TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
e: I will say that I hate how the pickups look on the Carvin. On a P-styled-bass I gotta see those pole pieces.
Interesting thread, it would be even moreso if any of the voters had actually played both.
The P5s and VMP5s do not have muddy Bs but I agree earlier Fenders I have played or heard did. Fender got it right on these, even the $299 Squiers.
People continually parrot what they have read in the past about Carvin resale value. Used Carvins go for pretty good money these days.
I have only owned one Carvin, an LB75. It was one of the worst basses I have ever owned.
I have only owned one Carvin, an LB75. It was one of the worst basses I have ever owned. No punch, no clarity, just terrible sounding. I love my Fenders, Alembics and Spectors.
I voted to go with the Fender. I'm with the others that say the Carvin really takes a hit as far as resale goes. Also, I've never really thought the Carvins offered anything special. I know you can get them custom built to your specs, but even then, I've never played one that thrilled me.
The more "bling" you put on a Carvin, the lower the percentage you'll recoup in a resale. Someone has a BB75 in the classifieds for sale that he originally maxed out on options at $2800. That will probably end up being a huge hit when it sells.
Don't write off all Carvins with a sample size of one.![]()
Sure, the more you customize, especially with expensive options, the less you will likely get back in resale. The same is true of a fender that has been highly modified or customized.
If you are talking about the bass in the classifieds that I think you are, it is no longer for sale because Carvin is completely rebuilding the bass for him, for free, after he was dissatisfied with the highly customized paint job on the first.