I'm sure everyone has seen enough of my RA5, so here's the LG5 fretless - LaBella tape wound strings, ebony fretboard, also a little on the different plan, also lovin' it...
Invalid Link Removed
How does the black standard 4 sound different...
... well, I'm still coming to grips with that...
Just to backtrack for a second, Jimmy Coppolo has a habit of putting extraordinary suitable basses in my hands. A short discussion with him usually results in most often ends up with having a wicked bass in my possession in short order. It happened with my RA5, which i'd never heard of until Jimmy said "You know, i got this one thing here you might like...", which is still the best bass I've ever played, bar none. It happened with my fretless too, a unique and very versatile instrument.
So, when I called Jimmy to tell him what I had in mind for a 4 string, he said, "Well, I got this one bass here"... He warned me that it sounded "big", and not necessarily strictly vintage, but that I would probably find it to be what I was looking for. He nailed it again.
So the bass, it sounds big. Even run passive it sounds big. It is very punchy and articulate, but oddly unaggressive - doesn't have the crispy/zingy Sadowsky thing happening (that's not a knock either to this bass or Sadowsky), nor does it really sound like a 70's jazz. It has a pretty wide range of sounds, and does not sound as "woody" as I would have expected - kind of modern woody I suppose. I haven't recorded it yet, but live it sounds killer. As I said, I don't claim to totally have a handle on it yet, but for the moment it feels and sounds like a slightly modernized bass with a vintage pedigree.
As for parts, it has an Indian rosewood board, stainless steel frets, and a poly finish. Also, I don't think the tuners are ultralights. The bass weighs nearly 10 lbs. (I'm not crazy about really light basses). It is an alder body. Hope that helps, Big String.
Invalid Link Removed
How does the black standard 4 sound different...
... well, I'm still coming to grips with that...Just to backtrack for a second, Jimmy Coppolo has a habit of putting extraordinary suitable basses in my hands. A short discussion with him usually results in most often ends up with having a wicked bass in my possession in short order. It happened with my RA5, which i'd never heard of until Jimmy said "You know, i got this one thing here you might like...", which is still the best bass I've ever played, bar none. It happened with my fretless too, a unique and very versatile instrument.
So, when I called Jimmy to tell him what I had in mind for a 4 string, he said, "Well, I got this one bass here"... He warned me that it sounded "big", and not necessarily strictly vintage, but that I would probably find it to be what I was looking for. He nailed it again.
So the bass, it sounds big. Even run passive it sounds big. It is very punchy and articulate, but oddly unaggressive - doesn't have the crispy/zingy Sadowsky thing happening (that's not a knock either to this bass or Sadowsky), nor does it really sound like a 70's jazz. It has a pretty wide range of sounds, and does not sound as "woody" as I would have expected - kind of modern woody I suppose. I haven't recorded it yet, but live it sounds killer. As I said, I don't claim to totally have a handle on it yet, but for the moment it feels and sounds like a slightly modernized bass with a vintage pedigree.
As for parts, it has an Indian rosewood board, stainless steel frets, and a poly finish. Also, I don't think the tuners are ultralights. The bass weighs nearly 10 lbs. (I'm not crazy about really light basses). It is an alder body. Hope that helps, Big String.