TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
a $1900 peavey?
wow...
Don't spend $1900 on a Peavey. That's not even a slam on the brand but Jeez, I bought a brand new Mike Lull for $2200. (Granted that was several years ago)
Carvin gets my vote for the best instruments for the money. Best materials, best craftsmanship, best price, best buy in their price range.
Don't spend $1900 on a Peavey. That's not even a slam on the brand but Jeez, I bought a brand new Mike Lull for $2200. (Granted that was several years ago)
Carvin gets my vote for the best instruments for the money. Best materials, best craftsmanship, best price, best buy in their price range.
not trying to start an argument, but if you spec a carvin with the same specs as the cirrus, the wood, scale, electronics, blah, blah, blah, they are pretty close in price. i think the carvin would still be a bit cheaper. don't buy a bass because of brand or, i might save a few bucks. buy it because you like it. $1900 for a peavey is fine with me if i like the way it sounds and plays. especially if i like it better than the $2500 bass. which for me, that was the case. granted i think mike lull basses prices are still down to earth. some of those builders went way out of my range a long time ago.
When do you think Peavey will start do cirrus 6 strings again?
Do you know if they will change the system active only to active/passive?
Thank's
...Peavey is an active system only and i had a bass active only and i had a problem with battery on stage and it was really embarrassing.
So maybe i will go with Carvin because they are on market from 60s, and their basses are active/passive push-pull that i prefer since i had trouble with active system only,
...and i can build the bass the way i want on their site.
After a lot of reading, A lot of people say Peavey bass is better, But Carvin is a better company.
Probably ( not sure yet ) i will go with Carvin, because of the Active/Passive system.
When do you think Peavey will start do cirrus 6 strings again?
Do you know if they will change the system active only to active/passive?
Don't spend $1900 on a Peavey. That's not even a slam on the brand but Jeez, I bought a brand new Mike Lull for $2200. (Granted that was several years ago)
Thank's guys for all comments.
Peavey cirrus is a great Bass, but i will go with Carvin bass.
They have a custom shop, and they keep a lot of basses for many years without change, and it will be easy to do a repair in 15 years or more if i need. And the custom shop is very nice make a bass the way you like, with color, pick ups, wood, etc.
For the price and quality, i think it worth.
Custom shop bass 6 string around $ 1,400.00
It is a good deal.
Appreciate all comments and answers .
When i got the bass i will put some pictures here.
Thank's
Don't spend $1900 on a Peavey. That's not even a slam on the brand but Jeez, I bought a brand new Mike Lull for $2200. (Granted that was several years ago)
Carvin gets my vote for the best instruments for the money. Best materials, best craftsmanship, best price, best buy in their price range.