• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Classic, jurassic and tragic headstock design

Classic:

125_2560.jpg


100_2450_956.jpg


Also +1 to the Super J
 
I'm a "form follows function" guy. For that reason, I will always prefer an angled headstock to a straight one. Aesthetics do play a secondary role, however, which is why I much prefer the Tobias headstock over the Warwick.

Criteria for a good headstock:
- Angled design (none of that string tree nonsense)
- Straight (or nearly straight) string pull through the nut
- Symmetry near the nut (for aesthetics as well as hanging straight on the wall)
- Compact (saves weight)
- No obvious vulnerabilities (pointy bits)
- No all-inline tuners (purely an aesthetic choice)
- Compact and lightweight tuners

For this reason, the Tobias headstock is a thing of beauty.
Headstock.jpg


The Warmoth house-style headstock is nice too, though the 4-string is not symmetrical near the nut.
angled_3.jpg

deluxe5_4.jpg


The classic Gibson EB-0/Les Paul design, while pleasingly symmetrical, fails the "straight string pull" criterion in a big way, a shortcoming it shares with many high-end manufacturers.

The classic Fender designs, whether Jazz/Pre or Tele, fail on almost every count. The original Tele design is one of the ugliest things I've ever seen this side of a Wishbass.
 
I'm glad someone mentioned the Tobias headstock. Mike just plain got it right with that.
Funny thing, he did (and does) that a lot with his basses - got it right. :D