New thread so here's my three sons...
Man, I continue to like those! The LM and RA really speak to me, and that LG is something also. Cool

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
New thread so here's my three sons...

I just thought of something in regards to the current discussion (maybe even historically) of LG vs. LM...
My question: Is the RA only considered as the "3rd option" or a "nice to have"???
When got into A-C's I read all the previous threads and it seems like this the general thought process for current owners and guys looking to get one. I fall into this category also because my RA5 "just came about" due to opportunity and availability. But this thing is proving it's worth and the whole selling it when the LM gets here thought is slowly discipating.
LG5 at rehearsal the other day; this was right before I sprayed everything down with lighter fluid.
![]()
Man, I can definitely see this. I know the RA is kind of a "3rd half" design, but I played some LG's, LM's and RA's at NAMM and especially noting I could probably get an RA closer to 9 pounds than an LM, I'd be VERY seriously considering one if the time came to get a second AC for me. I REALLY liked it a LOT.If I were still playing 5 strings, then I would say that the RA5 would be "the one" to have. Most guys that have properly set up an RA5 and used it in a number of situations (and there are VERY few) would tell you that it is the most versatile of the 3 models, capable of covering all of the ground between the LG and LM, and coming pretty damn close to both of them at either extreme. All in all a great bass that I would think very deeply about before parting with it.
Hey Yohann,
If I were still playing 5 strings, then I would say that the RA5 would be "the one" to have. Most guys that have properly set up an RA5 and used it in a number of situations (and there are VERY few) would tell you that it is the most versatile of the 3 models, capable of covering all of the ground between the LG and LM, and coming pretty damn close to both of them at either extreme. All in all a great bass that I would think very deeply about before parting with it.
Here's my RA5:
![]()
And the mock-up of my upcoming LM5, courtesy of thndrstk6:
![]()
Hey Yohann,
If I were still playing 5 strings, then I would say that the RA5 would be "the one" to have. Most guys that have properly set up an RA5 and used it in a number of situations (and there are VERY few) would tell you that it is the most versatile of the 3 models, capable of covering all of the ground between the LG and LM, and coming pretty damn close to both of them at either extreme. All in all a great bass that I would think very deeply about before parting with it.
Hey Yohann, I never thought about it until I saw these 2 pics back to back, but when you get your LM5 you'll basically end up with the opposite of what we were talking about in the 60's vs 70's debate - you'll have an alder/maple RA5 and an ash/rosewood LM5. What were Jimmy's thoughts on what a rosewood LM5 will sound like?
Yeah, well Lakland owners have a lot more to complain about!Part 10 finished about 37 posts shy of the full 1000. The Lakland Group threads usually go past 1000 posts in 10-12 days....

We've missed you too! Hope all is well with you on the road -- and with the family back home.I'm in !!
Hey ... if you guys know anybody looking for an LG4, i just posted mine in the classifieds.
I could really use a second LG5 on tour, so i'm trying to flip it for that.
Hope everyone's doing well ... i've been crazy busy & have been taking a break from TB.
Yeah, these clips should DEFINITELY club qualify you!I'll get in by just posting up the two clips I did yesterday at the end of the last thread, so they get into this one:
LG
Alright, I was going to wait until I had better photos, but that may take a while and im too excited.
I picked up the all walnut KBP5 last night from Jimmy and drove straight to a gig and tried it out.(Walnut body, one piece Walnut neck) The sound was awesome! Very full, very round, sat perfectly in the mix, and everyone complimented on the tone afterwards. The band was a funk/reggae band with horn section and this bass definitely complimented the band much more than my Sadowksy(which is for sale). The singer has dubbed this bass Chocolate which pretty accurately describes how it sounded last night. Now all I have to do is wait for the LGC 4 which should be ready soon and i'll be all set!
I apologize for the terrible phone photos, Once I find my real camera I will take something decent.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
I'll post this up again... my "dream" LM... or maybe RA?
![]()
that looks like my LG5 if i go SB with it.. In fact that is what jimmy and i thought.. SB Nitro....i will repost the video again from last thread after i edit out some more eF words..
Can you get that much grain on alder. I love that look, but alder grain always seems more tame then ash.