I take it that is with new strings, right?
Maybe, it'd be cool if there was a comparison video using, say, 5-6 year old sets to see how they change over time.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Chromes - do the highs stay or go?
- Thread starter basss
- Start date
Maybe, it'd be cool if there was a comparison video using, say, 5-6 year old sets to see how they change over time.
For some reason when I play Chromes on a P bass, the sound, it reminds me of Bruce Thomas.
I like that
They probably are newer strings but in my opinion the Chromes lacked in all categories. Lows, mids and highs. I had Chromes on a fretless and replaced them with Monel flats and have been on for a few years and have held up better than the Chromes did
For some reason when I play Chromes on a P bass, the sound, it reminds me of Bruce Thomas.
I like that
I've had them on Js, PJs, and my Grabber and they do their thing nicely on them all. I love their growl when played with a pick, although, as someone mentioned earlier, that depends just as much on the signal chain.
They are plenty bright for me when broken in for fusion played up the neck. They have a mellowness in the upper register that sounds good for a very long time.
I'm putting them on my Aerodyne this weekend sometime. They're replacing some Fender flats. I just don't like them as much broken in as I do the Chromes. I just wrapped some Labellas around the posts of my new #1 last night, replacing the Chromes.
So for my tastes, Labellas>Chromes>>Fender flats. But I could play Chromes for the rest of my days and be perfectly happy.
I'm also in the Chrome's camp closely followed by Fender 9050s. I really like zingy new flats and tend to change them pretty frequently so I honestly can't attest to really old ones. I sure do like new ones though and I'm good with their feel both texture and tension-wise.
Just get EB Cobalt flats and be done with the search. I am saying this as a former user of the Chromes.
The guy in the video is Mateusz Piotrowski. He makes sweet vintage-type instruments here in Poland, check out his website Link Removed
I have a short scale P with Chromes and a long scale P with Fender 9050. Both sets have the same playing time in them. I find the Fenders have a honky midrange and not much high end, whereas the Chromes are scooped in the mids and have a nice top end. Very different tones. Is it the strings or the scale lengths?
I grew up in a time where we were all trying to get away from that flat wound sound. Our heroes were Chris Squire, Stanley Clarke, Jaco, etc. It's difficult to "un-hear" the sounds you tried to stay away from as a kid. I am certainly accepting of all bass tones and strings, but flats just aren't my cup of tea. I've always liked that kind of "springy' sound from rounds.
I use Chromes on a lot of basses. I have three sporting them right now
I think they hold up pretty well for a long time, but will eventually go, what I call dead, can be a year or two depending on how much an instrument is getting played. Then I change them. Really depends a lot on the bass, the EQ and the tone you use. For recording I can get that Chuck Rainy tone out of them almost no matter the age. For Live the need to have a bit more clank left in them.
I have a similar experience with TI flats which I have on 3 basses.
I think they hold up pretty well for a long time, but will eventually go, what I call dead, can be a year or two depending on how much an instrument is getting played. Then I change them. Really depends a lot on the bass, the EQ and the tone you use. For recording I can get that Chuck Rainy tone out of them almost no matter the age. For Live the need to have a bit more clank left in them.
I have a similar experience with TI flats which I have on 3 basses.
Can't stand Chromes for that very reason, they have a massive mid scoop and the mids that do have seem to be in that annoying muddy mid bass area
Just put a set of 105-50 on my P.
Great strings - love the tension and tone!
Great strings - love the tension and tone!
I would think in your case that it's more the strings. Now if they were reversed on the scale length I would guess the opposite. Keep in mind I don't have a degree in rocket appliances.
Suggestion, use the tone control to roll off some high end on your Chromes. It works for me.
That actually sounds like what I'm looking for. Thumpy low mids, clear highs, mid mids rolled back to tame the bark.
I dig that because that was my time zone
Yet as I grew in my music appreciation I found myself exploring the bass sounds I didn't appreciate at the time.
Over the years I've, like many, have gathered more than one bass. So now I can experiment with different sounds and strings. I have played Chromes on a spare P bass. Now I'm running La Bella 1954s, the James Jamerson, Duck Dunn strings 52-110
Doing the whole bridge cover sponge rubber mute thing.It's glorious
I actually like the Chromes better, I think. The Fenders are too nasal. Especially the A and D strings around the 10-13 frets, though maybe that's also my Rumble 100's fault.
I'd love to try the 1954s but I'm afraid I'll run out of truss rod. Massive tension. My P has a modern C neck which is quite thin. What say you?I dig that because that was my time zone
Yet as I grew in my music appreciation I found myself exploring the bass sounds I didn't appreciate at the time.
Over the years I've, like many, have gathered more than one bass. So now I can experiment with different sounds and strings. I have played Chromes on a spare P bass. Now I'm running La Bella 1954s, the James Jamerson, Duck Dunn strings 52-110
It's glorious
