Highly unlikely that your instruments have turtle shell and ivory in/on them.
yes I think your right, would like to know an easy way for a non expert to check?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Highly unlikely that your instruments have turtle shell and ivory in/on them.
There certainly is a worry if it has a rosewood fingerboard.Another reason why you're off the shelf, Standard P Bass is superior. No CITES worries with those!
There certainly is a worry if it has a rosewood fingerboard.
Um yeah, what's that fingerboard on your PB in your avatar?Another reason why you're off the shelf, Standard P Bass is superior. No CITES worries with those!

Um y eah, what's that fingerboard on your PB in your avatar?![]()
Maple fingerboard, these days, to comply with the World Order Of CITES (WOOC)?That's not mine anymore. Traded it a while ago.
NWO. New wood order.Maple fingerboard, these days, to comply with the World Order Of CITES (WOOC)?![]()
See, this is the thing I'm wondering - how much do I have to worry if a bass I am taking across the boarder is made from dark, non-CITES wood (e.g., wenge) - or even graphite, for that matter - and I have documentation from the manufacturer stating what kinds of wood/material the bass is made from? I can see a boarder agent with no knowledge of wood still confiscating the bass if I don't have a "passport" for it.I think my next bass will be a Status Stealth.
I can see a border agent with no knowledge of wood still confiscating the bass if I don't have a "passport" for it.
A note from the manufacturer won't hold any weight with a customs officer. It's not an official document as far as he is concerned. You use the manufacturers documentation to obtain the passport that is recognized by customs - though maybe only by Customs in the country where you got the passport. The situation is improving internationally, but not all countries recognize CITES passports from other countries.See, this is the thing I'm wondering - how much do I have to worry if a bass I am taking across the boarder is made from dark, non-CITES wood (e.g., wenge) - or even graphite, for that matter - and I have documentation from the manufacturer stating what kinds of wood/material the bass is made from? I can see a boarder agent with no knowledge of wood still confiscating the bass if I don't have a "passport" for it.
EIR and BRW look quite different from each other, to me....most bass players couldn't tell the difference between Brazilian and Indian Rosewood.
...and to me, too... but not to most. For sure. Just because we are geeks doesn't mean everybody else isEIR and BRW look quite different from each other, to me.
Exactly! As a consumer, I would love to have documentation for every bass I own showing I comply with the law, but the process of getting it is far from user friendly.That's the thing. This is an international issues, so said document should be a single specific instrument that is universally recognized and accepted for all countries. Just like a real passport for people is. Otherwise, it would just reinforce the concept of this CITES thing being another money grab from each member country if different sets of documentation were required for each country, with the attendant fees required to be paid to each country for the documentation we'd need.
So far my experience with CITES....
I ordered a GPS Warwick Thumb BO 5 string from a local distributor back in February. I was told it'd be a couple months when they're available which was no problem considering I was waiting on other stuff I preordered after NAMM. Fast forward to today and I'm still waiting. The bass has been at some port for a while being held by Fish and Wildlife. They need permits from Germany and is a mess. I'm not holding my breath but hopefully by the end of August.
Buy domestic my friends