• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

CITES - What every bass player should know

Hi, I'm a bass player from Chile (South America) and will be traveling to the US in August. I'm planning to purchase a used bass there. if I carry the bass with me in the airplane (meaning, no shipping couriers overseas), can i still face trouble at customs if the bass has a rosewood fretboard?
 
Hi, I'm a bass player from Chile (South America) and will be traveling to the US in August. I'm planning to purchase a used bass there. if I carry the bass with me in the airplane (meaning, no shipping couriers overseas), can i still face trouble at customs if the bass has a rosewood fretboard?

Based on my understanding - you might be in trouble if they do check: what you've done is bought a bass in the US, then are exporting it to your home-country.

I don't think it's relevant that you carry the bass with you on the plane, rather than shipping it; in either case: you've bought a bass in the US, and intend to transport it out of the US. This constitutes "international trade", and from what I understand, CITES would apply.

Happy to be corrected by anyone, if i've got it wrong.
 
@Turnaround.
If I were to buy a Bass with rosewood from a private seller located in the USA, have the Bass shipped at a nearby location at the USA borders, go there to pick up the beauty, cross the borders and back to Canada, all in one day, do I need a CITES permit?

With the exception of Brazilian Rosewood, the new CITES regulations do not apply to personal instruments. They only apply to commercial transactions. Since you purchased the bass in the US, it would now be your personal instrument and you should not have to worry about CITES when you go back to Canada (unless you get a wacko customs person!).
 
With the exception of Brazilian Rosewood, the new CITES regulations do not apply to personal instruments. They only apply to commercial transactions. Since you purchased the bass in the US, it would now be your personal instrument and you should not have to worry about CITES when you go back to Canada (unless you get a wacko customs person!).
I think if a Canadian goes to the U.S. and buys a new bass, it's still technically considered importing when he crosses the border back into Canada.

Your other observation (about a wacko customs person) has been at the center of my gripe all along with CITES. Instruments made with CITES-regulated materials are supposed to have a passport, for which there is a cumbersome process. Ideally, the passport process would be very user friendly, making compliance easy and therefore universal. And there should be instrument passports available for every instrument, regardless of whether an instrument contains CITES materials or not -- because the nature of CITES is to grow the number of included materials, so instruments that have no such materials now may very well have them in the future, without any changes ever having been made to the instrument.
 
With the exception of Brazilian Rosewood, the new CITES regulations do not apply to personal instruments. They only apply to commercial transactions. Since you purchased the bass in the US, it would now be your personal instrument and you should not have to worry about CITES when you go back to Canada (unless you get a wacko customs person!).
Good luck finding a customs agent who can tell when a piece of rosewood isn't Brazilian. :D Assuming that the burden of proof is on the bass owner (which I'm pretty sure it would be), the problem is that we are at the mercy of people who are generally clueless about wood but have absolute authority where border crossing is concerned. :eek:
 
I think if a Canadian goes to the U.S. and buys a new bass, it's still technically considered importing when he crosses the border back into Canada.

Not according to the CITES inspector I spoke with back when I was exporting my bass to The Netherlands. But in all honesty, it seems like all this stuff leaves us at the mercy of whoever decides to stick their nose in.
 
With the exception of Brazilian Rosewood, the new CITES regulations do not apply to personal instruments. They only apply to commercial transactions. Since you purchased the bass in the US, it would now be your personal instrument and you should not have to worry about CITES when you go back to Canada (unless you get a wacko customs person!).
Wish that were true. But all the customs people I have spoken to would call that international trade and the CITES regulations would apply. I suppose you could make an argument about it, but that would probably only get settled in a court of law, and I for one wouldn't want to go there.
 
Warmoth is one of the few aftermarket suppliers that have taken the time to set up the proper CITES paperwork process for Indian rosewood exports. They now offer all the Stateside certification, in order to ease the shipment of replacement necks to other countries. This is good news, as Canada doesn't require an import permit on small purchases if the US paperwork is all in order.

However, when I checked with Warmoth in June, they couldn't offer any guarantees as to what would happen to my order on entry to Canada.

According to the rep I spoke to, they are moving a fair amount of product to Canada again, but the entry process still seems to be dependent on the luck of the draw. He wouldn't give me numbers, but indicated that while most transactions go OK, there have been a few confiscations on the Canadian side.

I decided to order a roasted maple 2-piece neck instead. Since that meant no CITES paperwork, I was also able to save close to $100 Canadian by purchasing from Best Guitar Parts, also out of Washington. I liked their pricing, turnaround time and customization options, and am very happy with my new neck.

However, the knowledge that there are still potential issues with Customs, puts a real damper on my ability to trade used instruments with other enthusiasts across the border. I don't do this very often, and if l lost just one instrument to CITES, it would take me dozens of successful transactions to recover.

Not to mention the possible friction it would cause if I got my axe, but the guy I was trading with didn't...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garret Graves
Wish that were true. But all the customs people I have spoken to would call that international trade and the CITES regulations would apply. I suppose you could make an argument about it, but that would probably only get settled in a court of law, and I for one wouldn't want to go there.

FWIW, the USDF&W guy I talked to was only commenting on the US side of the equation, and he mentioned that it would still be imperative to to get clarification on a per-country basis before attempting to bring in an instrument to the new owner's home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajkula66
FWIW, the USDF&W guy I talked to was only commenting on the US side of the equation, and he mentioned that it would still be imperative to to get clarification on a per-country basis before attempting to bring in an instrument to the new owner's home.
That's part of the equation that often gets overlooked. A shipment I am aware of had the proper papers coming from the USA, but it was held up by Canadian customs officials at the port of entry in Canada. You have to chase both sides of the equation.
 
Thanks again y'all. I've enjoyed following this thread a great deal — 'Enjoyed'? Perhaps not the best descriptor — might read more like 'been frightened by' or 'been having nightmares about' :) I've also enjoyed the notion that my needs were met, in this regard, before the rosewood hit the ban. However, I do feel for those who struggle with the limitations, trying to keep the game alive. Professional people are doing a fine job, in trying times.

I've had an ear to the ground since I started playing in earnest. Remember the resentment towards those who went on binge global shopping sprees, hunting the world over for premium product and ravenously buying it all up? There was a lot of grumbling. One of my guitars came from a luthier's desperate need to fund one such trip. You won't catch me grumbling.

This site, one that serves admirably many of the readers of this thread, offers some sage advice, supporting many of the arguments made here. Having one or two prominent friends in the show, this fact doesn't elude me: "Guitar makers, dealers and collectors have long faced a crazy quilt of regulations worldwide regarding endangered woods. …"

The premium paid, especially by makers and dealers, is hard to fathom, without insight. One thing's easy to understand. One shouldn't pay with a jail term. This may be on the cards these days, for the hapless and unaware. But saving the natural ecosystems that can produce these miraculous woods is the real issue here. These forests are the irreplaceable life-supports that help to keep the entire globe healthy, wealthy and wise.

It goes way beyond industries surrounding music and carpentry. But adherence now should keep us all productive and alive, ongoingly, in a very real sense. So, hats off to all who find a better, more sustainable way. (I wood if I could but I cant :whistle:)

Here's the skinny anyway, with thanks to the author, from Flying with guitars – help for traveling musicians – airlines & guitars: Transport of guitars complicated by new rosewood pact
The new 2017 international regulations don’t apply to non-commercial transportation of guitars and similar instruments …. This means, at least in theory, that guitarists shouldn’t have problems when carrying their own instruments.

The Convention of International Trade of Endangered Species of Flora and Fauna (CITES) agreement that went into effect Jan. 2, 2017, exempts those traveling with instruments for personal use with up to 22 pounds of regulated woods (per shipment). “Gifts” also are exempted, the U.S. Department of the Interior says. The new regulations also do not apply to instruments transported within a country.

A CITES convention in fall 2016 extended existing protections to all species of rosewood under the genus Dalbergia, three bubinga species (Guibourtia demeusei, Guibourtia pellegriniana and Guibourtia tessmannii), and kosso or African rosewood.
 
Last edited: