OH MY!![]()
just ordered one today Ash/maple with SC's, birdseye fret board.
here's a pic of the body blank. now the the long wait
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
OH MY!![]()
just ordered one today Ash/maple with SC's, birdseye fret board.
here's a pic of the body blank. now the the long wait
Part of the reason the will lee has 22 frets is because Will always plays with a bell pickup cover. If he wasnt using a cover, he would have opted for 24 frets.
![]()
![]()
Question for you guys, I really want a 3-tone sunburst. Should I get this one painted or just hold out for one to come on the market or what? What would you do?

I am itching for a 3rd Sadowsky. My first was an M5-24 but at the time I thought it was a little too modern for some of my needs so I traded it for the RV-4 that is my avatar. I love the RV-4. I loved the M5-24 as well an dam thinking now that I have the more "traditional" tone covered, maybe an M5-24 would be nice to have back. I tend to want to use a 5 string for church and "smooth/contemporary" jazz gigs. I'm thinking the M5-24 would be great for that. I'd use the RV-4 for more "traditional" jazz gigs, my cover band and the "horn" band.
I know a Sadowsky Club thread is not a place for unbiased opinions, but what do you think? Is my logic on track? Or since I like the HC jazz pups in my RV4, should I look at an RV-5 instead? Or maybe an R5-24? The Rosewood board would maybe be a little less "modern" sounding but still more "modern" than another jazz pickup bass.
Here's my completely non bias opinion. You should get a RV-5 and sell me your RV-4. Simple! And everybody is happy. But mostly you. I'm just there to help.
Except that I want to keep my RV-4. I have regretted selling only a couple basses over the years - this would be another so I think I'll keep it for a while. I am torn over if I should go R5-24 or M5-24
Just call me Nostradamus, 'cause I predicted this....I think I want another Sadowsky...
The Yamaha is for sale...
Just call me Nostradamus, 'cause I predicted this.![]()

You can find Metros that are, while not as stupid light as some NYC's, in a VERY pleasant weight range, so I personally wouldn't sweat the weight if that's your only quandary. I used to be a bit more of an NYC snob even given the same specs on a bass, but I have to be honest, my latest Metro has made me a believer. If they're all like that*, you don't need the options or extra weight savings, try the Metro first.So now the quandry - Metro MV5 or spend another $1500 for a NYC. So is the 1.3 lbs lighter worth the money is the question...
Hey guys, a buddy of mine had his circa 2000 NYC Modern 5 stolen.
It's quilt top/ash body, maple neck birdseye fingerboard, cherryburst.
I believe those are the exact specs....I'l find out exactly in a day or two.
I know he was moving to S.Carolina, but I'm unsure if it was down there or here in the Detroit area.
I just heard from a friend of mine and haven't talked to him yet.
I'll get the exact deets and ser# as soon as I can.
Or Quasimoto, for fellow fans of the Sopranos.
Regarding the Metro vs NYC thing...as much as I tell myself to shut up and not add fuel to the fire...here goes.
Try 'em. I've played Metros that sound better than NYC's and vice versa. When you find the one that's right for you, you'll know. Good luck...
Or Quasimoto, for fellow fans of the Sopranos.![]()
Trying to keep my comments on an even keel as well, but this makes sense, and is in accordance with Roger's comments as well. Just that, either I've had really great luck with NYC's or not so good luck with Metros, because at least for me, the NYC's consistently felt and sounded noticeably better. This last PJ upset my personal stats and threw the grading curve off though.Regarding the Metro vs NYC thing...as much as I tell myself to shut up and not add fuel to the fire...here goes.
Try 'em. I've played Metros that sound better than NYC's and vice versa. When you find the one that's right for you, you'll know. Good luck...
You can find Metros that are, while not as stupid light as some NYC's, in a VERY pleasant weight range, so I personally wouldn't sweat the weight if that's your only quandary. I used to be a bit more of an NYC snob even given the same specs on a bass, but I have to be honest, my latest Metro has made me a believer. If they're all like that*, you don't need the options or extra weight savings, try the Metro first.
* I have to keep qualifying this, because I've played a bunch of Metros in the past, and while they really are great basses, I always felt, at least IME, there was enough of a difference with the NYC's that I'd personally typically choose to spend the extra money. This latest PJ5, however, has changed my position on that. At this point, if there was a config I was looking for that was available in the Metro, I'd probably opt for that one at least as a first eval.
Well, I did some A/B'ing today. The Avalon doesn't help the Yamaha/Bart bass. It doesn't really add anything to the Sadowsky, either, that I can't get with some EQ'ing on my Max 12 head.
So....I won't be buying the Avalon. I think I want another Sadowsky, probably an M5-24 for a more modern sound and something fairly different from the "60's jazz placement" RV-4 but still under the umbrella of awesome Sadowsky tone.
The Yamaha is for sale, and then I just have to come up with another $1,200 or so.