TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
here's some more of the top....
![]()
here's some more of the top....
![]()
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I'm a sucker for a trans blue body, especially with a killer quilted top, and a maple board... especially birdseye. Dude that bass is amazing!here's some more of the top....
They have different types of pickups, don't they? If so, that might be it right there.Hey, I have a question for all of you NYC two-timers (those who have both a 4 and a 5 in identical wood combinations). I have recently acquired an ash/maple Standard 5 and I'm surprised to find that it sounds quite different from my ash/maple Standard 4.
They have different types of pickups, don't they? If so, that might be it right there.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I'm a sucker for a trans blue body, especially with a killer quilted top, and a maple board... especially birdseye. Dude that bass is amazing!
I would figure the additional mass due to the wider neck and slightly larger body is what your hearing plus the pure fact that every tree is different and will resonate at different points even in the same species...Hey, I have a question for all of you NYC two-timers (those who have both a 4 and a 5 in identical wood combinations). I have recently acquired an ash/maple Standard 5 and I'm surprised to find that it sounds quite different from my ash/maple Standard 4. I'm not quite sure how to explain the difference. The lows on the 5 are more throaty and the highs seem to sing out a bit more. The open E is also slightly more aggressive than on the 4. I'm tempted to say that the five sounds more "alive" than the 4 (which sounds slightly more mellow) - it's kind of like the difference between Chaka Khan and Sade. At this point, I'm not favouring one bass over the other, I'm just curious as to why there might be such a difference. Is it simply a matter of 5 vs 4, or perhaps the presence of the string tree on the headstock of the 5? I've never before owned a 4 and 5 of the "same bass" so any insight on your parts would be helpful. Thanks, guys.
I decided to go for the Porta bag, I have no use for the suitcase style
as i don't tour much, this is great for city Bar/cafe gigs,
![]()
A P pickup is a split coil (ie humbucking) arrangement so you can't use if with a single-coil pickup in the bridge without getting hum even when the two pickups are blended in the middle. Most commonly a hum cancelling J pickup is used in the bridge so that both the P and J pickup are both hum cancelling and you don't get the hum problem. You can, in theory use a single coil J pickup in the bridge, but potentially you will always have hum (ie you can't blend it out other than by soloing the p pickup).
But that's just it... there's no such thing as "Sadowsky" pickups. They're all made by other vendors, and they use different vendors for different pickups. I can't remember the matrix right now, but it bears checking out and verifying. I seem to recall there were some diffs between the 4 string models and the 5 string models.No, same pickups (Sad hum cancelling on both).
But that's just it... there's no such thing as "Sadowsky" pickups. They're all made by other vendors, and they use different vendors for different pickups. I can't remember the matrix right now, but it bears checking out and verifying. I seem to recall there were some diffs between the 4 string models and the 5 string models.