Yes, Baden Powell's father named him after the founder of the Boy Scouts.
Green Bar Bill would have been far worse.
Anyway, after my friend played the contra guitar, he realized that he had been thinking of the instrument as a large classical guitar instead of as a bass. So, a lot of the notes he wrote sound better when moved up an octave and are not played on open strings. The open strings can be played to great effect, but not when overused.
I'd be tempted to tune the second and first strings to C and F, respectively.
During rehearsal, we found that if I drove the guitar hard with the side of my thumbnail, closer to the bridge, that I could really push out a lot of sound. and that it was more focused. So, to answer your question, I don't think I need a lighter touch on the contra guitar, I think I need a heavier touch to make it come alive. I think this makes sense because I have to move a much longer string than on a regular sized classical guitar and that takes energy.
True, one would have to put more energy into the contra string due to the increased stiffness of the string at the fixed point of the bridge (less string elasticity) and the larger plate under contra's bridge...particularly with the increased mass of the low E-string. Then again, I don't know how many pounds of linear tension are present in the contra strings.
And, oh, I heard from the luthier, and this guitar became available when the guy who ordered it could not pay for it, as I guessed, so the same old story.
It certainly seems to have found a good home.


