But I also love gold
View attachment 3545760
I really have to stop playing with their “configurator”. This is a dangerous game![]()
Enticing right. I do wish the relic'ing didnt add $1k euro tho :/
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
But I also love gold
View attachment 3545760
I really have to stop playing with their “configurator”. This is a dangerous game![]()
True, it’s expensive. But it’s some of the best relic’ing I’ve ever seen. I prefer it to Fender’s custom shop most of the time.Enticing right. I do wish the relic'ing didnt add $1k euro tho :/
It’s purely a skill and man hours thing, if it takes a skilled professional an extra weeks work and more materials etc. It’s going to cost more!Enticing right. I do wish the relic'ing didnt add $1k euro tho :/
So... this happened yesterday:
Link Removed
happens! 


I like the anesthetics of the Caedar as well, so that would not be a problem even if I decided to go with the older version. I read on Fb and in a YouTube video that the SL lacks a bit of the low end - nothing crazy and it can be easily adjusted with the eq on the amp. Is it the same with the paulownia? I mean, would it be worth to wait and spend 100 € more for the low end, or can I just go with the Caedar and mess around with the eq on the amp? I really hope my question makes senseOne of the differences with the Cedar was the finish they were able to put on the bass, the wood limited what they could do, hence Paulownia move.
I have played the prototype SL bass and it really is a joy and punchy, I would think it largely depends on your colour preference and grain like aesthetically
I like the anesthetics of the Caedar as well, so that would not be a problem even if I decided to go with the older version. I read on Fb and in a YouTube video that the SL lacks a bit of the low end - nothing crazy and it can be easily adjusted with the eq on the amp. Is it the same with the paulownia? I mean, would it be worth to wait and spend 100 € more for the low end, or can I just go with the Caedar and mess around with the eq on the amp? I really hope my question makes sense![]()
That’s interesting. Have you noticed any significant changes to the tone and frequency range compared to the other basses?I have a super light......and let me tell u it’s a game changer. I cant believe more people aren’t talking about them. I have the cedar body and it’s resonant, punchy, and all the other superlatives we like in an instrument. The black label pickups are very flexible. It’s crazy playing a 6.5 lb 5 string......changes the way you play because there is no fighting the weight of the bass. I would say get one regardless of wood.
That’s interesting. Have you noticed any significant changes to the tone and frequency range compared to the other basses?
Yes, the way you will go about finding and shaping tones is totally different-just like any other bass. However........all the “usual” tones are in there. It is very flexible.......very. Many argue a five string J type bass is the ultimate one bass gig solution. This bass actually takes it a step further. The fact that these things are $1500 is a steal. I have bought other brands for that and there were sacrifices in tone and or build up quality. I have yet to discover either in this sandberg. If you do your research on sandberg-you will discover they are back ordered on many models, there are many individuals associated with the bass community who can endorse, sell, or play anything.....and they are choosing to be associated with sandberg because of tone and build quality. Every manufacturer over the years has made quality stuff and less than quality stuff-the key is to pickup a product in its sweet spot, before demand supersedes production or cooperate takeover dilutes the brand. So.............I think now is the time
I hear you. Same GAS as mine. My only regret is that I didn’t buy that black Nighthawk from NAMM. It was incredible how it played and sounded.My bad..:........no I haven’t. I’m afraid to play another sandberg......because I will end up with a custom master build tm5............which may or may not have been built more than a few times on the configurator
Yep... I'm about to pull the trigger on my 3rd custom build. That darned configurator will bankrupt me if I'm not careful!My bad..:........no I haven’t. I’m afraid to play another sandberg......because I will end up with a custom master build tm5............which may or may not have been built more than a few times on the configurator
Yeah I am familiar with Sandberg basses, and I love them for their build quality and playability. I was wondering if you had a chance to compare your SL bass with the other Sandberg basses, not the basses in general, sorry for not specifying it first. My only concern is that how SL will behave in a live setting, in a dense mix. My favorite one so far is VM-5, I played their VM5 Nighthawk at Sandberg booth at NAMM and loved it very much! The playing comfort is just perfect!
Sorry, Ive put it here by. mistake. Can't delete it for some reasonView attachment 3552071 That was the bass I’m taking about. I even tried to buy it back after a while, so good it was...
Yep... I'm about to pull the trigger on my 3rd custom build. That darned configurator will bankrupt me if I'm not careful!