• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

SadowskybodyDSC_4392.gif

just ordered one today Ash/maple with SC's, birdseye fret board.
here's a pic of the body blank. now the the long wait
OH MY!:eek:
 
I am itching for a 3rd Sadowsky. My first was an M5-24 but at the time I thought it was a little too modern for some of my needs so I traded it for the RV-4 that is my avatar. I love the RV-4. I loved the M5-24 as well an dam thinking now that I have the more "traditional" tone covered, maybe an M5-24 would be nice to have back. I tend to want to use a 5 string for church and "smooth/contemporary" jazz gigs. I'm thinking the M5-24 would be great for that. I'd use the RV-4 for more "traditional" jazz gigs, my cover band and the "horn" band.

I know a Sadowsky Club thread is not a place for unbiased opinions, but what do you think? Is my logic on track? Or since I like the HC jazz pups in my RV4, should I look at an RV-5 instead? Or maybe an R5-24? The Rosewood board would maybe be a little less "modern" sounding but still more "modern" than another jazz pickup bass.
 
Basses.jpg

SadowskyNat.jpg

Question for you guys, I really want a 3-tone sunburst. Should I get this one painted or just hold out for one to come on the market or what? What would you do?

(I would sell the natural to Jerry Ziarko, and then wait for a 3 tone to show up. :D)
Wow the power of suggestion actually worked. I've gassed for that one for quite some time. Well. the time has come.:hyper:
 
I am itching for a 3rd Sadowsky. My first was an M5-24 but at the time I thought it was a little too modern for some of my needs so I traded it for the RV-4 that is my avatar. I love the RV-4. I loved the M5-24 as well an dam thinking now that I have the more "traditional" tone covered, maybe an M5-24 would be nice to have back. I tend to want to use a 5 string for church and "smooth/contemporary" jazz gigs. I'm thinking the M5-24 would be great for that. I'd use the RV-4 for more "traditional" jazz gigs, my cover band and the "horn" band.

I know a Sadowsky Club thread is not a place for unbiased opinions, but what do you think? Is my logic on track? Or since I like the HC jazz pups in my RV4, should I look at an RV-5 instead? Or maybe an R5-24? The Rosewood board would maybe be a little less "modern" sounding but still more "modern" than another jazz pickup bass.

Here's my completely non bias opinion. You should get a RV-5 and sell me your RV-4. Simple! And everybody is happy. But mostly you. I'm just there to help.
 
Here's my completely non bias opinion. You should get a RV-5 and sell me your RV-4. Simple! And everybody is happy. But mostly you. I'm just there to help.

Except that I want to keep my RV-4. I have regretted selling only a couple basses over the years - this would be another so I think I'll keep it for a while. I am torn over if I should go R5-24 or M5-24
 
Well, tonight is my first night were I get to gig my UV70 with the Thunderfunk. I am really stoked to get this thing out and let it fly. My band does an eclectic variety of Lady Gaga, Justin Timberlake, Maroon 5, Beyonce, old school funk, some hip hop and some great 90's hip hop/R&B. It will be exciting to hear how it responds to my pedals and the overall band sound. I might have some clips to post..... hopefully.

We have a few youtube videos so far, but nothing too great.

I also swapped out the tort pickguard for a black one. I love the 70's vibe of my UV.
 
Well, I did some A/B'ing today. The Avalon doesn't help the Yamaha/Bart bass. It doesn't really add anything to the Sadowsky, either, that I can't get with some EQ'ing on my Max 12 head.

So....I won't be buying the Avalon. I think I want another Sadowsky, probably an M5-24 for a more modern sound and something fairly different from the "60's jazz placement" RV-4 but still under the umbrella of awesome Sadowsky tone.

The Yamaha is for sale, and then I just have to come up with another $1,200 or so.
 
So now the quandry - Metro MV5 or spend another $1500 for a NYC. So is the 1.3 lbs lighter worth the money is the question...
You can find Metros that are, while not as stupid light as some NYC's, in a VERY pleasant weight range, so I personally wouldn't sweat the weight if that's your only quandary. I used to be a bit more of an NYC snob even given the same specs on a bass, but I have to be honest, my latest Metro has made me a believer. If they're all like that*, you don't need the options or extra weight savings, try the Metro first.

* I have to keep qualifying this, because I've played a bunch of Metros in the past, and while they really are great basses, I always felt, at least IME, there was enough of a difference with the NYC's that I'd personally typically choose to spend the extra money. This latest PJ5, however, has changed my position on that. At this point, if there was a config I was looking for that was available in the Metro, I'd probably opt for that one at least as a first eval.
 
Hey guys, a buddy of mine had his circa 2000 NYC Modern 5 stolen.
It's quilt top/ash body, maple neck birdseye fingerboard, cherryburst.
I believe those are the exact specs....I'l find out exactly in a day or two.

I know he was moving to S.Carolina, but I'm unsure if it was down there or here in the Detroit area.

I just heard from a friend of mine and haven't talked to him yet.
I'll get the exact deets and ser# as soon as I can.
 
Hey guys, a buddy of mine had his circa 2000 NYC Modern 5 stolen.
It's quilt top/ash body, maple neck birdseye fingerboard, cherryburst.
I believe those are the exact specs....I'l find out exactly in a day or two.

I know he was moving to S.Carolina, but I'm unsure if it was down there or here in the Detroit area.

I just heard from a friend of mine and haven't talked to him yet.
I'll get the exact deets and ser# as soon as I can.


That sucks to hear. I am very sorry for your friend. I am sure we will all keep our eyes peeled for this bass.
 
Or Quasimoto, for fellow fans of the Sopranos. :D

Regarding the Metro vs NYC thing...as much as I tell myself to shut up and not add fuel to the fire...here goes. :ninja:

Try 'em. I've played Metros that sound better than NYC's and vice versa. When you find the one that's right for you, you'll know. Good luck...

I'm with this guy even though he has a really great name.:D

It's really depending on the bass. The Metros have really hit the mark in so many ways. It boils down to if you want something outside of the Metro grocery list...weight, color, fancy-schmansie coffee table top.
 
Or Quasimoto, for fellow fans of the Sopranos. :D
:D

Regarding the Metro vs NYC thing...as much as I tell myself to shut up and not add fuel to the fire...here goes. :ninja:

Try 'em. I've played Metros that sound better than NYC's and vice versa. When you find the one that's right for you, you'll know. Good luck...
Trying to keep my comments on an even keel as well, but this makes sense, and is in accordance with Roger's comments as well. Just that, either I've had really great luck with NYC's or not so good luck with Metros, because at least for me, the NYC's consistently felt and sounded noticeably better. This last PJ upset my personal stats and threw the grading curve off though. :)
 
You can find Metros that are, while not as stupid light as some NYC's, in a VERY pleasant weight range, so I personally wouldn't sweat the weight if that's your only quandary. I used to be a bit more of an NYC snob even given the same specs on a bass, but I have to be honest, my latest Metro has made me a believer. If they're all like that*, you don't need the options or extra weight savings, try the Metro first.

* I have to keep qualifying this, because I've played a bunch of Metros in the past, and while they really are great basses, I always felt, at least IME, there was enough of a difference with the NYC's that I'd personally typically choose to spend the extra money. This latest PJ5, however, has changed my position on that. At this point, if there was a config I was looking for that was available in the Metro, I'd probably opt for that one at least as a first eval.

Basically looking at 9 lbs vs 7.7 for a 5-string JJ. The NYC has a nice quilt but that isn't a must-have for me. I do prefer the black hardware and no-pickguard of the NYC but like a 59 burst. I *love* my RV5PJ - total keeper. Looking now for a JJ ash/maple companion. My PJ is a little over 9lbs and isn't "heavy" but it weighs more than my Zon. Not the end of the world but I did feel it last gig (which admittedly was 4+ hours of playing time).
 
Well, I did some A/B'ing today. The Avalon doesn't help the Yamaha/Bart bass. It doesn't really add anything to the Sadowsky, either, that I can't get with some EQ'ing on my Max 12 head.

So....I won't be buying the Avalon. I think I want another Sadowsky, probably an M5-24 for a more modern sound and something fairly different from the "60's jazz placement" RV-4 but still under the umbrella of awesome Sadowsky tone.

The Yamaha is for sale, and then I just have to come up with another $1,200 or so.

That is the magic of the Avalon.

I feel that you are making the right decision. I would not sell that RV-4. It seems like you are thrilled with the playability and tone, it has a very unique color that is quite rare besides being plain out cool. It just seems like a winner on all accounts.

I'm not sure I'd not consider at least an MJ or a PJ to add to the arsenal. You've owned an M5-24, right?