaking I did. The B-E would boom loudly while the rest were fairly dead. High pass set, eq adjusted. Nothing helped. Bypass. Great. So does an active kinda negate the need for a preamp? Probably. I just use my microtubes as a very expensive DI box.
 

Latest posts