TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nice tonewood ...sometimes called Limba too ( various species). I have a fretless with it - you know the bass George.
I've generally liked the wood so it will be interesting to hear how it sounds in a Coppolo package.
fwiw; all Reverends (guitar and bass) are Korina, and they're quite nice.
Reverend say korina is a very resonant and lively sounding wood and has a strong fundamental note attack with less compression, and good presence in the mids.
It's here! 2013 St Valentines Day Bassarce Who's going?
![]()
pls can i take opinions for kbp bass? i had a 62ri then i had to sell it,now i am lookin for a really good sounded vintage precision bass,i was thinking pino p,i am so confused![]()
pls can i take opinions for kbp bass? i had a 62ri then i had to sell it,now i am lookin for a really good sounded vintage precision bass,i was thinking pino p,i am so confused![]()
The Pino I played was simply magnificent, and had the very sleek neck versus the more chunky P neck of later years. I HATED that fake relic thing though. I would assume Jimmy could build you that sort of Pino hybrid thing (with the J neck or whatever Pino's bass has). Price would probably end up being about the same.
Does Jimmy have a booth at NAMM? He's not in the app yet, and I don't see anything on the web site.
I have the CS Pino sign P bass and it has a chunky neck profile, it's FAT and the most wonderful P bass I've ever played on. Never sell it !!The Pino I played was simply magnificent, and had the very sleek neck versus the more chunky P neck of later years. I HATED that fake relic thing though. I would assume Jimmy could build you that sort of Pino hybrid thing (with the J neck or whatever Pino's bass has). Price would probably end up being about the same.
Not this year Vic, and I honestly don't know if he'll do NAMM again... He doesn't need to, IMO. He's keeping focused on orders.
While I'll miss him there, I do think that's a very good call.Not this year Vic, and I honestly don't know if he'll do NAMM again... He doesn't need to, IMO. He's keeping focused on orders.
Coppolo not doing NAMM. Sadowsky not doing NAMM. Suhr not doing NAMM. It appears the smaller highly successful builders no longer find NAMM necessary to facilitate their business goals.Not this year Vic, and I honestly don't know if he'll do NAMM again... He doesn't need to, IMO. He's keeping focused on orders.
Coppolo not doing NAMM. Sadowsky not doing NAMM. Suhr not doing NAMM. It appears the smaller highly successful builders no longer find NAMM necessary to facilitate their business goals.
I am heading to NAMM this year, for a few reasons.
Its nice to speak face to face with builders/owners, I like having a "hand shake", and get to know the person, somehow it seems more personal, which is becoming a lost art.
I also like to see and hear the vibe about the economy, and listen to where they feel the industry is headed, which you cannot get from the internet. Its also nice to catch up with some musicians that you would never get to speak to in any other situation.
Its also a great time and place to reconnect with old friends and share a cocktail, catch up, visit in person.
And lastly, as allot of you know, in the lower section of the NAMM building you never know who is going to be the next Jimmy, Kerry, Lull, or Sadowsky, all of whom I have met downstairs as startups. There are allot of folks down there that have a passion for making instruments and amplification.
There is something to be said about holding, handling, smelling and hearing what the next batch of instruments are all about, which you can't get from the internet without the possibility of "returns" which cost someone money.
So its still quite enjoyable, and I can see everyones point.
This is my take - Cheers
MG
+1 Bergantino does not do NAMM either (nor does Glockenklang, Walter Woods,Mesa Boogie, etc., etc.). There are some small builders/companies that share a booth to control costs, but again, NAMM is primarily there for manufacturers to sell into dealers. That used to be a pretty big deal when there were a zillion mom and pops and no big box/internet retailers. Today, not so much.
In addition, many of these more boutique brands have a very small dealer network that they could easily visit personally at a fraction of the cost of a NAMM membership and/or booth, (or they sell mostly direct which would eliminate any need for NAMM participation).
That being said, for the big boys who sell internationally or depend greatly on the big box guys (GK, Fender, Paul Reed Smith, etc.), I guess it still makes some sense (at least Winter NAMM).