• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Carvin SB5000 / SB4000 Roll Call!

Status
Not open for further replies.
it sounds like it would be redundant, but it really is pretty cool having both. on the ibanez im selling, ive got the bart ntbt wired up with a passive tone and rolling off the tone makes it burpier and fartier,the treble cut just makes it more muffled.

I smell what you're stepping in...I have felt the same way at times. Since I got on the alder/ebony thing, I haven't felt like I needed a passive tone knob since the combination is dark enough by itself. When I had alder/maple basses I really did use it quite a bit.

I find the alder/ebony SB5000 to not need the passive roll off much if at all, while the stacked midrange EQ does ALOT of stuff. I find it to sound better than the same circuit on the East preamps (though not having had the Carvin out on a gig yet).

W
 
Hows the string spacing on the sb5000? I like a tight spacing like an MM SR5. Been looking very close at these considering its the only affordable 5 string jazz for a lefty.

It isn't "tight". I think it's 19mm. It feels pretty much like the Fender Am Delux spacing. This good bass for thumping so I think the wider spacing is appropriate, but I like tight spacing too for playing fast.
 
I smell what you're stepping in...I have felt the same way at times. Since I got on the alder/ebony thing, I haven't felt like I needed a passive tone knob since the combination is dark enough by itself. When I had alder/maple basses I really did use it quite a bit.

I find the alder/ebony SB5000 to not need the passive roll off much if at all, while the stacked midrange EQ does ALOT of stuff. I find it to sound better than the same circuit on the East preamps (though not having had the Carvin out on a gig yet).

W

Nice....that baby is ready for the Jersey circuit for sure.....:D
 
Hows the string spacing on the sb5000? I like a tight spacing like an MM SR5. Been looking very close at these considering its the only affordable 5 string jazz for a lefty.

swap out the bridge for a 17.5mm one. the nut is the same as a ray5 and with the 17.5mm bridge youll have the same spacing. there will be a little room on either side of the b and e strings but its easy to pull the g off the edge of the neck on a ray5 anyway.
 
I smell what you're stepping in...I have felt the same way at times. Since I got on the alder/ebony thing, I haven't felt like I needed a passive tone knob since the combination is dark enough by itself. When I had alder/maple basses I really did use it quite a bit.

I find the alder/ebony SB5000 to not need the passive roll off much if at all, while the stacked midrange EQ does ALOT of stuff. I find it to sound better than the same circuit on the East preamps (though not having had the Carvin out on a gig yet).

W

so its emg'ish and dark at the same time? my head just exploded:D
 
so its emg'ish and dark at the same time? my head just exploded:D

I don't really think of EMG stuff as bright in a way that I want to roll off...it's kind of more of a slightly compressed thing with a present high end, but it isn't bright. I don't think the EMG thing is really accurate for this bass anyway. :confused: Look, I'm tired, I have a day job. :bassist: :(
 
Andy- I think part of it is the ebony board but more the pickups and pre. One thing I can tell you is that I'm VERY glad I got the sweepable mids on the pre. (It was a $15 upgrade :bassist:). It is a stacked knob. I thought the treble cut and passive tone on the standard pre would be redundant.

Does the mid sweep upgrade eliminate the passive/active feature?



A Groove is a Terrible Thing to Waste! :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.