I played a roasted maple five today since I attended my kid’s competition
in that area today. I think it sounds great, but the front to back profile of the neck was quite chunky.
yes. It’s quite thick, compare to a metroline.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I played a roasted maple five today since I attended my kid’s competition
in that area today. I think it sounds great, but the front to back profile of the neck was quite chunky.
Are tuners on Metroexpress light tuners? Mine the headstock is very heavy and the balance is VERY bad...
Green or red = hot. The other one and grey = ground.Hi. I can’t find a diagram for the wires for the Japanese split coil jazz pickups. There’s three wires. Red, green and black. Thanks for your help.
To me, the tuners are one of the weakest links of Sadowsky Metroexpress and German Metroline basses. Heavy and not smooth turning. They just feel cheap.
I think the tuners used on the MetroExpress are the same all the way up the model lineup to the Custom Shop basses, which is unfortunate. For the MetroExpress line, no complaints with 'em, but for the Metroline and up price point, they should be better than they are. Never had any complaints with the licensed Hipshots on other basses I've had, and I've dang sure never had a complaint with Hipshot USA. With that, I put Hipshot USA Ultralites on my Metro MJ5 and am very happy with that bass overall as everything else is what I'd expect in an instrument with Sadowsky on the headstock.
I've wanted to snag a MetroExpress though - especially with the rumors that a bunch of the early revised ones actually had 1.75" nuts on them instead of 1.875". But, there's the talk of the necks being different in a chunky way. To quote Hall & Oats - "I can't go for that," so I've resisted the urge.
I’d have to agree that my MIC MetroExpress has tuners that work but don’t feel particularly great. For the price I paid I’m not mad and understand these won’t be as nice as my NYC’s but this would definitely be something I’d love to upgrade if I keep the bass long-term.
I’m not sure if this has been discussed in this thread or maybe somewhere else on TalkBass, but I’ve been debating a “total vintage makeover” on my MetroExpress to make it a bit more my style and speed…something like a solid color, matching headstock, drop-in Sadowsky preamp with VTC, universal route for JJ/PJ swapping capabilities, relic work, maybe even different frets.
The MetroExpress line seems like it would be the perfect platform these kind of mods to a make a solid working bass a cool and unique instrument…anyone else out there been considering this?
Just want to say, got the Drop in pre amp for My Metro-Express P-J and it made a huge difference. The passive treble cut takes a bit of clankeness out of both pick ups. Ironically the active treble boost doesn't seem to have that clankiness. I used it today in church and it nailed P tone great. I am going to upgrade to hip-shots. But this is a GREAT bass, especially as a back up. It is a bit heavy at just under ten pounds. View attachment 5348900
I think the tuners used on the MetroExpress are the same all the way up the model lineup to the Custom Shop basses, which is unfortunate. For the MetroExpress line, no complaints with 'em, but for the Metroline and up price point, they should be better than they are. Never had any complaints with the licensed Hipshots on other basses I've had, and I've dang sure never had a complaint with Hipshot USA. With that, I put Hipshot USA Ultralites on my Metro MJ5 and am very happy with that bass overall as everything else is what I'd expect in an instrument with Sadowsky on the headstock.
I've wanted to snag a MetroExpress though - especially with the rumors that a bunch of the early revised ones actually had 1.75" nuts on them instead of 1.875". But, there's the talk of the necks being different in a chunky way. To quote Hall & Oats - "I can't go for that," so I've resisted the urge.
The only real thing that I don't love is the 1.875" nut as well, like you I greatly prefer a 1.75". Someone was selling a MetroExpress prototype on the TB Classifieds with the 1.75" nut but the price was a bit more than I can pay at the moment for it. It would be super cool to see the MetroExpress line expand with the thinner 1.75" nut width available on all models as well as other things like a P body and a P-only configuration.
I can bring my MetroExpress back with me the next time I'm in Texas and you can check it out for yourself if you'd like! The neck profile is somewhat thinner than I expected for a 1.875" nut and does help a bit for those acclimated to thinner necks.
Speaking of a platform to mod, check this out. https://reverb.com/item/79033759-sadowsky-metro-express-metallic-ice-blue
(Not affiliated)
Does anyone know what the bridge string spacing and pickup placement is on the 5 string Metroline MJ? The Stingray one?