The purists will always say a PJ can never sound like a P. Then again, those same purists will also scream bloody murder about a preamp being on the bass (never mind that there is one in the amp head
).
fwiw I currently only own PJ fretted basses. I had a great passive P-bass awhile back, and have another one showing up soon, but truth be told for my gigs any subtleties will be easily lost and I certainly can't tell the difference in the mix. I can tell the difference in passive vs active, and will always take the extra flexibility that the onboard preamp gives me - as well as that bridge J pup to get some different tones.
I am very happy with my HPJ, and also happy with my Fodera PJ/Pope setups (EMG pups - make purists cringe every time I mention them). To me the only real issue is whether or not someone likes the PJ blended tone vs a JJ blended tone. I personally prefer the PJ by a wide margin, but I also don't like JJ basses (heretic!) so ymmv. I'm also rolled on the P pup probably 80% of the time depending on the particular gig.
fwiw I currently only own PJ fretted basses. I had a great passive P-bass awhile back, and have another one showing up soon, but truth be told for my gigs any subtleties will be easily lost and I certainly can't tell the difference in the mix. I can tell the difference in passive vs active, and will always take the extra flexibility that the onboard preamp gives me - as well as that bridge J pup to get some different tones.
I am very happy with my HPJ, and also happy with my Fodera PJ/Pope setups (EMG pups - make purists cringe every time I mention them). To me the only real issue is whether or not someone likes the PJ blended tone vs a JJ blended tone. I personally prefer the PJ by a wide margin, but I also don't like JJ basses (heretic!) so ymmv. I'm also rolled on the P pup probably 80% of the time depending on the particular gig.
