• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

You flipped that?
Man; I like that one...


FINISH | Vintage Blonde
BODY | Swamp Ash
FINGERBOARD | Maple, 12" Radius, 1 7/8" Nut Width
PICKGUARD | Parchment
HARDWARE | Chrome
PICKUPS | Sadowsky P/J
WEIGHT | 8.60 lbs. (3.90 kg)
PREAMP | Sadowsky Preamp with Vintage Tone Control
STRINGS | SBS45B • Blue (Stainless Steel 45-130T)

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

5302 was the clear tonal winner for me despite both being incredible instruments. That's what locked me in for the ash/maple config.
 
Mine is awesome and thank you to Luke for letting it go! It's really sonically EPIC! The looks and feel of the P-body are perfect too...
5633_LRG.jpg
 
I keed, I keed...then again I'm a heretic because I hate JJ basses so my views are likely suspect.
Yep. We can fix that, too. You realize I work for a company that makes missiles, right? :)

You flipped that?
Man; I like that one...
Actually, returned eval... I tried really hard to like the blonde finish 'cause it was such an amazing instrument, but no soap.
 
Chef said:
I've never played a Sadowsky P-bodied P, or, PJ.

I had two previous J bodied Sad PJ's, one RV, one MV, and that aesthetic suits me more.
Neither of those basses suited me though.

I dunno if the P-body vs J body makes a big diff, it'd be intereting to compare...

My current Sadowsky PJ5 is an ash/maple MV5 with a J body, again, and this one does seem to be a keeper...

I don't think the body shape makes much of a difference, and I generally prefer the J shape. But I feel that, on an aesthetic level, putting a P pickup in a J body is like putting whitewalls on a Prius.
 
Mine is awesome and thank you to Luke for letting it go! It's really sonically EPIC! The looks and feel of the P- body are perfect too..

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Ok, that's one I could love, and in a kind of indirect way, sorta do... except ash/maple... :)
 
P. Bass said:
So you like it - but you don't like it ?
B.

Lemme put it this way: if I needed a PJ right now, I'd take that one with no regrets. If I were ordering one? I've wanted a natural ash/black/maple bass for a *long* time...

Interesting aside: I find that what I like depends on the body shape, as well. No secret that I don't like bursts or pickguards; but I prefer a P bass *with* a guard than without. And there's a Lakland with a Mai-tai burst that tossed my burst-aversion under a bus.
 
P. Bass said:
I just thought that with your ash/maple J & the 24 w/ebony, you might enjoy a 3rd spec. I really think there's a valid sonic sweetness in rw that works well w/ PJs. You can still get some bite out of it as well but of a SLIGHTLY less aggressive nature IMO.
B.

It's entirely possible but, as Vic said, I'm thinking that I'd prefer the more aggressive ash/maple. Ideally, I'd prefer to go NYC with a universal route and go both JJ and PJ all in one.
 
No secret that I don't like bursts.....; but I prefer a P bass *with* a guard than without.....
A P-Bass HAS to have a pg!!!
Bursts are another story for me. Love 2 tone burst! Up until '62 Leo's basses had a burst that looked really fine. Starting in '63 they went w/a 3 colour burst, for some time, that was just over the top for me.(way to much yellow & bright red). Roger's '59 burst NAILED it for me & would have gone w/o if that was not the case. I saw a custom burst on a flat top guitar once that had me losing sleep. It was a medium chocolate brown into amber that was Exquisite!
B.
 
A P-Bass HAS to have a pg!!!
Bursts are another story for me. Love 2 tone burst! Up until '62 Leo's basses had a burst that looked really fine. Starting in '63 they went w/a 3 colour burst, for some time, that was just over the top for me.(way to much yellow & bright red). Roger's '59 burst NAILED it for me & would have gone w/o if that was not the case. I saw a custom burst on a flat top guitar once that had me losing sleep. It was a medium chocolate brown into amber that was Exquisite!
B.
My P5 is also a two-tone burst, and has the gold anodized guard, but it's ash/maple with a one-piece maple neck and skunk stripe (tho vintage tint on the neck), and it does have the P shaped body. Even more traditionally, it's all passive.

My Sadowsky PJ5 is the "newer spec", 3-tone burst, two piece neck (tho still maple, just not tinted), and of course the tort guard. But it's also a J body. :)
 
Sorry, I find the offset body to be less pleasing from a visual (and physical) standpoint. Ymmv and obviously does (ie all your taste is in your mouth) :D

I keed, I keed...then again I'm a heretic because I hate JJ basses so my views are likely suspect.

I love JJ basses and agree with you. For me P-J's work better with a P bass body. So Vic is wrong again. :D

:hiding:
 
A P-Bass HAS to have a pg!!!

Yeah, I think you're right. I've never seen a guardless P that I've liked. I think the single pup sort of looks like it's floating without the pickguard to anchor it.

Bursts are another story for me. Love 2 tone burst! Up until '62 Leo's basses had a burst that looked really fine. Starting in '63 they went w/a 3 colour burst, for some time, that was just over the top for me.(way to much yellow & bright red). Roger's '59 burst NAILED it for me & would have gone w/o if that was not the case. I saw a custom burst on a flat top guitar once that had me losing sleep. It was a medium chocolate brown into amber that was Exquisite!
B.

Medium choco into amber would do it for me as well.

I love this violin-burst:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

And this caramel burst:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

And here's the Mai-tai burst:
Invalid Link Removed