How many of you pay this?
I have no problem supporting my kids and always pay on time or early.
My problem is ... It appears to be written by people that have a guaranteed life long salary job with zero chance of layoff , pay reduction or a cut in hours worked.
When you are married and you miss work , or lose a job your income goes down for the entire family.
They don't come and jail you because you can't provide the same level of lifestyle..
don't pay your support for any reason and they eventually will.
Child support should be a percentage based program . It would be closer to the reality married couples deal with .
EG , I pay 10% of my gross to the ex, I make $1000.00 a week , that equals $100.00 paid . The next week I work overtime and make $2000.00 , she gets $200.00 paid. the following week I get rained out a few days and only make $500.00 , she gets $50.00.
I fail to see the difference between married couples and the above program I suggest.
If you try to argue this with lawmakers and divorce counselors the first thing they say is " but it's for the children" and " so the children don't have to suffer a reduction in lifestyle as it is stressful". That is designed to shut you down and derail your argument. I call BS. You take two peoples salaries that don't change , now divide it between two households , every body suffers a financial loss. I think the biggest reason it stays the way it is ... they want me to provide as much as possible even if I have to live in a box so they don't have to worry about providing public assistance for the ex and my kids.
My pay fluctuates as much as +- 40% but it generally does equal out . I did have a few years , '07 &'08 , that I made $10,000 less than previous years . During that time we did less and sacrificed.
I sound bitter . I am not . I just do it and have adjusted to it. I think it's time for a realistic overhaul.
I have no problem supporting my kids and always pay on time or early.
My problem is ... It appears to be written by people that have a guaranteed life long salary job with zero chance of layoff , pay reduction or a cut in hours worked.
When you are married and you miss work , or lose a job your income goes down for the entire family.
They don't come and jail you because you can't provide the same level of lifestyle..
don't pay your support for any reason and they eventually will.
Child support should be a percentage based program . It would be closer to the reality married couples deal with .
EG , I pay 10% of my gross to the ex, I make $1000.00 a week , that equals $100.00 paid . The next week I work overtime and make $2000.00 , she gets $200.00 paid. the following week I get rained out a few days and only make $500.00 , she gets $50.00.
I fail to see the difference between married couples and the above program I suggest.
If you try to argue this with lawmakers and divorce counselors the first thing they say is " but it's for the children" and " so the children don't have to suffer a reduction in lifestyle as it is stressful". That is designed to shut you down and derail your argument. I call BS. You take two peoples salaries that don't change , now divide it between two households , every body suffers a financial loss. I think the biggest reason it stays the way it is ... they want me to provide as much as possible even if I have to live in a box so they don't have to worry about providing public assistance for the ex and my kids.
My pay fluctuates as much as +- 40% but it generally does equal out . I did have a few years , '07 &'08 , that I made $10,000 less than previous years . During that time we did less and sacrificed.
I sound bitter . I am not . I just do it and have adjusted to it. I think it's time for a realistic overhaul.
), but I'm not holding my breath.
